Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · CBOE
$22.96
▲ $1.33 (+6.1%)
Market data updated: 09/19 10:46 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$1.35B
Day Range
$22.08 - $23.03
52-Week Range
$16.40 - $35.76
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$17.47
Resistance
$23.14
-30.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/17 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 22.8% / max drawdown 53.2%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The stock **HODL** earns a **moderate overall score of 55**, reflecting a strong technical profile but significant fundamental and growth concerns. On the technical front, the stock demonstrates robust momentum with prices above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 69.2, indicating healthy upward momentum. However, the %K reading of 89.0 suggests overbought conditions, which could signal a near-term pullback. Fundamentally, the company’s performance is deeply concerning, with a **negative return on equity (-16.8%)** and return on assets (-14.0%), signaling inefficiency or losses in operations. Growth is equally problematic, with net income declining by **146.3%**, highlighting severe financial deterioration. Valuation lacks explicit data but appears neutral, while news sentiment leans negative due to broader crypto market uncertainty, including Bitcoin ETF and analyst commentary. Risk metrics are elevated, with a **Calmar ratio of 0.42** (indicating high volatility relative to returns) and a **53.2% max drawdown**, underscoring potential instability. The falling trading volume despite price gains further raises red flags about sustainability.
The stock exhibits strong bullish momentum with prices above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day), a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 69.2, but is overbought (%K 89.0).
Technical strength suggests short-term upside potential, but overbought conditions may limit further gains without confirmation.
The company shows severe financial inefficiency, with negative ROE (-16.8%) and ROA (-14.0%), indicating losses or poor asset utilization.
Negative profitability metrics raise doubts about long-term sustainability and operational health.
Net income has collapsed by **146.3%**, signaling a catastrophic decline in earnings power.
Such extreme negative growth is a major red flag for investors seeking expansion or stability.
No explicit valuation metrics are provided, leaving this category neutral based on available data.
Lack of valuation context makes it difficult to assess whether the stock is fairly priced or over/undervalued.
Recent news sentiment is predominantly negative, with Bitcoin ETF and analyst commentary highlighting market volatility and uncertainty.
Negative news may dampen investor confidence and contribute to higher volatility or risk.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR 2.7% of price) and a **Calmar ratio of 0.42**, with a **53.2% max drawdown** over three years.
Such risk metrics indicate potential for significant losses during downturns, requiring cautious positioning.
StockIQ conclusion
HODL’s **moderate score of 55** is driven by a strong technical setup but undermined by severe fundamental weaknesses and high risk. While short-term momentum and relative outperformance are encouraging, the company’s **negative profitability, extreme income decline, and volatility** create significant concerns. Investors should closely monitor news sentiment, volume trends, and any signs of financial recovery before considering exposure. The stock’s performance remains highly speculative, with risks outweighing near-term technical positives.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
52
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
44
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
77
Risk
42
Sentiment
32
Fundamental
42
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the **VanEck Bitcoin ETF** highlights its growing investor interest amid Bitcoin’s price recovery, with notable inflows—including a $730 million surge in September—driven by spot Bitcoin ETF demand and macro bullish signals. The hack of the Coldcard wallet has sparked debate about custody solutions, potentially boosting ETF adoption. Analysts also emphasize its low-cost structure (20 bps fee) and tax-efficient income options, though volatility and regulatory risks remain key considerations. Broader themes include Bitcoin’s market momentum and comparisons to alternative asset flows like AI and semiconductors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about VanEck Bitcoin ETF. News trend score: 32. Reason: 4 of the last 7 articles are negative, versus 1 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
42
Technical
77
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+29%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-7
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a **FOMO-driven chase**—momentum and volume align with speculative interest, though volatility hints at selective profit-booking. The narrative gap (-4) implies traders slightly overestimate fundamentals, but euphoria is muted by resistance proximity. Key open question: Will traders sustain momentum or pivot to profit-taking as volatility persists? Anchoring may cap upside if resistance holds, while volatility could signal a near-term pause in the rally.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 05:09 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bitcoin ETFs pull in $730.9M, their biggest day since January"
"VanEck Bitcoin ETF: 20 bps fee, $1.05B AUM, tight spreads"
"Bloomberg’s Eric Balchunas says [Coldcard hack] could drive more investors to spot Bitcoin ETFs"
"Bitcoin bull market signals align as ETF inflows surge"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and cautious camps, reflecting stark differences in their focus. Jesse Livermore’s high score (75) and positive verdict hinge on technical price action that aligns with his trend-following principles, while Charles Mackay’s moderate excitement (68) suggests early crowd-driven momentum. In contrast, the valuation- and fundamentals-driven models—like Graham (50), Fisher (50), and Lynch (50)—lack sufficient data to form a definitive opinion, leaving them neutral. Meanwhile, the more cyclical or risk-aware frameworks—such as Nelson (17) and Veblen (33)—warn of overvaluation or speculative excess, while the efficient-market camp (44) dismisses the stock as unexceptional. The divide underscores whether this stock’s appeal lies in its price movement (Livermore/Mackay) or whether its fundamentals or market positioning remain murky or overstretched.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 61
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 56
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 44
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 43
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 33
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 6
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-16.8%
ROA
-14.0%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
—
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 1 positive, 2 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 7 articles.
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.8.2026
VanEck Bitcoin ETF (HODL) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 52/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
HODL currently scores 52/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
HODL's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 64.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.43 (3y annualized return 22.8% / max drawdown 53.2%); Return on equity (ROE): -16.8% (negative); Net income growth: -146.3%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for HODL.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
95,734 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 267,701 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 25.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology