Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$37.24
▼ $0.29 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/28 09:51 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/28/2026
News analyzed: 09/28/2026
Market Cap
$3.19B
Day Range
$36.66 - $37.61
52-Week Range
$20.57 - $42.93
Beta
—
Next Earnings
22.10.2026
Support
$32.16
Resistance
$40.82
KN is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
+59.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 118.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
-12.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (45/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
65
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
63
Value
45
Momentum
73
Risk
62
Sentiment
74
Fundamental
66
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Knowles Corporation has primarily centered on investor caution and internal activity. Analysts debate its fair value, with some warning of risks and suggesting alternatives, while others highlight its growth in specialty electronic components and a target of 30% profit margins. Insider selling, including a director’s $260K stock sale and another insider’s $1.56M disposition, has drawn attention, alongside a recent stock price uptick. No major operational or strategic shifts are explicitly mentioned.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Knowles Corporation. News trend score: 74. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
53
Fundamentals
66
Technical
73
Valuation
45
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-10%
Market Narrative
60
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for KN suggests a dominant narrative gap where euphoria (score: 19) and overconfidence (score: 9) are most active, driven by strong momentum (+4.7% ROC) and positive sentiment (92/100). The narrative gap (24 points) implies traders are pricing in optimism far beyond fundamentals, as price momentum (+4.7%) outpaces EPS growth (+1.2%). FOMO (score: 18) may also be present, but euphoria’s alignment with momentum and sentiment suggests traders are embracing gains rather than chasing. The key open question: *Is this momentum sustainable, or will the gap between narrative and fundamentals widen?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 06:35 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Knowles Director Shavers sells $260,000 worth of stock (Article 4)"
"Knowles targets 30% margins as specialty components drive growth (Article 6)"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect a stark contrast between bullish, growth-oriented methodologies and more cautious or cyclical frameworks. Walter Bagehot’s high score and verdict highlight its strong liquidity and resilience in credit crises, suggesting a defensive anchor for conservative investors. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s enthusiasm for its growth potential—where the stock’s price hasn’t yet reflected its upward trajectory—aligns with value-growth hybrid approaches, though Charles Mackay’s lower score hints at early signs of speculative fervor. On the other end, methodologies like Benjamin Graham’s and Jack Schwager’s wizards’ discipline flag fundamental weaknesses or technical misalignments, dismissing it outright as either statistically overpriced or lacking a clear trend. Even Howard Marks’ mixed verdict—acknowledging a solid business but questioning inflated expectations—mirrors the tension between its strengths and potential overvaluation, while the efficient-market camp’s skepticism implies the stock’s case for outperformance is thin. The debate thus hinges on whether its liquidity and growth justify risk or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 89
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 83
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 57
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 56
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 56
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 43
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 43
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 40
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 13
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
43.2%
Operating Margin
11.9%
Net Margin
7.5%
EBITDA Margin
18.0%
ROE
5.7%
ROA
4.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.51
Cash
$54.20M
Total Debt
$114.00M
Current Ratio
2.75
Debt/Equity
0.15
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$8.82
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 12 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Motley Fool · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
MarketBeat · 27.8.2026
StockStory · 16.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
MT Newswires · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Knowles Corporation (KN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 65/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KN currently scores 65/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
KN's technical score is 73/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 118.9%; Net income growth: 118.6%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: -12.1% over the last 3 months relative to the index; P/E: 74.5; %K 83.2 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for KN.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 22 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 35,723 | -175 | $39.28 |
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 35,898 | -6,443 | $39.27 |
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 35,723 | -175 | $39.28 |
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 35,898 | -6,443 | $39.27 |
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 6,443 | -6,443 | $39.27 |
| SHAVERS CHERYL L | Open Market Sale | 17.8.2026 | 175 | -175 | $39.28 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 6,951 | -6,951 | $38.00 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 14.8.2026 | 683,719 | -6,951 | $38.00 |
| Anderson John S. | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $38.84 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 43,049 | -43,049 | $38.69 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 690,670 | -43,049 | $38.69 |
| Anderson John S. | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 194,596 | -10,000 | $38.84 |
| Anderson John S. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $39.07 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 150,000 | -150,000 | $39.07 |
| Niew Jeffrey | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 733,719 | -150,000 | $39.07 |
| Anderson John S. | Open Market Sale | 12.8.2026 | 204,596 | -30,000 | $39.07 |
| Cabrera Raymond D. | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 6,178 | -6,178 | $36.28 |
| Cabrera Raymond D. | Open Market Sale | 27.7.2026 | 127,945 | -6,178 | $36.28 |
| Giesecke Daniel J. | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 10,012 | -10,012 | $37.31 |
| Giesecke Daniel J. | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 10,189 | -10,189 | $37.33 |
| Giesecke Daniel J. | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 185,867 | -10,189 | $37.33 |
| Giesecke Daniel J. | Open Market Sale | 27.5.2026 | 175,855 | -10,012 | $37.31 |
| Cabrera Raymond D. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.5.2026 | 17,599 | -17,599 | $36.62 |
| Cabrera Raymond D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.5.2026 | 25,210 | -25,210 | $16.77 |
| Cabrera Raymond D. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 13.5.2026 | 25,210 | +25,210 | $16.77 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
4,611,142 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 4,210,147 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
58.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology