Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$80.41
▼ $1.46 (-1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/29 05:32 AM
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$1.04B
Day Range
$80.40 - $82.74
52-Week Range
$53.42 - $103.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$71.92
Resistance
$94.58
PDS is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+36.1% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
+1.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 6.2% / max drawdown 50.5%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Precision Drilling (PDS) demonstrates a robust overall investor score of 80, driven primarily by strong technical indicators and positive news sentiment. The technical category scores exceptionally high at 87, reflecting a clear upward momentum with the stock price consistently trading above both its 50-day and 200-day moving averages, alongside a positive MACD histogram and a healthy RSI of 57.8. These metrics suggest sustained bullish momentum, though the stochastic oscillator (%K at 48.4) remains neutral, indicating potential for further upside without immediate overbought conditions. The news category also contributes significantly with a score of 80, reflecting a mix of positive earnings reports and analyst activity, including a 155% surge in related stocks and better-than-expected Q4 financial results. However, a recent downgrade to a $72.00 target introduces a minor negative note. The risk category, however, drags the overall score down to 42, primarily due to a high maximum drawdown of 50.5% over three years and a relatively modest ATR of 3.3%, signaling volatility and potential downside risk despite a 10.1% annualized return. The declining trading volume despite price appreciation further raises concerns about potential weakening interest or liquidity issues.
The stock price is above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, the MACD histogram is positive, and the RSI (57.8) indicates healthy upward momentum, though the stochastic oscillator (%K) remains neutral.
These technical signals collectively suggest strong bullish momentum, reinforcing confidence in the stock’s short-to-medium-term outlook.
Positive news includes a 155% surge in related stocks, better-than-expected Q4 earnings, and earnings call highlights, though a recent price target reduction introduces a negative note.
Positive news drives investor sentiment and validates the stock’s fundamentals, while downgrades or mixed analyst activity can introduce uncertainty.
The stock exhibits a high historical drawdown of 50.5% over three years and a relatively low ATR (3.3%), indicating volatility and potential for significant price swings.
High volatility and drawdown risk can amplify potential losses, particularly in volatile sectors like energy, where external factors heavily influence performance.
StockIQ conclusion
Precision Drilling (PDS) presents a balanced profile with strong technical support and positive news sentiment, though its risk profile is tempered by high volatility and historical drawdowns. The stock’s ability to sustain momentum depends on maintaining trading volume, sector stability, and positive earnings execution. While the current data suggests relative strength, external factors and volatility remain key considerations for long-term investors.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
40
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
25d ago · $92.03
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $92.03
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
26d ago · $93.96
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $92.12
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
26d ago · $92.12
Evidence: 10 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
19
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Precision Drilling Corporation has primarily centered on its Q2 2026 financial performance, highlighting a year-over-year net loss despite revenue growth that exceeded analyst estimates. Analysts also adjusted their price targets downward, reflecting cautious market sentiment. The company’s earnings call discussed operational challenges amid fluctuating industry conditions, while broader energy sector trends—such as competitor performance—were briefly noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Precision Drilling Corporation. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 19 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
22
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
43
Fundamentals
—
Technical
19
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+5%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for PDS suggests a neutral-to-passive psychological state, with herding as the dominant influence due to underperformance relative to peers. The narrative-reality gap (9 points) hints at potential misalignment, but no extreme bias dominates. Anchoring near resistance (5.2%) could subtly influence decision-making, while FOMO remains muted despite positive momentum. The key question: *Will the lagging performance trigger further underperformance or attract selective buying?*
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:43 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Precision Drilling Swings to Q2 Net Loss YoY (article 6)"
"Precision Drilling Swings to Q2 Loss, Revenue Rises (article 7)"
"Argus Research lowers target price to $72.00 (article 3)"
"Precision Drilling Announces Change to Board (article 12)"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between those focused on technical momentum and those requiring deeper fundamental or cyclical analysis. Jesse Livermore and Charles Mackay, both attuned to crowd psychology and price action, see strong positive signals—Livermore detects a clear trend he’d exploit, while Mackay notes early signs of speculative excitement. In contrast, the majority of value-oriented and growth-driven investors—like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch—lack sufficient data to form a confident verdict, scoring mid-range due to insufficient balance-sheet, valuation, or growth metrics. Meanwhile, cyclical and risk-aware frameworks, such as those of Gerald Loeb and Morgan Housel, flag red flags: Loeb sees unacceptable risk, while Housel’s volatility concerns suggest this stock may unsettle patient long-term holders. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in its speculative momentum or whether its fundamentals remain too murky to justify a disciplined buy.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 37
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 16
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 288 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 10 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 19 articles.
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
MT Newswires · 16.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
MarketBeat · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
MT Newswires · 29.7.2026
MT Newswires · 29.7.2026
Zacks · 28.7.2026
Associated Press · 28.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 28.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 16.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 13.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 29.6.2026
Simply Wall St. · 24.6.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Precision Drilling Corporation (PDS) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for PDS specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
PDS's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: +1.4% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.12 (3y annualized return 6.2% / max drawdown 50.5%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for PDS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
806,855 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 823,633 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology