Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$80.85
▲ $0.88 (+1.1%)
Market data updated: 09/27 05:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/27/2026
News analyzed: 09/27/2026
Market Cap
$11.04B
Day Range
$80.08 - $82.50
52-Week Range
$73.07 - $163.13
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$76.71
Resistance
$108.39
NXT is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+10.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 20.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
54
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
58
Value
50
Momentum
22
Risk
48
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
73
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Nextpower Inc. has centered on its sustainability achievements and financial performance. The company released its 2026 Sustainability Report, highlighting a 12% reduction in Scope 3 emissions intensity and Science Based Targets initiative (SBTi) validation, reinforcing its clean energy leadership. However, reports also note declining stock performance, including a 4.5% drop and lower-than-expected EBITDA guidance, despite 8.2% revenue growth in Q2, raising investor concerns about profitability. An insider share sale was also reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Nextpower Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
73
Technical
22
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-24%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
👥 What the crowd believes
"Nextpower published its fiscal year 2026 Sustainability Report, highlighting its environmental, social, and governance (ESG) progress and a 12% reduction in Scope 3 Emissions Intensity"
"Nextpower cut EBITDA guidance despite Q2 revenue growth of 8.2%, raising questions about profit conversion"
"Nextpower (NXT) registered a bigger fall than the market (-4.55%) and is down 5.3% after cutting EBITDA guidance"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for NXT reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies prioritize risk, timing, and fundamental quality. The highest-scoring approaches—like Mackay’s skepticism of crowd mania and Marks’ cycle analysis—suggest this stock isn’t in a speculative bubble or late-cycle trap, framing it as a relatively safe bet within its market context. Meanwhile, Fisher and Veblen’s lower scores highlight doubts about its exceptional quality or sustainable profitability, while Graham’s strict valuation criteria outright reject it as too risky for even his enterprising investors. At the opposite end, Livermore and Housel’s near-zero scores flag a structural weakness: either the stock’s trend is unfavorable or its volatility would test even the most patient long-term holders, illustrating a clash between cyclical optimism and trend-following pragmatism.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 85
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 81
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 62
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 54
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 53
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 40
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 38
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 37
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 33
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
32.6%
Operating Margin
19.6%
Net Margin
16.5%
EBITDA Margin
20.4%
ROE
25.1%
ROA
14.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.96
Cash
$1.09B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.45
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$80.85
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$83.05
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+2.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
23.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 23.4% | $633.62M | $581.30M |
| 2 | 18.1% | $748.59M | $630.07M |
| 3 | 12.9% | $845.38M | $652.79M |
| 4 | 7.7% | $910.61M | $645.10M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $933.37M | $606.63M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$513.63M
Terminal Value
$14.72B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$9.57B
Enterprise Value
$12.68B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$12.68B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.29
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 10 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 26.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Benzinga · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Nextpower Inc. (NXT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 54/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NXT currently scores 54/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NXT's estimated fair value is $83.05, which is 2.7% above the current price of $80.85. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NXT's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 20.3%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 25.1% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.1% of price; Free cash flow growth: -17.4%; Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for NXT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 11 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| BOYNTON CHARLES D | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 354,000 | -4,500 | $79.98 |
| BOYNTON CHARLES D | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 4,500 | -4,500 | $79.98 |
| Blunden Julia | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 2,742 | -3,692 | $84.10 |
| Blunden Julia | Open Market Sale | 24.8.2026 | 3,692 | -3,692 | $84.10 |
| Blunden Julia | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 6,434 | -3,723 | $88.08 |
| Blunden Julia | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2026 | 3,723 | -3,723 | $88.08 |
| SHIH WILLY C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 52,698 | +2,742 | — |
| GULDNER JEFFREY B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 10,603 | +2,742 | — |
| Karuturi Monica | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 6,853 | +2,742 | — |
| Menezes Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 6,853 | +2,742 | — |
| WATKINS WILLIAM D | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 15,232 | +3,455 | — |
| Thomas Brandi Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 15,329 | +2,742 | — |
| Thomas Brandi Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 7,914 | -7,415 | $91.25 |
| Blunden Julia | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 10,157 | +2,742 | — |
| WATKINS WILLIAM D | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 3,455 | +3,455 | — |
| Blunden Julia | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| Thomas Brandi Elizabeth | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| Thomas Brandi Elizabeth | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 7,415 | -7,415 | $91.25 |
| GULDNER JEFFREY B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| SHIH WILLY C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| Karuturi Monica | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| Menezes Mark | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.8.2026 | 2,742 | +2,742 | — |
| Wenger Howard | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 11,176 | -11,176 | $104.78 |
| Wenger Howard | Open Market Sale | 11.8.2026 | 419,868 | -11,176 | $104.78 |
| SHUGAR DANIEL S | Open Market Sale | 10.8.2026 | 1,160 | -1,160 | $103.91 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
8,779,581 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 8,974,036 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology