Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.30
▲ $0.12 (+3.8%)
Market data updated: 09/28 05:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$120.48M
Day Range
$3.18 - $3.39
52-Week Range
$2.18 - $9.86
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$2.72
Resistance
$4.10
MX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+3.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 43.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$18.14 vs. price $3.30 (-649.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
4d ago · $3.22
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 12 to 41 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
54
Quality
47
Value
43
Momentum
54
Risk
46
Sentiment
98
Fundamental
31
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation has primarily focused on its Q2 2026 earnings performance, where the company missed revenue estimates but exceeded earnings per share (EPS) expectations. Weak guidance for Q3, attributed to supply chain challenges, led to a 3% stock decline post-earnings. Analysts highlighted ongoing industry headwinds amid broader semiconductor sector trends. No other notable company-specific developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation. News trend score: 98. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
55
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
63
Fundamentals
31
Technical
54
Valuation
43
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
73
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant Loss Aversion (82) reflects a market deeply entrenched in risk aversion, with the 48.7% three-month drop anchoring behavior. Herding (56) indicates passive alignment with peers, but without conviction—evidenced by identical +1.0% moves. Confirmation bias (21) may distort perception of fundamentals, as the narrative gap (+16) outweighs weak revenue/margin trends. The key question: will traders exit to lock in losses or hold for a rebound, given muted volume and neutral RSI? The absence of panic selling (15) suggests no extreme distress, but the low Overconfidence (0) and Euphoria (17) scores imply cautious, not aggressive, positioning.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Magnachip Semiconductor missed Q2 revenue estimates"
"Weak Q3 guidance sent shares down 3% after-hours"
"supply chain headwinds"
"beat EPS expectations"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 7/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on the documented principles of classic value investors such as Graham and Bagehot, the model estimates that MX scores perfectly, indicating strong liquidity, deep discount, and favorable cycle position. Mid‑range scores from Marks, Mackay, Veblen and Lynch suggest a generally positive view but flag concerns about cycle timing, crowd dynamics and that growth may already be priced in. Scores in the 40‑60 range from Loeb, Schwager, the efficient‑market advocates and Smith reflect moderate risk and a limited edge over a broad index. At the opposite extreme, Livermore and Fisher’s very low scores arise because the stock’s trend is negative and it lacks the quality‑growth hallmarks those investors required.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 64
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 61
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 56
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 53
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 38
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 38
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 19
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 7
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.6%
Operating Margin
-20.0%
Net Margin
-16.6%
EBITDA Margin
-12.8%
ROE
-12.0%
ROA
-8.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.82
Cash
$103.76M
Total Debt
$44.60M
Current Ratio
4.07
Debt/Equity
0.18
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.30
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$18.14
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-649.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $-51.49M | $-47.24M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $-49.88M | $-41.98M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $-49.26M | $-38.04M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $-49.57M | $-35.11M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-50.80M | $-33.02M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-54.20M
Terminal Value
$-801.15M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-520.69M
Enterprise Value
$-716.08M
Net Debt
$-59.16M
Equity Value
$-656.92M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$6.85
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$6.84
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 8 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
ChartMill · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
InvestorsHub · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
MT Newswires · 21.9.2026
Business Wire · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 21.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 20.8.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
Moby · 30.7.2026
Magnachip Semiconductor Corporation (MX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
MX currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, MX's estimated fair value is -$18.14, which is 649.6% below the current price of $3.30. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
MX's technical score is 54/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 43.1%; Net income growth: 45.3%; Debt/equity: 0.18.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$18.14 vs. price $3.30 (-649.6%); Operating margin: -20.0% (negative); Net margin: -16.6% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for MX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 7 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LEE CHAE | Open Market Purchase | 24.9.2026 | 388,750 | +20,000 | $3.22 |
| LEE CHAE | Open Market Purchase | 23.9.2026 | 368,750 | +30,000 | $3.19 |
| LEE CHAE | Open Market Purchase | 23.9.2026 | 338,750 | +50,000 | $3.17 |
| MARTINO CAMILLO | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 410,661 | +6,764 | — |
| MARTINO CAMILLO | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2026 | 6,764 | +6,764 | — |
| Chung Kyo-Hwa Liz | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 48,810 | +48,810 | — |
| Amoruso Cristiano | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 46,429 | +46,429 | — |
| MARTINO CAMILLO | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 39,286 | +39,286 | — |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 51,191 | +51,191 | — |
| MARTINO CAMILLO | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 403,897 | +39,286 | — |
| Amoruso Cristiano | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 75,057 | +46,429 | — |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 265,682 | +51,191 | — |
| Chung Kyo-Hwa Liz | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.8.2026 | 149,599 | +48,810 | — |
| LEE CHAE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 288,750 | +288,750 | — |
| LEE CHAE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 148,750 | +148,750 | — |
| LEE CHAE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 288,750 | +288,750 | — |
| LEE CHAE | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 148,750 | +148,750 | — |
| Lee Seunghoon | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Park Shinyoung | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 112,500 | +112,500 | — |
| Lee Seunghoon | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 158,201 | +30,000 | — |
| Park Shinyoung | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 327,954 | +112,500 | — |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 21,994 | +21,994 | $2.87 |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Open Market Purchase | 16.3.2026 | 158,200 | +21,994 | $2.87 |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 13,006 | +13,006 | $2.79 |
| NATHAN GILBERT E | Open Market Purchase | 13.3.2026 | 136,206 | +13,006 | $2.79 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,212,466 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,312,990 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology