Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$23.29
▼ $0.49 (-2.1%)
Market data updated: 09/22 06:37 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$2.48B
Day Range
$23.27 - $23.82
52-Week Range
$17.18 - $31.17
Beta
—
Next Earnings
06.11.2026
Support
$19.66
Resistance
$27.35
NOG is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
-8.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 4/29 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -15.7% / max drawdown 60.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
43
Quality
58
Value
45
Momentum
23
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
46
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. has centered on its strong stock performance and recent financial moves. The company’s shares have surged 89% over five years, with a $500 million private offering of 7.5% senior notes in August 2026 to refinance debt, alongside notable short-term gains (e.g., 28% in 30 days). Analysts debate whether the stock remains undervalued despite its recent rally. Additionally, former executive Andy Weigman—with deep experience in the Williston Basin—joined Callan Power in August 2026, highlighting the company’s historical ties to oil and gas development.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Northern Oil and Gas, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
25
Fundamentals
46
Technical
23
Valuation
45
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
49
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+10
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a narrative-reality disconnect (gap of 9) where euphoria persists despite weak momentum and underperformance relative to peers. Investors may be anchoring to the 12.5% premium above the 200-day average, ignoring short-term underperformance. The lack of panic or FOMO signals implies a cautious, detached stance—likely due to overconfidence in fundamentals or sector trends. The key question: *Will the premium above the 200-day average sustain, or will underperformance trigger a re-evaluation?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:34 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Northern Oil and Gas has delivered a strong 5-year share price gain (article 4)"
"The stock leans cheap on traditional multiples (article 4)"
"Northern Oil and Gas now valued at approximately $2.9 billion post-spin-off (article 12)"
"$500 million private offering of 7.5% senior notes to refinance borrowings (article 6)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors seeing cautious potential while others flag it as a high-risk or overvalued bet. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests no obvious signs of speculative mania, while mid-tier thinkers like Smith, Marks, and Nelson view it as mid-cycle—neither a screaming buy nor a clear sell. However, value-focused investors like Graham and Loeb dismiss it outright, citing weak defensive metrics and excessive risk, while Fisher and Lynch reject it for lacking the growth or valuation discipline they demand. Meanwhile, behavioral economists like Veblen and Housel warn of speculative tendencies or volatility that could unsettle patient investors, contrasting sharply with the more neutral or cautiously optimistic assessments from cycle-based strategists.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 60
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 45
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 43
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 39
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 32
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 32
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 24
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 17
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 6
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 284 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
80.9%
Operating Margin
9.9%
Net Margin
1.6%
EBITDA Margin
9.9%
ROE
1.8%
ROA
0.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.40
Cash
$14.30M
Total Debt
$2.40B
Current Ratio
1.09
Debt/Equity
1.13
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 29.6.2026 | $0.450 |
| 28.6.2026 | $0.450 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 29.3.2026 | $0.450 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.450 |
| 29.12.2025 | $0.450 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.450 |
| 28.9.2025 | $0.450 |
| 27.6.2025 | $0.450 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.450 |
| 28.3.2025 | $0.450 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.450 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$21.41
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$21.41
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
ChartMill · 12.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 25.8.2026
Northern Oil and Gas, Inc. (NOG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NOG currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
NOG's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; +14.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Gross margin: 80.9% — strong.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.26 (3y annualized return -15.7% / max drawdown 60.1%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -92.4%; Net income growth: -92.6%.
Yes — NOG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pomerantz Jennifer S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 3,788 | +3,788 | — |
| Kimble William F | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,410 | +2,410 | — |
| Frantz Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,410 | +2,410 | — |
| Meier Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,410 | +2,410 | — |
| Akradi Bahram | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 6,336 | +6,336 | — |
| Lasher Stuart G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 2,410 | +2,410 | — |
| Akradi Bahram | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 25,760 | +25,760 | $19.40 |
| Akradi Bahram | Open Market Purchase | 22.6.2026 | 1,713,444 | +25,760 | $19.40 |
| Lasher Stuart G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,496 | +1,496 | — |
| Frantz Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,496 | +1,496 | — |
| EASLEY ROY ERNEST | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,496 | +1,496 | — |
| Pomerantz Jennifer S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 2,351 | +2,351 | — |
| Akradi Bahram | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 3,933 | +3,933 | — |
| Kimble William F | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,496 | +1,496 | — |
| Meier Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,496 | +1,496 | — |
| Meier Lisa | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 59,430 | +1,496 | — |
| Akradi Bahram | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 1,687,684 | +3,933 | — |
| EASLEY ROY ERNEST | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 86,666 | +1,496 | — |
| Kimble William F | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 19,259 | +1,496 | — |
| Frantz Michael A | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 64,731 | +1,496 | — |
| Lasher Stuart G. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 67,689 | +1,496 | — |
| Pomerantz Jennifer S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 31.3.2026 | 25,129 | +2,351 | — |
| Allen Chad W | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.3.2026 | 6,069 | -6,069 | $27.51 |
| Allen Chad W | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 13,850 | +13,850 | — |
| Romslo Erik J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2026 | 107,548 | +10,839 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
21,715,906 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 20,482,402 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology