Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · OTC
$15.89
▲ $0.39 (+2.5%)
Market data updated: 09/18 12:36 PM
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$15.77 - $15.92
52-Week Range
$11.50 - $20.26
Beta
—
Next Earnings
12.11.2026
+12.7% (1Y)
🟡 Moderate
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
MACD
MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
43
Risk
50
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. (Foxconn) highlights its strong performance tied to AI-driven demand and seasonal ICT growth, with expectations for a robust third-quarter outlook. The company’s stock rose ahead of a 35% profit jump in Q2, while broader industry trends—such as Apple’s high-end foldable iPhone plans and AI-related investments—indirectly underscore Foxconn’s role in tech manufacturing. Headlines emphasize its resilience in supply chains and partnerships within the AI and electronics sectors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. GDR (Each Rep 2 Shs) (Reg S). News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 17 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
36
Fundamentals
—
Technical
43
Valuation
—
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-9%
Market Narrative
56
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+6
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior here suggests a mixed but cautious optimism, with FOMO and mild euphoria coexisting alongside residual loss aversion. The 12-period momentum (+4.6%) and elevated volume (1.12x) align with FOMO, but the 3-month decline (-8.4%) and proximity to resistance (6.8%) may temper aggressive buying. The key open question is whether the positive momentum will sustain or if loss aversion will trigger further caution. Narrative-reality divergence (gap: 7) hints at potential mispricing or misalignment in expectations.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 04:08 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Foxconn expects its third-quarter performance to exceed market expectations as robust demand for artificial intelligence-related products boost operations"
"Foxconn Stock Rises 2.7% Before Profit Jumps 35%"
"Foxconn's AI Business Just Overtook iPhones"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jack Schwager — 22/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some investors detecting cautious optimism while others flag clear red flags. Charles Mackay’s high score suggests early signs of speculative crowd behavior, hinting at potential overheating, while Howard Marks and Jesse Livermore both see mixed signals—acknowledging a solid business but questioning whether the market has already priced in its potential. Meanwhile, the majority of methodologies—including Graham, Fisher, Lynch, and Bagehot—lack sufficient data to form a definitive verdict, reflecting a lack of clarity on fundamentals or valuation. On the other end, Samuel Nelson and Jack Schwager issue stark warnings, with Nelson calling the cycle overbought and Schwager dismissing it outright as lacking a disciplined setup, contrasting sharply with the more measured caution of Morgan Housel, who sees it as holdable but not effortless.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 69
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 52
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 47
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 47
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 38
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 22
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 269 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.455 |
| 2.7.2025 | $0.387 |
| 2.7.2024 | $0.328 |
| 3.7.2023 | $0.345 |
| 13.7.2022 | $0.349 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 12 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 17 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
GuruFocus.com · 19.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 19.8.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Quartz · 14.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 13.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.8.2026
The Wall Street Journal · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
Benzinga Private Markets · 4.8.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Hon Hai Precision Industry Co., Ltd. GDR (Each Rep 2 Shs) (Reg S) (HNHPF) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for HNHPF specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
HNHPF's technical score is 43/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 50.9 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -10.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — HNHPF has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
650,912 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 603,880 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
5.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 17.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology