Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Basic Materials · ·
$20.35
▲ $0.19 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/20 01:45 AM
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$12.03B
Day Range
$19.91 - $20.46
52-Week Range
$10.87 - $24.87
Beta
—
Next Earnings
02.11.2026
Support
$13.62
Resistance
$22.32
IAG is a stock from the Materials sector — Mining, chemicals, and metals — the raw materials that feed other industries, sensitive to commodity prices.
+84.8% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 7/12 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 2.36 (3y annualized return 102.1% / max drawdown 43.3%)
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.2% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
70
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
19d ago · $20.45
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
19d ago · $20.45
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
21d ago · $20.59
Evidence: -3.4pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
22d ago · $20.34
Evidence: -4.9pp vs. sector average today
What happened after
22d ago · $20.34
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
22d ago · $20.34
Evidence: 10 bullish / 1 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
24d ago · $21.72
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
24d ago · $21.72
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
25d ago · $22.17
Evidence: המניה במגמת עלייה ברורה ללא טווח מסחר מוגדר בטווח הזמן שנבדק.
What happened after
25d ago · $22.17
Evidence: 9 bullish / 2 bearish technical signals agreeing
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🕰️ StockIQ Time Machine
What did StockIQ know — and when? Pick a date from the real accumulated history.
As of August 26, 2026
Then
83
$22.17
Now
70
$20.35
What happened since
Signals detected by this date
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
67
Risk
50
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Iamgold Corporation** has focused on its financial performance and strategic shifts, particularly in wealth management and employee benefits. The company’s stock has shown strong growth—outperforming the market by **41.86% annually over five years**, with a **$1,000 investment in 2021 now worth over $5,000**. Additionally, Iamgold (listed as **iA Financial** on TSX) expanded its wealth management presence via the **RF Capital acquisition**, while broader market trends, like gold price volatility and Fed rate expectations, indirectly influenced mining stocks. The company also announced a **partnership with Science&Humans** to improve employee health benefits.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Iamgold Corporation. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
41
Fundamentals
—
Technical
67
Valuation
—
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+21%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+15
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
IAG’s psychology score (32) is driven by **euphoria**, likely reflecting a disconnect between recent negative momentum (-1.9% ROC) and the stock’s strong outperformance (+17.6% above 200-day average). The high narrative gap (9) suggests traders may be overestimating fundamentals or growth potential despite technical signals that appear neutral (RSI 56, moderate volume). Anchoring to resistance (11.0% below) hints at potential resistance to selling, but the lack of panic or herding signals keeps the environment calm. The key question: *Will traders sustain euphoria despite weak momentum, or will reality (e.g., earnings) disrupt the narrative?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:35 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gold has spent 2026 doing things it has never done before... Goldman Sachs Research now forecasts the metal will reach US$4,900 per troy ounce by the end of 2026"
"iA Financial has returned about 232.6%... Iamgold (NYSE:IAG) has outperformed the market over the past 5 years by 41.86% on an annualized basis"
"iA Financial (TSX:IAG) is acquiring RF Capital, adding to its wealth management capabilities and distribution network"
📈 14D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 53/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent scores reflect stark contrasts between methodologies that prioritize caution and those that lack definitive signals. On one end, **Jesse Livermore** and **Burton Malkiel/Bogle** lean toward neutrality—Livermore sees no clear trend, while the efficient-market camp dismisses the stock as unworthy of active picking. Meanwhile, **Howard Marks** and **Gerald Loeb** sound alarms, flagging excessive risk and valuation concerns that would deter even the most disciplined value investors. At the opposite extreme, **Thorstein Veblen** and **Morgan Housel** warn of speculative excess and volatility that could erode patience, while the **Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot** methodologies all default to indecision due to insufficient fundamental data. The middle ground—where **Jack Schwager** and **Howard Marks (Market Cycle)** see neutral or cyclical positioning—suggests the stock lacks the clarity needed for decisive action, leaving investors either ignoring it or treating it with extreme wariness.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 52
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 44
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 42
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 40
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 34
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 20
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 2 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
CNW Group · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
TMX Newsfile · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
CNW Group · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Iamgold Corporation (IAG) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for IAG specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
IAG's technical score is 67/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 2.36 (3y annualized return 102.1% / max drawdown 43.3%); Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.2% of price; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for IAG.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 8 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $32.80 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $32.79 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 6,000 | -6,000 | $32.91 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $32.90 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 36,000 | -15,000 | $32.90 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 30,000 | -6,000 | $32.91 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 25,000 | -5,000 | $32.79 |
| SMITH DAVID STEWART | Open Market Sale | 27.2.2026 | 20,000 | -5,000 | $32.80 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
7,439,944 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 5,899,334 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
40.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology