Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$11.30
▲ $0.05 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/20 10:14 PM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$384.71M
Day Range
$11.19 - $11.38
52-Week Range
$8.00 - $11.78
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.12.2026
Support
$10.00
Resistance
$11.76
+27.4% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
KNOP carries an investorScore of 79 and a STRONG rating, driven primarily by robust technical indicators and modestly positive news sentiment, while risk metrics temper the enthusiasm. The technical profile is the strongest contributor, scoring 87, because the stock trades above both its 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, shows a positive MACD histogram indicating rising momentum, and maintains a healthy RSI of 59.7, suggesting balanced upward pressure without overbought conditions. The %K reading of 60.7 sits in a neutral range, reinforcing the overall steady momentum. News sentiment is mixed but leans positive, earning a 74 score; two neutral peer‑comparison pieces and two neutral earnings call transcripts are offset by a positive article arguing the stock is undervalued, hinting at potential upside perception among analysts. Risk assessment yields a middling 50 score, reflecting an ATR of 3.4% of price—implying moderate daily volatility—and a Calmar ratio of 0.51, which combines a solid three‑year annualized return of 20.1% with a sizable maximum drawdown of 39.2%. The overall 79 score balances the bullish technicals and encouraging news against the moderate volatility and drawdown risk, resulting in a rating that acknowledges strength while recognizing the need for caution.
Price is above the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, MACD histogram is positive, RSI is 59.7, and %K is 60.7 (neutral range).
These signals indicate strong, sustainable upward momentum with limited overbought risk.
Coverage includes neutral peer‑comparison articles and earnings call transcripts, plus one positive piece suggesting undervaluation.
Positive sentiment can boost investor confidence, while neutral content tempers expectations.
ATR equals 3.4% of price and Calmar ratio is 0.51, reflecting a 20.1% three‑year return with a 39.2% maximum drawdown.
Higher volatility and drawdown potential increase downside risk for investors.
StockIQ conclusion
KNOP’s strong technical foundation and modestly positive news drive its high investorScore, while moderate volatility and drawdown risk keep the rating balanced. Investors should weigh the solid momentum against the inherent risk factors and remain aware of external conditions that could shift the stock’s outlook.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
72
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
2d ago · $11.26
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
2d ago · $11.26
Evidence: 7 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $11.23
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
6d ago · $11.23
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $11.23
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
7d ago · $11.23
Evidence: 9 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $11.37
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
10d ago · $11.37
Evidence: 10 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
16d ago · $11.49
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
16d ago · $11.49
Evidence: 11 bullish / 0 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
19d ago · $10.80
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of September 1, 2026
Then
81
$10.80
Now
72
$11.30
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
75
Risk
50
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) has centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings call**, highlighting a **$0.075 per unit increase in quarterly distributions** alongside a **modern vessel acquisition** to bolster its fleet. The company reported **strong financials**, including $96.8M revenue, $57.6M adjusted EBITDA, and high vessel utilization, though analysts also noted **slim margins, heavy debt, and fleet aging risks** as long-term concerns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about KNOT Offshore Partners LP. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
19
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
—
Technical
75
Valuation
—
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+10%
Market Narrative
57
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for KNOP suggests traders are strongly anchored near resistance at 1.1% below, while FOMO and mild euphoria coexist due to momentum and positive sentiment. The narrative gap (60 vs. 50) hints at optimism exceeding fundamentals, but no clear panic or herding signals exist. The key question: will traders break resistance or double down on the anchor? The overbought RSI (72) may signal caution, but momentum and volume remain supportive.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:44 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"raises quarterly cash distribution to $0.075 per unit"
"high vessel utilization and additional charter activity"
"strengthens its fleet with the acquisition of a modern vessel"
"slim margins, heavy debt, and aging fleet risks"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 15D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 80/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The historical models display a clear divide on KNOP, driven primarily by contrasting views on market cycles and data availability. On the optimistic end, Thorstein Veblen's framework yields an 80 score as the model estimates growth is aligned with tangible value creation, while Charles Mackay detects early crowd excitement. Conversely, cycle-focused and momentum methodologies express significant caution; Samuel Armstrong Nelson and Morgan Housel both evaluate the stock at 20, citing overbought conditions and shaking volatility, which aligns with Howard Marks's cycle assessment warning of late-stage risk. Meanwhile, several core value and growth models—including Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, and Peter Lynch—render neutral 50 scores because the simulation detects insufficient fundamental data for a conclusive reading.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 53
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 33
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 31
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 16
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 27.7.2026 | $0.075 |
| 26.7.2026 | $0.075 |
| 27.4.2026 | $0.050 |
| 26.4.2026 | $0.050 |
| 26.1.2026 | $0.026 |
| 25.1.2026 | $0.026 |
| 27.10.2025 | $0.026 |
| 26.10.2025 | $0.026 |
| 28.7.2025 | $0.026 |
| 27.7.2025 | $0.026 |
| 28.4.2025 | $0.026 |
| 27.4.2025 | $0.026 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Motley Fool · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Zacks · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Moby · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
MarketBeat · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Associated Press · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Business Wire · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for KNOT Offshore Partners LP (KNOP) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for KNOP specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
KNOP's technical score is 75/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 59.6 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — KNOP has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 2 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Seglem Trygve | Open Market Purchase | 15.6.2026 | 1,250,000 | +1,250,000 | $20.00 |
| Seglem Trygve | Open Market Purchase | 15.6.2026 | 1,458,333 | +1,250,000 | $20.00 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
84,206 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 92,972 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology