Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$19.33
▲ $0.22 (+1.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:41 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$19.05 - $19.60
52-Week Range
$10.69 - $34.48
Beta
—
Next Earnings
14.10.2026
Support
$15.85
Resistance
$26.32
LBRT is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+73.8% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 5.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
43
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
9d ago · $22.06
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 2 to 39 day-over-day
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
21
Risk
40
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
47
Institutional
12
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent coverage of Liberty Energy Inc. centers on its equity performance and valuation. Articles note a 79‑80% share gain over the past year and a roughly 80% rise over five years, prompting analysts to question whether earnings and rising debt justify the premium price. The CFO’s 6,666‑share sale under a Rule 10b5‑1 plan and a partnership extension with Tamboran Resources for Beetaloo gas commissioning are also highlighted. Additionally, the stock’s rally was tied to broader oil‑price spikes after attacks on Saudi facilities.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Liberty Energy Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
47
Technical
21
Valuation
50
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
52
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
LBRT’s dominant **Loss Aversion** (61) reflects a prolonged drawdown (-27.6% in 3 months) where investors hesitate to lock in losses despite neutral volume. The **Confirmation Bias** (8) and **Overconfidence** (7) signals suggest selective optimism—price momentum outpaces weak fundamentals, while a narrative gap (+6) may reinforce existing views. The absence of panic or euphoria indicates a cautious, risk-averse stance. The key question: *Will the recent underperformance vs. peers (+1.0% vs. +1.6%) trigger a shift toward herd behavior or deeper loss aversion?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 08:30 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Piper Sandler analyst Derek Podhaizer maintains Liberty Energy (NYSE:LBRT) with an Overweight rating and lowers the price target from $34 to $30."
"Liberty Energy shares fell alongside others as crude oil prices pulled back after two weeks of gains."
"Liberty Energy targets a 3 GW data center power buildout while defending its frac growth strategy."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 3D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 83/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some seeing it as a long-term opportunity while others flag it as risky or overvalued. The highest scores come from Charles Mackay (92), who sees no crowd mania, and Howard Marks (82), who views it as early-to-mid cycle—both suggesting it’s a measured play rather than a speculative bubble. Meanwhile, investors like Edgar Lawrence Smith (69) and even a more cautious Howard Marks (76) lean bullish, framing it as a ‘buy and hold’ or reasonably priced risk. In contrast, the lowest scores—from Fisher (29), Veblen (23), and Livermore (33)—reject it outright, with Fisher dismissing its growth quality and Veblen warning of speculative excess, while Livermore’s trend-following discipline would avoid it entirely. The middle ground, including Graham (46) and Bagehot (45), remains lukewarm, questioning whether it meets strict valuation or liquidity standards, while efficient-market theorists (41) see no clear edge over passive investing.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 83
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 69
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 51
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 45
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 39
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 33
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 29
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 23
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 15
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
20.9%
Operating Margin
1.8%
Net Margin
3.7%
EBITDA Margin
14.3%
ROE
7.1%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.91
Cash
$27.55M
Total Debt
$246.61M
Current Ratio
1.22
Debt/Equity
0.12
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.090 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.090 |
| 3.6.2026 | $0.090 |
| 4.3.2026 | $0.090 |
| 3.3.2026 | $0.090 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.090 |
| 3.12.2025 | $0.090 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.080 |
| 3.9.2025 | $0.080 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.080 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.080 |
| 6.3.2025 | $0.080 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.57
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$12.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
StockStory · 9.9.2026
Proactive · 2.9.2026
MT Newswires · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
StockStory · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 28.8.2026
StockStory · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
MarketBeat · 21.8.2026
MT Newswires · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Liberty Energy Inc. (LBRT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 43/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
LBRT currently scores 43/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
LBRT's technical score is 21/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.12; Debt/equity: 0.12.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 5.1% of price; Calmar: 0.04 (3y annualized return 2.3% / max drawdown 59.5%); Revenue growth (last year): -7.2%.
Yes — LBRT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 15 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.9.2026 | 6,666 | -6,666 | $19.84 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 3,333 | -3,333 | $20.00 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 767,045 | -3,333 | $20.00 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 3,333 | -3,333 | $17.95 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 770,378 | -3,333 | $17.95 |
| Murti Arjun N | Open Market Purchase | 28.7.2026 | 14,053.317 | +14,053.317 | $17.79 |
| Murti Arjun N | Open Market Purchase | 28.7.2026 | 41,621 | +14,053 | $17.79 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 9,999 | -9,999 | $25.89 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.7.2026 | 773,711 | -9,999 | $25.89 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 3,333 | -3,333 | $31.00 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 2.6.2026 | 783,710 | -3,333 | $31.00 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 13,332 | -13,332 | $29.46 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 787,043 | -13,332 | $29.46 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 19,998 | -19,998 | $33.48 |
| Stock Michael | Open Market Sale | 20.5.2026 | 800,375 | -19,998 | $33.48 |
| Kimble William F | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 7,350 | -7,350 | $33.92 |
| Kimble William F | Open Market Sale | 5.5.2026 | 89,805 | -7,350 | $33.92 |
| Gosney Ryan T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 11,430 | -11,430 | $27.92 |
| ELLIOTT R SEAN | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 42,050 | +42,050 | — |
| Gosney Ryan T | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 26,124 | +26,124 | — |
| Gusek Ron | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 102,914 | +102,914 | — |
| Stock Michael | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 45,025 | -45,025 | $27.92 |
| Gusek Ron | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 45,025 | -45,025 | $27.92 |
| ELLIOTT R SEAN | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.4.2026 | 16,547 | -16,547 | $27.92 |
| Stock Michael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 102,914 | +102,914 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,087,529 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 14,310,623 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 63.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology