Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$22.59
▼ $0.40 (-1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 04:06 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$15.15B
Day Range
$22.38 - $23.14
52-Week Range
$19.76 - $26.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
KIM is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+2.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/26 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 42.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $17.69 vs. price $22.59 (-21.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (60/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
83/100
Similarity
15
Historical Matches
91/100
Analog Quality
-1.7%
Median 40D Outcome
72/100
Pattern Consistency
🟢 Bullish
53%
+2.4% … +4.8%
🟡 Base
7%
-0.5% … -0.5%
🔴 Bearish
40%
-8.2% … -3.1%
Typical timeframe (based on real historical rates clearing a 60% bar): 10 trading days.
📌 Bottom line: Out of 15 similar historical cases for this stock, 53% (95% CI 30%–75%) saw the stock rise within 20 trading days, with a median gain of +1.4%.
Echo #1 — Momentum Breakout
7 occurrence(s) · 57% historical success
Historical outcome rate is not a probability — it's what happened in this specific historical sample, with a 95% confidence range.
| Horizon | Positive rate (95% CI) | Median | 25th–75th pct | Baseline median |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 5D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.1% | -0.1% … +3.2% | +0.1% |
| 10D | 60% (36%–80%) | +1.1% | -0.4% … +2.5% | +0.2% |
| 20D | 53% (30%–75%) | +1.4% | -3.5% … +3.1% | +0.5% |
| 40D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.7% | -5.9% … +4.3% | +1.2% |
| 60D | 40% (20%–64%) | -1.5% | -7.8% … +5.7% | +2.2% |
Sample size: 15 analogs, each at least 10 trading days apart (no double-counted overlapping events).
What happened after each historical match (20-day return)
| Date | Similarity | Regime | 20D outcome | 60D outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2025-10-10 | 83/100 | Downtrend | -1.2% | -2.3% |
| 2025-09-25 | 82/100 | Consolidation | +3.4% | -6.9% |
| 2017-10-26 | 81/100 | Downtrend | +2.6% | -10.9% |
| 2020-01-31 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -6.5% | -46.7% |
| 2025-03-10 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -10.1% | -1.5% |
| 2024-03-15 | 81/100 | Downtrend | -4.4% | -3.1% |
| 2024-04-04 | 81/100 | Downtrend | +1.9% | +3.6% |
| 2025-02-19 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -2.6% | -0.7% |
| 2025-12-08 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +2.7% | +17.7% |
| 2025-11-06 | 79/100 | Downtrend | -0.5% | +6.3% |
| 2025-08-01 | 79/100 | Downtrend | +8.4% | +7.9% |
| 2025-01-13 | 79/100 | ✓ Consolidation | +1.4% | -8.7% |
| 2024-12-16 | 78/100 | Consolidation | -8.8% | -15.1% |
| 2025-12-22 | 78/100 | Downtrend | +3.6% | +11.5% |
| 2026-05-15 | 78/100 | Consolidation | +10.2% | +5.1% |
Every accepted match is compared to today across 6 domains (price structure, momentum, technical, volatility, volume, relative strength) using z-scored feature distances — no single indicator dominates. Matches within 10 trading days of each other count as one event, not independent evidence. Outcome rates use a Wilson confidence interval (never a raw percentage alone), the mean return is winsorized against extreme outliers, and "Analog Quality" separately captures sample size, data completeness, and regime match — distinct from raw similarity. Relative strength is measured against SPY and against XLRE (this stock's sector).
Cross-stock analogs — real other companies, not this stock's own history.
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
60
Quality
58
Value
38
Momentum
10
Risk
50
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
56
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
SCANNING KIM...
Recent media coverage of Kimco Realty (KIM) has focused on its stock performance and investor sentiment amid broader market trends. Analysts debated its value, with some praising its dividends and financial stability while others recommended shorting its preferred stocks due to tight spreads and low yields. The company’s stock saw a slight decline post-earnings, prompting speculation about future price movements. JP Morgan maintained a neutral stance but raised its price target slightly, reflecting cautious optimism. Overall, KIM’s position in the REIT sector and macroeconomic factors like rising yields and inflation influenced discussions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kimco Realty. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
96
Fundamentals
56
Technical
10
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
64
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+23
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant anchoring behavior suggests traders are fixating on the stock’s proximity to support (0.4% above), potentially treating it as a near-term floor. Meanwhile, elevated overconfidence (+34% above DCF) and herding (relative underperformance) imply lingering optimism despite weak momentum. The narrative gap (27 points) hints at a disconnect between positive sentiment and technical weakness. The key question: will traders hold near support or pivot if the 0.4% threshold is breached?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:24 AM
What could change this?
📈 11D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Walter Bagehot — 34/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The scores range from a perfect 100 down to the mid‑30s, showing how the same stock can be viewed very differently under each historical framework. Based on Nelson’s documented cycle principles, the model estimates the stock is in a favorable oversold position, while Mackay, Fisher, Housel, and Smith—all scoring in the low‑60s—see modest upside but stop short of calling it exceptional. Marks (both cycle and general), Lynch, and the efficient‑market duo sit near the 50‑point mark, indicating mixed views that growth may already be priced in. Graham’s defensive criteria, Livermore’s trend rule, Bagehot’s liquidity concerns, and the enterprising‑Graham data‑gap all drive scores in the 30‑40 range, signaling caution. Consequently, investors who prioritize market cycles or momentum tend toward a positive outlook, whereas value‑oriented and risk‑averse methodologies remain skeptical.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 64
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 63
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 59
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 58
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 57
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 51
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 48
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 35
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 34
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 300 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
36.0%
Net Margin
27.3%
EBITDA Margin
65.3%
ROE
5.6%
ROA
3.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$211.65M
Total Debt
$7.72B
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.74
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.9.2026 | $0.280 |
| 5.6.2026 | $0.260 |
| 4.6.2026 | $0.260 |
| 6.3.2026 | $0.260 |
| 5.3.2026 | $0.260 |
| 5.12.2025 | $0.260 |
| 4.12.2025 | $0.260 |
| 5.9.2025 | $0.250 |
| 4.9.2025 | $0.250 |
| 6.6.2025 | $0.250 |
| 5.6.2025 | $0.250 |
| 7.3.2025 | $0.250 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$22.59
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$17.69
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-21.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
7.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 7.5% | $1.18B | $1.09B |
| 2 | 6.3% | $1.26B | $1.06B |
| 3 | 5.0% | $1.32B | $1.02B |
| 4 | 3.8% | $1.37B | $971.10M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $1.41B | $913.19M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.10B
Terminal Value
$22.16B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$14.40B
Enterprise Value
$19.45B
Net Debt
$7.51B
Equity Value
$11.94B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.39
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.57
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
ChartMill · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 22.8.2026
Yahoo · 21.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
Kimco Realty (KIM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KIM currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KIM's estimated fair value is $17.69, which is 21.7% below the current price of $22.59. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KIM's technical score is 10/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 42.3%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 1.6% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $17.69 vs. price $22.59 (-21.7%); Calmar: 0.27 (3y annualized return 7.3% / max drawdown 27.5%); Price is below the 50-day average.
Yes — KIM has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 2 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SALTZMAN RICHARD B | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| Jamieson David | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 31,770 | +31,770 | — |
| Moniz Henry | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| Richardson Valerie | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| Lashine Nancy | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| Preusse Mary Hogan | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| COHEN GLENN GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 31,770 | +31,770 | — |
| LOURENSO FRANK | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| COVIELLO PHILIP E JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 7,720 | +7,720 | — |
| Flynn Conor C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 285,880 | +285,880 | — |
| Cooper Ross | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 31,770 | +31,770 | — |
| COVIELLO PHILIP E JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 91,215 | +7,720 | — |
| LOURENSO FRANK | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 211,656 | +7,720 | — |
| COHEN GLENN GARY | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 689,813 | +31,770 | — |
| SALTZMAN RICHARD B | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 25,430 | +7,720 | — |
| Flynn Conor C | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 703,340 | +285,880 | — |
| Preusse Mary Hogan | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 25,430 | +7,720 | — |
| Jamieson David | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 61,650 | +31,770 | — |
| Cooper Ross | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 654,966 | +31,770 | — |
| Richardson Valerie | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 80,800 | +7,720 | — |
| Moniz Henry | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 50,690 | +7,720 | — |
| Lashine Nancy | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.2.2026 | 9,136 | +7,720 | — |
| LOURENSO FRANK | Open Market Sale | 17.2.2026 | 8,594 | -8,594 | $23.14 |
| LOURENSO FRANK | Open Market Sale | 17.2.2026 | 203,936 | -8,594 | $23.14 |
| COHEN GLENN GARY | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.2.2026 | 14,810 | -14,810 | $22.32 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
31,726,858 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 31,700,213 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 59.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology