Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$66.24
▲ $0.04 (+0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/15 03:15 PM
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$65.39 - $66.28
52-Week Range
$40.97 - $68.45
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+26.4% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 8/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
ROC (rate of change)
ROC 12 days: -1.3%
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
IHAK’s overall score of 63 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile tempered by a robust news sentiment. The stock’s technical indicators present a contradictory picture: while it maintains an uptrend above the 200-day average and a positive CMF (0.12), it struggles with short-term weakness, evidenced by its position below the 50-day average, negative MACD momentum, and an RSI of 48.1. This suggests a stock that may be consolidating after a recent rally, with potential for recovery given its proximity to the lower Bollinger Band. Risk metrics are moderately concerning, with a Calmar ratio of 0.70 highlighting volatility relative to returns (16.6% annualized return vs. a 23.5% max drawdown), while the ATR of 2.8% indicates manageable but not negligible price swings. However, the news category stands out with a perfect score (100), driven by strong AI-related coverage, positioning IHAK as a beneficiary of broader digital transformation trends and institutional interest (e.g., JPMorgan’s AI-focused picks). The disconnect between technical fragility and positive external narratives underscores the need to monitor whether market sentiment can sustain the stock’s momentum amid short-term technical headwinds.
The stock shows mixed signals: it sits above the 200-day average and SAR point (indicating an uptrend), but below the 50-day average, with negative MACD momentum and an RSI of 48.1 (weak/negative bias). The %K at 37.2 suggests neutral momentum.
This duality—strong long-term trends but short-term weakness—could signal either a pullback or a consolidation phase before potential upside.
All five news items are overwhelmingly positive, emphasizing AI-driven growth, institutional endorsements (e.g., JPMorgan), and macroeconomic tailwinds for tech/consumer AI stocks.
Strong news sentiment could drive volume and sentiment, potentially offsetting technical volatility or even catalyzing a rebound.
The ATR (2.8%) is moderate, but the Calmar ratio (0.70) reveals a high drawdown-to-return tradeoff (23.5% max drawdown vs. 16.6% annualized return), indicating volatility risk.
Investors should weigh whether the stock’s volatility aligns with their risk tolerance, especially if relying on AI-driven growth for stability.
StockIQ conclusion
IHAK presents a nuanced profile with a moderate overall score (63), driven by a strong news narrative around AI but tempered by technical fragility and volatility risk. The stock’s position above key long-term averages suggests resilience, but short-term indicators like the negative MACD and RSI signal caution. Investors should monitor whether the positive external momentum can translate into sustained technical strength or if the stock remains trapped in a consolidation phase. The risk-reward balance hinges on whether AI-driven growth stories continue to attract capital and whether technical conditions improve to confirm the uptrend.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
79
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
77
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF** has centered on broader tech sector trends rather than the fund itself. Headlines highlight cautious optimism amid AI-driven growth, with tech stocks showing resilience despite volatility—including a brief rebound after a seven-day losing streak. Cybersecurity ETFs are noted for strong Q2 results from top holdings, while broader discussions emphasize AI’s economic impact, digital transformation, and selective investment strategies in AI-fueled tech. No direct mentions of the ETF’s performance or holdings appear.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
35
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
40
Fundamentals
—
Technical
77
Valuation
—
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+20%
Market Narrative
63
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for IHAK suggests a dominant narrative-reality disconnect, with euphoria (35) driven by extreme positive sentiment and outperformance despite weak momentum. This implies investors may be anchoring to recent gains (+20.7% above 200-day avg) while ignoring short-term weakness (-2.3% ROC). The elevated volume (1.21x avg) and neutral RSI (48) hint at cautious FOMO or panic selling, but the extreme sentiment (100/100) overshadows these signals. The key question: *Is the outperformance sustainable, or will reality (e.g., momentum reversal) force a narrative reset?*
Updated: 09/06/2026, 12:49 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"JPMorgan’s latest consumer-tech picks highlight AI and digital transformation winners"
"Cybersecurity ETFs to Buy as Top Holdings Deliver Robust Q2 Results"
"AI is becoming a visible source of macroeconomic resilience, especially in the US"
"While tech stocks have had a strong run... investors need to be more discerning"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 50/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 15/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among the methodologies, with only Samuel Armstrong Nelson offering a cautiously optimistic take—his model flags a potential oversold cycle position, suggesting a possible entry point for investors who follow his trend-following approach. Meanwhile, the majority of frameworks—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Veblen—hit roadblocks due to insufficient data, leaving their verdicts inconclusive. On the other end of the spectrum, the most bearish signals come from Livermore, Marks, and Schwager, who either see a negative trend, late-cycle risks, or no viable setup at all, reflecting their strict adherence to trend alignment, valuation discipline, and systematic trading principles. The contrast highlights how some methods rely on macro or cyclical cues (like Nelson’s) while others demand concrete fundamentals or trend confirmation, leaving this stock in a gray zone for most.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 44
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 41
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 29
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 15
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.007 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.037 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.003 |
| 17.12.2024 | $0.097 |
| 20.12.2023 | $0.047 |
| 7.6.2023 | $0.013 |
| 13.12.2022 | $0.025 |
| 9.6.2022 | $0.059 |
| 13.12.2021 | $0.213 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 5 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
MarketBeat · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 19.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 29.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for iShares Cybersecurity and Tech ETF (IHAK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for IHAK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
IHAK's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ROC 12 days: -1.3%; %K 82.4 — overbought; Volume is falling despite the price advance — possible weakening.
Yes — IHAK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
68,840 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 56,726 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
57.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology