Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$36.81
▼ $1.13 (-3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/20 07:32 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$8.38B
Day Range
$36.73 - $37.79
52-Week Range
$31.33 - $45.75
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$36.73
Resistance
$45.11
LINE is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-9.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/31 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 88.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$12.83 vs. price $36.81 (-134.9%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
34
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
28
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Lineage, Inc.** has centered on its stock performance and analyst sentiment amid broader real estate investment trust (REIT) trends. Analysts like RBC Capital, Citigroup, and Wells Fargo have adjusted price targets upward ($48, $43, and $38, respectively), citing improving industry conditions and the company’s potential benefits from a recovering REIT sector. However, Piper Sandler lowered its target to $44 while maintaining a neutral rating. The focus also includes broader REIT earnings season challenges, with Lineage not explicitly highlighted as a laggard. No major company-specific developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Lineage, Inc.. News trend score: 62. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
36
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
28
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
36
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
LINE’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (82), where traders appear fixated on the 0.9% support level, likely due to its proximity. Loss aversion (30) hints at hesitation to crystallize losses, while muted panic (28) and low volatility (0.82x ATR) suggest restrained selling. The narrative gap (3) is narrow, implying limited disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals. The key question: will traders break support or hold near 0.9% as a psychological anchor?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:39 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"RBC Capital raises price target on Lineage to $48 from $44"
"Piper Sandler maintains Neutral on Lineage, lowers price target to $44"
"Lineage seen benefiting from improving industry conditions"
"Lineage insider bought shares worth $826,638"
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides historical methodologies sharply, with some models seeing it as a high-conviction opportunity while others dismiss it outright. The top scorers—Samuel Armstrong Nelson (99) and Charles Mackay (95)—view it as a cyclical or crowd-resistant play, respectively, suggesting it’s either near a bottom or immune to speculative bubbles. In contrast, the lowest scorers—Jesse Livermore (18) and Walter Bagehot (23)—flag it as a trend reversal or liquidity risk, warning against its current momentum or fragility. Mid-tier investors like Howard Marks (78) and Jack Schwager (66) strike a cautious balance, acknowledging potential but tempering enthusiasm with concerns about valuation or risk, while value-focused thinkers like Philip Fisher (34) and Gerald Loeb (33) outright reject it for lacking their signature traits. The divide reflects a tension between growth/cycle optimism and risk-averse or fundamental skepticism.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 58
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 55
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 55
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 47
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 36
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 33
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 23
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 16
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
32.1%
Operating Margin
3.4%
Net Margin
-1.9%
EBITDA Margin
20.1%
ROE
-1.2%
ROA
-0.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.43
Cash
$66.00M
Total Debt
$6.11B
Current Ratio
0.80
Debt/Equity
0.74
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.6.2026 | $0.533 |
| 29.6.2026 | $0.533 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.533 |
| 30.3.2026 | $0.533 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.528 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.528 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.528 |
| 29.9.2025 | $0.528 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.528 |
| 29.6.2025 | $0.528 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.528 |
| 30.3.2025 | $0.528 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$36.81
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$12.83
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-134.9%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
2.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2.9% | $201.65M | $185.00M |
| 2 | 2.8% | $207.27M | $174.45M |
| 3 | 2.7% | $212.84M | $164.35M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $218.37M | $154.70M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $223.83M | $145.47M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$196.00M
Terminal Value
$3.53B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$2.29B
Enterprise Value
$3.12B
Net Debt
$6.04B
Equity Value
$-2.93B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$36.17
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$16.18
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 6 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Motley Fool · 10.9.2026
MT Newswires · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
The Fly · 9.9.2026
The Fly · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 9.9.2026
MT Newswires · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Benzinga · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Lineage, Inc. (LINE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LINE currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, LINE's estimated fair value is -$12.83, which is 134.9% below the current price of $36.81. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
LINE's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 88.4%; Free cash flow growth: 1533.3%; Net income growth: 84.9%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$12.83 vs. price $36.81 (-134.9%); Net margin: -1.9% (negative); Operating margin is eroding over time.
Yes — LINE has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 3 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Marchetti Kevin Patrick | Open Market Purchase | 28.8.2026 | 25,000 | +25,000 | $39.50 |
| LeMasters Robb A. | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 20,000 | +20,000 | $41.33 |
| LeMasters Robb A. | Open Market Purchase | 7.8.2026 | 49,500 | +20,000 | $41.33 |
| ARCHAMBEAU SHELLYE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 4,490 | +4,490 | — |
| Wentworth Lynn A | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 4,490 | +4,490 | — |
| Turner Michael John | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 4,490 | +4,490 | — |
| Falotico Nancy Joy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 4,490 | +4,490 | — |
| ARCHAMBEAU SHELLYE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 12,112 | +4,490 | — |
| Wentworth Lynn A | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 17,226 | +4,490 | — |
| Falotico Nancy Joy | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 18,517 | +4,490 | — |
| Turner Michael John | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.6.2026 | 11,612 | +4,490 | — |
| Fleming Abigail S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.4.2026 | 205 | -205 | $35.55 |
| Fleming Abigail S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 24.4.2026 | 18,277 | -205 | $35.55 |
| Fleming Abigail S | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 12,203 | +12,203 | — |
| Fleming Abigail S | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 276 | -276 | $32.76 |
| McGowan Brian Jeffrey | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 676 | -676 | $32.76 |
| Bryan Gregory A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 13,118 | +13,118 | — |
| Bryan Gregory A. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 2,137 | -2,137 | $32.76 |
| McGowan Brian Jeffrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 28,799 | +28,799 | — |
| Thattai Sudarsan V | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 32,947 | +32,947 | — |
| Bryan Gregory A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 13,118 | +13,118 | — |
| Matsler Natalie | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 25,626 | +25,626 | — |
| Smith Timothy Conrad | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 20,745 | +20,745 | — |
| Burlage Kelly | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 1,220 | +1,220 | — |
| Burlage Kelly | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 1,516 | -1,516 | $32.76 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,483,374 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,224,296 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology