Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$22.76
▼ $0.44 (-1.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:12 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$19.06B
Day Range
$22.75 - $23.25
52-Week Range
$11.92 - $24.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$18.95
Resistance
$24.65
+67.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 0.78
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
43
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
59
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Permian Resources Corporation has centered on its strong stock performance and analyst optimism. The company’s shares surged **17.1%** since its last earnings report, sparking speculation about future gains. Seaport Global initiated coverage with a **Buy rating and a $29 price target**, highlighting its potential. Analysts also debated its valuation—praised for its profitability and fundamentals but flagged for risks like growth sustainability and industry volatility. Long-term investor returns were noted as impressive, with a **35.18% annualized return** over five years.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Permian Resources Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
34
Fundamentals
59
Technical
43
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+23%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+17
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for PR suggests a dominant anchoring bias, as the stock lingers near resistance (1.9% below) while euphoria persists due to strong sentiment (100/100) and a 16.1% premium over its 200-day average. The narrative-reality gap (21 points) implies investors may be overestimating fundamentals relative to price action. The key question is whether traders will break free from the resistance anchor or adjust expectations as momentum remains weak (-0.9% ROC).
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:53 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Seaport Global Initiates Coverage of Permian Resources (PR) at Buy"
"Permian Resources Corporation (NYSE:PR) has turned into one of the most important shale operators... hit its record high of just over $24 per share"
"$100 invested in Permian Resources 5 years ago would be worth more than the market average, producing an average annual return of 35.18%"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 86/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Edgar Lawrence Smith's documented principles, the model estimates a strong "buy and hold for a decade" case, reflected in his high score of 69, whereas Benjamin Graham’s Enterprising Investor framework estimates the stock is far from statistically cheap, yielding a low score of 12. Morgan Housel and the efficient‑market viewpoint assign moderate scores (63 and 53), indicating the stock is holdable but not an effortless or clearly superior choice to an index. Growth‑oriented thinkers such as Philip Fisher, Peter Lynch, and Howard Marks give lower scores (49, 33, 42) because the company lacks the quality/growth signature and may already have high expectations in a late‑cycle setting. Overall, the spread of scores—from value‑focused optimism to caution about growth, valuation, and cyclical risk—explains why the historical methodologies converge on a generally cautious outlook despite some optimism from long‑term value advocates.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 55
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 54
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 42
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 41
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 40
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 16
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
28.9%
Net Margin
18.5%
EBITDA Margin
28.9%
ROE
9.1%
ROA
5.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.31
Cash
$153.69M
Total Debt
$3.55B
Current Ratio
0.78
Debt/Equity
0.34
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 16.6.2026 | $0.160 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.160 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.160 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.160 |
| 17.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.150 |
| 16.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.150 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.150 |
| 15.6.2025 | $0.150 |
| 17.3.2025 | $0.150 |
| 16.3.2025 | $0.150 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$14.06
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$14.06
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
StockStory · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Fintel · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
Permian Resources Corporation (PR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PR currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
PR's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.34; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 0.78; Calmar: 0.45 (3y annualized return 19.2% / max drawdown 42.7%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -11.7%.
Yes — PR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 5 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell John Charles | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 5,492 | -5,492 | $23.75 |
| Shannon Robert Regan | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 5,104 | -5,104 | $23.75 |
| Oliphint Guy M | Open Market Sale | 3.9.2026 | 5,103 | -5,103 | $23.75 |
| Bell John Charles | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 24,306 | +24,306 | — |
| Shannon Robert Regan | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 24,306 | +24,306 | — |
| Oliphint Guy M | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 24,306 | +24,306 | — |
| GRAY STEVEN D | Gift | 26.8.2026 | 228,880 | -24,000 | — |
| GRAY STEVEN D | Gift | 26.8.2026 | 24,000 | -24,000 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 161,666 | -3,100 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 157,566 | -4,100 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 4,100 | -4,100 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 24.8.2026 | 3,100 | -3,100 | — |
| Cochran Frost W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 14,045 | +14,045 | — |
| Quinn William J | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 14,045 | +14,045 | — |
| Quinn William J | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 1,032,790 | +14,045 | — |
| Cochran Frost W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 14,045 | +14,045 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 5,500 | -5,500 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Gift | 18.6.2026 | 164,766 | -5,500 | — |
| Oliphint Guy M | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 62,769 | -62,769 | $20.44 |
| Oliphint Guy M | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 542,503 | -62,769 | $20.44 |
| Marquez Aron | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 14,045 | +14,045 | — |
| Eves Karan E | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 14,045 | +14,045 | — |
| Tichio Robert M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 14,778 | +14,778 | — |
| GRAY STEVEN D | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 22,350 | +22,350 | — |
| Baldwin Maire A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 15,022 | +15,022 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
19,759,479 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 22,096,519 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology