Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$77.76
▼ $1.23 (-1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/29 02:59 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$7.39B
Day Range
$77.70 - $79.42
52-Week Range
$75.17 - $97.06
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$77.70
Resistance
$84.99
NFG is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-17.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 10/32 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 576.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $3.06 vs. price $77.76 (-96.1%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (79/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (43/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
68
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🔎 What Changed (vs. 30 days ago)
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
68
$82.14
Now
53
$77.76
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
79
Quality
58
Value
43
Momentum
13
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
68
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of National Fuel Gas Company has primarily focused on its resilience amid broader industry challenges, particularly within the U.S. integrated energy sector. Analysts highlight the company’s ability to navigate headwinds like slowing production growth, high feedstock costs, and rising renewable competition due to its cost efficiency and diversified operations. Stock performance and earnings reports have also been scrutinized, with brief mentions of its positioning alongside peers like Occidental and ConocoPhillips. No company-specific operational or financial details beyond these themes are explicitly noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about National Fuel Gas Company. News trend score: 100. Reason: 11 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
31
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
98
Fundamentals
68
Technical
13
Valuation
43
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior reflects a fixation on resistance, where traders may hesitate to push past 1.7% above it. Herding and overconfidence coexist, but weak momentum and extreme valuation (+2641% DCF) dampen euphoria. The narrative-reality gap (26 points) hints at optimism outpacing fundamentals. The key question: will traders break resistance or anchor tighter as valuation strains?
Updated: 09/08/2026, 10:23 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) remains a Buy, supported by ... a 56-year dividend increase streak"
"ConocoPhillips, Occidental and National Fuel Gas could weather oil and gas headwinds through low costs and integrated operations"
"Slowing production growth ... are making the prospects for the Zacks Oil & Gas US Integrated industry gloomy. ConocoPhillips, Occidental and National Fuel are well-positioned to survive the challenges"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for this stock reflects a clash between growth-oriented methodologies and more conservative, valuation-driven frameworks. Peter Lynch, Philip Fisher, and Thorstein Veblen all see strong potential, with Lynch and Fisher highlighting its growth and quality as undervalued opportunities, while Veblen aligns with real-value creation. Meanwhile, the Graham-based approaches—both Defensive and Enterprising Investor—reject it outright, citing valuation and risk concerns, while Walter Bagehot and Jack Schwager flag liquidity and setup deficiencies. Even patient compounders like Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith find merit, contrasting sharply with Livermore’s trend-following caution and Marks’ risk/valuation warnings. The middle-ground scores from Malkiel/Bogle and Howard Marks (cycle) suggest ambiguity, but the extremes—from Fisher’s 84 to Schwager’s 9—underscore how this stock’s appeal hinges entirely on whether one prioritizes qualitative growth or quantitative safety.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 99
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 87
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 84
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 77
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 66
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 37
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 32
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 22
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 14
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$77.70
Range Bottom
$84.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
90.6%
Operating Margin
35.7%
Net Margin
22.8%
EBITDA Margin
55.8%
ROE
16.8%
ROA
5.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.73
Cash
$43.17M
Total Debt
$2.68B
Current Ratio
0.44
Debt/Equity
0.87
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.555 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.555 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.535 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.535 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.535 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.535 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.535 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.535 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.535 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.535 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.515 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.515 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$77.76
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$3.06
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-96.1%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.0% | $190.96M | $175.19M |
| 2 | 2.1% | $195.02M | $164.15M |
| 3 | 2.3% | $199.42M | $153.99M |
| 4 | 2.4% | $204.15M | $144.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $209.26M | $136.00M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$187.21M
Terminal Value
$3.30B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.14B
Enterprise Value
$2.92B
Net Debt
$2.64B
Equity Value
$278.94M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$33.92
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$33.86
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 11 positive, 8 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 27.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MT Newswires · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Business Wire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
National Fuel Gas Company (NFG) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NFG currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NFG's estimated fair value is $3.06, which is 96.1% below the current price of $77.76. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NFG's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 576.2%; Free cash flow growth: 39.0%; Net income growth: 568.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $3.06 vs. price $77.76 (-96.1%); Current ratio: 0.44; Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — NFG has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bauer David P | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 288,337 | +4,907 | — |
| Silverstein Timothy J | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 8,288 | +216 | — |
| Colpoys Michael D | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 14,260 | +396 | — |
| Bauer David P | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 72,047 | -4,907 | — |
| Del Vecchio Joseph N | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 16,445 | -16 | $81.52 |
| Del Vecchio Joseph N | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 16,461 | +444 | — |
| Krebs Martin A | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 4,164 | -478 | — |
| Krebs Martin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 4,642 | +478 | — |
| Loweth Justin I | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 77,853 | +2,784 | — |
| Krebs Martin A | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 26,283 | +478 | — |
| Mendel Elena G | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 13,781 | +236 | — |
| Del Vecchio Joseph N | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 19,525 | +428 | — |
| Hartz Lee E | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 17,424 | -119 | $81.52 |
| Bauer David P | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 77,135 | +5,088 | — |
| Del Vecchio Joseph N | Disposition to the Company | 16.9.2026 | 16,017 | -428 | — |
| Silverstein Timothy J | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 8,177 | -111 | $81.52 |
| Bauer David P | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 76,954 | -181 | $81.52 |
| Loweth Justin I | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 76,757 | -1,096 | $81.52 |
| Hartz Lee E | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.9.2026 | 17,544 | +232 | — |
| Mendel Elena G | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 13,660 | -121 | $81.52 |
| Colpoys Michael D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.9.2026 | 14,065 | -195 | $81.52 |
| Krebs Martin A | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 4,164 | +29 | $79.74 |
| Bauer David P | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 283,430 | +1,953 | $79.99 |
| Krebs Martin A | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 25,805 | +178 | $79.99 |
| Mendel Elena G | Other Transaction | 15.7.2026 | 13,545 | +93 | $79.74 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,068,195 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 4,922,028 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology