Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Basic Materials · ·
$28.08
▼ $0.41 (-1.4%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:57 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$33.69B
Day Range
$27.88 - $28.79
52-Week Range
$22.01 - $39.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$22.29
Resistance
$33.48
KGC is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+26.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 20/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $54.29 vs. price $28.08 (+93.3%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.1% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
as of 09/11/202667
This Week
76
7D Ago
↓ -9
Weakening
Technical
33
7D Ago: 70
↓ -37
Fundamental
86
7D Ago: 86
→ 0
Growth
82
7D Ago: 82
→ 0
Valuation
67
7D Ago: 67
→ 0
News
100
7D Ago: 100
→ 0
Quality
63
7D Ago: 63
→ 0
Risk
54
7D Ago: 62
↓ -8
Biggest Declines
📊 Score History
67
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $31.59
Evidence: +4.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
15d ago · $31.59
Evidence: +8.0pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
15d ago · $31.59
Evidence: +4.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
15d ago · $31.59
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
15d ago · $31.59
Evidence: 7 bullish / 3 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
⚖️ Base Case
67 / 100
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
80
$33.48
Now
67
$28.08
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
No signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
63
Value
67
Momentum
33
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
86
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Kinross Gold Corporation has focused on its strong stock performance, with a notable 13% gain in a month and a 7x return over three years. Analysts highlight its valuation as mixed but potentially attractive if gold prices remain supportive, emphasizing its dividend and buyback programs alongside defensive appeal in precious metals. The company’s recent momentum—including a 31% monthly return—has drawn investor attention amid broader discussions on gold miners’ cash flow strength and shareholder returns.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Kinross Gold Corporation. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
43
Psychology
29
Fundamentals
86
Technical
33
Valuation
67
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+6%
Market Narrative
47
Fundamental Reality
43
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant herding behavior reflects traders aligning with KGC’s relative outperformance amid peer declines, despite weak momentum and extreme sentiment. Euphoria persists due to positive news (100/100) and technical support (above 200-day avg), though valuation remains detached from fundamentals. The narrow narrative-reality gap (4 points) suggests limited misalignment, but the disconnect between sentiment and price action raises caution. The key question: will traders sustain herding despite lagging fundamentals, or will sentiment-driven euphoria fade?
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:47 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Kinross Gold stock has returned 31.19% in the past month and 47.15% year-to-date (article 6)."
"Kinross Gold stock looks cheap even after a 7x run in 3 years (article 4)."
"Kinross Gold looks cheap if gold strength keeps supporting the story (article 6)."
"KGC's $4.4B liquidity and solid free cash flow boost growth projects (article 12)."
📈 20D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 96/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 14/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides methodologies sharply between those emphasizing long-term growth and quality—like Peter Lynch (96), Philip Fisher (95), and Edgar Lawrence Smith (94)—who see it as a high-potential ‘buy and hold’ candidate, likely undervalued relative to its future earnings. Meanwhile, value-focused or cycle-sensitive investors like Benjamin Graham (69/40), Samuel Armstrong Nelson (38), and Howard Marks (cycle, 49) are far more cautious, either because the stock doesn’t meet strict margin-of-safety criteria or appears stretched in its market positioning. Even liquidity-focused thinkers like Walter Bagehot (80) and Thorstein Veblen (80) lean positive, but only on structural strengths rather than valuation, while efficient-market skeptics (Malkiel/Bogle, 62) dismiss it as unproven. The divide highlights whether the stock’s appeal lies in its qualitative fundamentals (growth, management, or industry tailwinds) or its quantitative pricing—an irreconcilable tension for many frameworks.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 95
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 94
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 80
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 80
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 71
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 69
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 63
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 60
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 48
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 43
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 14
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
52.7%
Operating Margin
46.5%
Net Margin
35.0%
EBITDA Margin
62.2%
ROE
28.8%
ROA
19.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.96
Cash
$1.74B
Total Debt
$738.20M
Current Ratio
2.35
Debt/Equity
0.09
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 20.8.2026 | $0.040 |
| 21.5.2026 | $0.040 |
| 20.5.2026 | $0.040 |
| 11.3.2026 | $0.040 |
| 10.3.2026 | $0.040 |
| 21.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 20.8.2025 | $0.030 |
| 29.5.2025 | $0.030 |
| 28.5.2025 | $0.030 |
| 5.3.2025 | $0.030 |
| 4.3.2025 | $0.030 |
| 27.11.2024 | $0.030 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$28.08
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$54.29
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+93.3%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $3.21B | $2.94B |
| 2 | 19.4% | $3.83B | $3.22B |
| 3 | 13.8% | $4.36B | $3.36B |
| 4 | 8.1% | $4.71B | $3.34B |
| 5 | 2.5% | $4.83B | $3.14B |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$2.57B
Terminal Value
$76.13B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$49.48B
Enterprise Value
$65.48B
Net Debt
$-1.00B
Equity Value
$66.49B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$7.00
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$7.00
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Zacks · 10.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Zacks · 8.9.2026
ChartMill · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Kinross Gold Corporation (KGC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 67/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
KGC currently scores 67/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, KGC's estimated fair value is $54.29, which is 93.3% above the current price of $28.08. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
KGC's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $54.29 vs. price $28.08 (+93.3%); Revenue growth (last year): 36.9%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 153.2%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.1% of price; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — KGC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,227,261 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 17,794,548 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
38.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 30.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology