Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$1.89
▼ $0.01 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/30 11:49 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/30/2026
News analyzed: 09/30/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$1.89 - $1.90
52-Week Range
$1.24 - $2.15
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$1.67
Resistance
$1.96
PERF is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-1.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $2.54 vs. price $1.89 (+34.6%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -2.5% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
53
Quality
63
Value
57
Momentum
39
Risk
62
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
53
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Perfect Corp. highlights its expansion in AI and augmented reality (AR) technology within the beauty and fashion sectors. Key themes include strategic partnerships—such as its collaboration with QWEEN for hyper-realistic 3D virtual jewelry try-ons and integration with Vereme’s AI stylist using its YouCam APIs. The company also announced an upcoming extraordinary shareholders’ meeting and the return of its annual Global Beauty & Fashion Tech Forum in New York, emphasizing innovation and industry collaboration.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Perfect Corp. Class A Ordinary Share. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
8
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
31
Fundamentals
53
Technical
39
Valuation
57
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
34
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s near-universal fixation on the 0.3% resistance gap (anchoring) dominates, overshadowing even mild FOMO or euphoria. Traders appear to be waiting for confirmation of a breakout, despite the stock’s modest momentum and valuation discount. The narrative-reality gap is negligible, implying no misalignment between price action and fundamentals. The key question: will the resistance hold, or will traders abandon the anchor if momentum stalls?
Updated: 09/05/2026, 05:44 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Powered by Perfect Corp.’s Web Consultation Mode for Jewellery... integrated Perfect Corp.'s YouCam AI API suite"
"Perfect Corp. (NYSE: PERF), the global leader in AI and AR technology... leading AI and AR beauty and fashion technology company"
"called an extraordinary general meeting... 8th Annual Global Beauty & Fashion Tech Forum"
"Perfect (PERF) Price Target Increased by 16.18% to 3.57"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 17/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between methodologies, with some models seeing it as a rock-solid opportunity and others dismissing it outright. The highest scorers—Walter Bagehot (100) and Gerald M. Loeb (83)—highlight its liquidity and capital-preservation strengths, framing it as a defensive hold during volatility. Meanwhile, patient long-term investors like Howard Marks (76) and Morgan Housel (76) praise its quiet compounding potential, suggesting it aligns with disciplined, time-horizon-driven strategies. However, the lower-scoring crowd—particularly Samuel Armstrong Nelson (5) and Thorstein Veblen (30)—warns of overvaluation or speculative tendencies, with Nelson flagging it as overbought and Veblen detecting growth-chasing behavior. Even Graham’s dual approaches split: his traditional method (66) sees marginal potential, while his enterprising bar (49) finds it lacking deep value, illustrating how nuanced interpretations of 'value' can clash.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 83
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 77
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 66
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 66
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 49
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 46
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 41
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 37
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 289 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 7 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A pattern consistent with an early/mid distribution phase — a trading range after an advance with declining volume.
Medium confidence
$1.67
Range Bottom
$1.96
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
77.4%
Operating Margin
-2.5%
Net Margin
6.7%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
3.0%
ROA
2.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.05
Cash
$125.98M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
4.60
Debt/Equity
0.01
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.89
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$2.54
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+34.6%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
13.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 13.5% | $14.62M | $13.41M |
| 2 | 10.8% | $16.19M | $13.63M |
| 3 | 8.0% | $17.49M | $13.50M |
| 4 | 5.3% | $18.40M | $13.04M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $18.86M | $12.26M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$12.88M
Terminal Value
$297.48M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$193.34M
Enterprise Value
$259.18M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$259.18M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$1.50
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.49
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Business Wire · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Business Wire · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Business Wire · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Business Wire · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
Business Wire · 25.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Fintel · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 31.7.2026
Benzinga · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Sourcing Journal · 27.7.2026
Zacks · 27.7.2026
ChartMill · 27.7.2026
InvestorsHub · 27.7.2026
Perfect Corp. Class A Ordinary Share (PERF) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
PERF currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, PERF's estimated fair value is $2.54, which is 34.6% above the current price of $1.89. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
PERF's technical score is 39/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $2.54 vs. price $1.89 (+34.6%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.2% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -2.5% (negative); Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -15.9% / max drawdown 60.1%); Net income growth: -7.5%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PERF.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
157,400 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 217,541 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
69.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology