Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$42.61
▼ $0.21 (-0.5%)
Market data updated: 09/29 02:59 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/29/2026
News analyzed: 09/29/2026
Market Cap
$6.80B
Day Range
$42.58 - $43.51
52-Week Range
$26.70 - $54.98
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$39.02
Resistance
$48.51
NE is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+45.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $59.44 vs. price $42.61 (+39.5%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -5.6% / max drawdown 64.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
48
Quality
63
Value
62
Momentum
23
Risk
54
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
58
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Noble Corporation plc (NE) has been limited and indirect, primarily focusing on broader industry trends rather than the company itself. Most headlines mention it as part of unrelated lists—such as "unpopular stocks deserving attention" or "market-beating picks"—without specific details about Noble’s performance. One minor mention notes National Energy Services (a competitor) reporting better-than-expected Q4 results, but no direct coverage of Noble’s financials or recent developments exists. Thus, no substantive insights about the company’s recent activities can be derived from these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Noble Corporation plc A. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
17
Fundamentals
58
Technical
23
Valuation
62
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for NE suggests a narrative-reality gap (6-point divergence) with no dominant psychological state, as all scores hover near zero or are contradictory. High news sentiment (92/100) contrasts sharply with the stock’s 23% discount to DCF fair value, indicating detached optimism from fundamentals. The lack of herding (underperformance vs. peers) and minimal panic signals imply cautious, non-emotional positioning. The key question: *Is the positive sentiment a misalignment with valuation, or will fundamentals justify the narrative?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:52 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"National Energy Services shares are trading higher after the company reported better-than-expected Q4 financial results."
"NE: Raising target price to $43.00"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 21/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some legendary investors seeing strong potential while others flag significant red flags. The highest scores come from Edgar Lawrence Smith (74), who would view it as a long-term 'buy and hold' candidate, and Charles Mackay (72), who dismisses crowd-driven mania—suggesting a rational opportunity. Meanwhile, Howard Marks (66) and Morgan Housel (64) balance risk and reward, finding it holdable but not effortless, while Walter Bagehot (63) and Samuel Armstrong Nelson (63) note adequate liquidity and mid-cycle positioning. However, the split becomes stark: Jesse Livermore (39) and Thorstein Veblen (21) reject it outright, with Livermore’s trend-following discipline and Veblen’s critique of speculative growth driving their negative verdicts. Even Graham’s conservative approach (51) and the efficient-market view (50) find it unconvincing, while Philip Fisher (58) and Gerald Loeb (54) see only moderate merit—highlighting how the stock’s appeal hinges on whether one prioritizes long-term conviction or strict risk controls.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 74
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 63
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 58
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 51
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 44
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 40
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 38
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 22
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
12.6%
Net Margin
6.6%
EBITDA Margin
12.6%
ROE
4.8%
ROA
2.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.36
Cash
$471.40M
Total Debt
$1.98B
Current Ratio
1.67
Debt/Equity
0.43
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 3.9.2026 | $0.500 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.500 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.500 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.500 |
| 3.3.2026 | $0.500 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.500 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.500 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 4.6.2025 | $0.500 |
| 5.3.2025 | $0.500 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$42.61
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$59.44
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+39.5%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $540.19M | $495.59M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $644.86M | $542.76M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $733.52M | $566.42M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $793.12M | $561.87M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $812.95M | $528.36M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$432.15M
Terminal Value
$12.82B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$8.33B
Enterprise Value
$11.03B
Net Debt
$1.50B
Equity Value
$9.52B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$28.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$28.39
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 28.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Barrons.com · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 15.8.2026
StockStory · 13.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Noble Corporation plc A (NE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
NE currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, NE's estimated fair value is $59.44, which is 39.5% above the current price of $42.61. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
NE's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $59.44 vs. price $42.61 (+39.5%); Free cash flow growth: 439.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.09 (3y annualized return -5.6% / max drawdown 64.0%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -54.4%; Net income growth: -51.7%.
Yes — NE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Eifler Robert W. | Gift | 4.9.2026 | 1,172,078 | -21,750 | — |
| Eifler Robert W. | Gift | 4.9.2026 | 21,750 | -21,750 | — |
| Eifler Robert W. | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 17,071 | -17,071 | $45.71 |
| Eifler Robert W. | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 32,929 | -32,929 | $45.40 |
| Hirshberg Al J. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 1,500 | -1,500 | $52.60 |
| Hirshberg Al J. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 3,500 | -3,500 | $52.63 |
| Hirshberg Al J. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 29,303 | -3,500 | $52.63 |
| Hirshberg Al J. | Open Market Sale | 15.5.2026 | 27,803 | -1,500 | $52.60 |
| SLEDGE CHARLES M | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 724 | -724 | $51.61 |
| SLEDGE CHARLES M | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 1,360 | -724 | $51.61 |
| Denton Blake | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $49.31 |
| Denton Blake | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 29,927 | -30,000 | $49.31 |
| Kawaja Joey M | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 40,000 | -40,000 | $49.86 |
| Kawaja Joey M | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 40,071 | -40,000 | $49.86 |
| Howard Jennie | Open Market Sale | 30.4.2026 | 2,486 | -2,486 | $51.08 |
| Howard Jennie | Open Market Sale | 30.4.2026 | 15,676 | -2,486 | $51.08 |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 2,433 | -2,433 | — |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 3,649 | +3,649 | — |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 3,649 | -3,649 | $50.95 |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 15,810 | +3,649 | — |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 2,433 | -3,649 | $50.95 |
| HOLTH KRISTIN | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 29.4.2026 | 0 | -2,433 | — |
| ALTING CAROLINE | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 15,340 | -15,340 | $52.75 |
| ALTING CAROLINE | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 8,170 | -15,340 | $52.75 |
| Barker Richard B. | Open Market Sale | 18.3.2026 | 102,839 | -102,839 | $46.43 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
14,695,060 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 14,549,834 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
66.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 80.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology