Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$1.14
▲ $0.11 (+10.7%)
Market data updated: 09/27 06:34 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$489.95M
Day Range
$1.01 - $1.14
52-Week Range
$0.57 - $12.95
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$0.57
Resistance
$1.26
-90.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/30 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Liquidity risk
Current ratio: 13.61
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$3.85 vs. price $1.14 (-437.4%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
19d ago · $0.90
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 28 to 60 day-over-day
What happened after
19d ago · $0.90
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 13 to 60 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
42
Value
43
Momentum
86
Risk
40
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
27
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Eightco Holdings Inc.—primarily through its subsidiary Bitmine Immersion—has focused on aggressive Ethereum (ETH) accumulation, with headlines highlighting its crypto holdings surging past $14.9 billion and nearing a 5% stake in Ethereum’s total supply. The company’s stock has seen significant jumps (up to 11% in a day) due to strategic purchases of 9,926 ETH and strong financial disclosures, including a $11.8 billion treasury. Separately, Eightco’s Worldcoin (backed by Sam Altman) raised $52.5 million for AI identity verification, though chip shortages have delayed rollout. The narrative centers on crypto-driven growth and tech diversification.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Eightco Holdings Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 17 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
40
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
28
Psychology
61
Fundamentals
27
Technical
86
Valuation
43
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+55%
Market Narrative
75
Fundamental Reality
28
Narrative Gap
+47
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ORBS’s psychology is dominated by overconfidence (85), fueled by a disconnect between price momentum (+21.5%) and deteriorating fundamentals (EPS down -12.5%). Confirmation bias (78) is amplified by a narrative-reality gap (+60), where investors prioritize positive sentiment (100/100) over deteriorating margins. FOMO (60) and euphoria (47) further embolden participation, despite muted volume (0.95x avg) and moderate volatility (1.35x ATR). The key question: *Will traders double down on momentum despite worsening fundamentals, or will reality intrude?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 08:57 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bitmine Immersion reveals $11.8B in total assets, massive share buybacks, and strong ETH yield."
"Bitmine Nears Goal of Controlling 5% of Ethereum Supply With $11.8 Billion Treasury"
"World raised $52.5 million through a Worldcoin token sale backed by major crypto investors"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ORBS reveals a clear split between value-oriented and risk-averse methodologies on one end and speculative or growth-focused frameworks on the other. Benjamin Graham’s three variants—defensive, enterprising, and general—all score perfectly, suggesting the stock meets deep value and statistical discount criteria, while Walter Bagehot’s liquidity focus reinforces its resilience in downturns. In contrast, methodologies like Peter Lynch’s, Philip Fisher’s, and Morgan Housel’s flag the stock as lacking growth potential, quality, or volatility tolerance, respectively, reflecting a mismatch between its fundamentals and their growth-at-a-reasonable-price or patient-investor principles. Even trend-following approaches like Jesse Livermore’s show moderate interest, while cyclical or behavioral frameworks—such as Howard Marks’ market-cycle analysis or Charles Mackay’s crowd-delusion warnings—caution against its speculative or overbought traits. The contrast underscores how ORBS aligns with disciplined value investing but clashes with growth, stability, or behavioral-bias frameworks.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟢 74
Positive trend — the price action Livermore looked for
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 51
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 25
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 19
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 17
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 2 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
1.6%
Operating Margin
-173.5%
Net Margin
-794.4%
EBITDA Margin
-173.4%
ROE
-112.6%
ROA
-104.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$4.14
Cash
$58.50M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
13.61
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$1.14
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$3.85
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-437.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
18.1%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 18.1% | $-12.96M | $-11.89M |
| 2 | 14.2% | $-14.80M | $-12.45M |
| 3 | 10.3% | $-16.32M | $-12.60M |
| 4 | 6.4% | $-17.36M | $-12.30M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-17.80M | $-11.57M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-10.98M
Terminal Value
$-280.64M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-182.40M
Enterprise Value
$-243.21M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$-243.21M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.68
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.33
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 17 positive, 1 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 24.9.2026
Benzinga · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
MT Newswires · 24.8.2026
Proactive · 24.8.2026
Eightco Holdings Inc. (ORBS) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ORBS currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ORBS's estimated fair value is -$3.85, which is 437.4% below the current price of $1.14. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ORBS's technical score is 86/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Current ratio: 13.61; Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$3.85 vs. price $1.14 (-437.4%); Operating margin: -173.5% (negative); Net margin: -794.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ORBS.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 6 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | $0.81 |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 1,296,485 | +50,000 | $0.81 |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Open Market Purchase | 11.6.2026 | 200,000 | +200,000 | $0.92 |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Open Market Purchase | 11.6.2026 | 1,246,485 | +200,000 | $0.92 |
| BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 86,956,513 | +86,956,513 | $0.89 |
| Foreman Louis | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Vroman Brett Earl James | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Jennings Frank D | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Lee Thomas Jong | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 4,000,000 | +4,000,000 | — |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 2,250,000 | +2,250,000 | — |
| Foreman Louis | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 2,250,000 | +2,250,000 | — |
| Vroman Brett Earl James | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Lee Thomas Jong | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 4,000,000 | +4,000,000 | — |
| Jennings Frank D | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.3.2026 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| BITMINE IMMERSION TECHNOLOGIES, INC. | Open Market Purchase | 12.3.2026 | 100,655,143 | +86,956,513 | $0.89 |
| Vroman Brett Earl James | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Jennings Frank D | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Foreman Louis | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 55,000 | +55,000 | — |
| Caiano Nicola Paul | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 475,000 | +475,000 | — |
| O'Donnell Kevin J | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 875,000 | +475,000 | — |
| Vroman Brett Earl James | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
| Caiano Nicola Paul | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 50,000 | +50,000 | — |
| Jennings Frank D | Grant/Award from Employer | 29.12.2025 | 60,000 | +60,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,546,609 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 31,124,469 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology