Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$119.46
▼ $1.13 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:04 AM
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$118.43 - $121.36
52-Week Range
$69.66 - $121.97
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+39.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 10/14 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟢 Bullish
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Stochastic
%K 86.2 — overbought
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
HACK’s overall investor score of 69 reflects a mixed technical and risk profile, tempered by a strong positive news sentiment. The technical category scores 60, where the stock demonstrates resilience with its price holding above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, signaling a sustained uptrend supported by the SAR indicator. However, this strength is undermined by weakening momentum—evidenced by a negative MACD histogram, a 12-day ROC of -1.4%, and an RSI of 48.0, all of which suggest a loss of upward momentum and potential overbought conditions. The risk category scores 50, highlighting volatility and drawdown risk, with a Calmar ratio of 1.26 indicating a moderate risk-adjusted return profile, though the 21.9% max drawdown over three years suggests sensitivity to market corrections. Meanwhile, the news category scores 100, driven by a surge of positive sentiment, including analyst buy recommendations, AI infrastructure partnerships, and broader sector tailwinds, which could offset technical concerns in the near term.
The stock holds above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day) and maintains an uptrend via SAR, but momentum indicators (MACD, ROC, RSI) signal weakening upward momentum and potential overbought conditions.
This duality—strength in trend but weakening momentum—creates a mixed technical outlook that could lead to volatility or consolidation.
The news sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple buy recommendations, AI-related partnerships, and sector bullishness outweighing any negative headlines.
Positive news can drive short-term price appreciation and reduce perceived risk, potentially offsetting technical weaknesses.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR: 3.2%) and a significant historical drawdown (21.9%), though the Calmar ratio (1.26) suggests a balanced risk-reward profile.
High drawdowns indicate potential for sharp corrections, which could impact investor confidence or trigger profit-taking.
StockIQ conclusion
HACK presents a nuanced profile with resilient technical support (above key moving averages) but weakening momentum indicators, balanced by overwhelmingly positive news sentiment. The risk profile remains moderate, with historical volatility and drawdowns serving as cautionary flags. While the stock’s position in the lower Bollinger Bands and positive external factors could signal potential upside, the mixed technical signals and inherent volatility necessitate cautious observation. Investors should monitor momentum trends and news catalysts closely to assess whether the current equilibrium holds or shifts.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
86
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
88
Risk
50
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the **Amplify Cybersecurity ETF** (and related cybersecurity stocks) highlights shifting market dynamics in the AI-driven tech sector. Headlines emphasize strong earnings from major cybersecurity firms like **CrowdStrike** and **Palo Alto Networks**, driving demand for cybersecurity ETFs amid rising AI threats. Analysts note a pivot from hardware (chips) to software, with ETFs like **CIBR** outperforming peers due to resilience and risk-adjusted returns. However, some stocks—including **Cisco**—face volatility as investors weigh AI growth against broader tech market weakness. The focus remains on cybersecurity’s growing role in AI security and ETF performance amid sector transitions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Amplify Cybersecurity ETF. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
42
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
—
Technical
88
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+24%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+18
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for HACK suggests a disconnect between extreme positive sentiment (100/100) and weak momentum (-1.4% ROC), consistent with detached euphoria rather than active FOMO or panic. The 23.9% outperformance above the 200-day average, despite neutral RSI, implies investors may be ignoring recent weakness, possibly due to anchoring near resistance. The narrative gap (63 vs. 50) further suggests optimism exceeds fundamental justification. The key question: will this detachment persist, or will negative momentum trigger a re-evaluation?
Updated: 09/06/2026, 12:49 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
""CrowdStrike reports a blowout quarter, putting cybersecurity ETFs in the spotlight as AI agents create new demand for security tools""
""AI trade shifts from chips to software: learn why IGV/XSW are leading and see top picks like CrowdStrike, Datadog, PANW & ServiceNow""
""First Trust NASDAQ Cybersecurity ETF has outperformed peers in 6 of 8 years, demonstrating resilience and superior risk-adjusted returns""
""Palo Alto Networks has a history of beating analyst estimates... but the stock doesn’t always pop after financial results""
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jesse Livermore — 59/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among the methodologies, with only two approaches showing even moderate enthusiasm. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s cyclical analysis suggests a favorable position near an oversold threshold, implying potential for a rebound based on market timing principles. Meanwhile, Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology model flags early signs of speculative excitement, hinting at a possible bubble forming—but not yet at a peak. On the opposite end, the majority of investors either lack sufficient data to form a clear opinion (like Graham, Fisher, or Lynch) or outright dismiss the stock as risky or mispriced, with Howard Marks and Jack Schwager warning of valuation and volatility risks. The stark contrast between Nelson’s cautious optimism and the overwhelming caution from Marks, Livermore, or Schwager highlights whether this stock is a cyclical bargain or a speculative trap, depending on whether one leans into technical momentum or fundamental skepticism.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 59
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🔴 35
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 32
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 31
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 28
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 10
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 275 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (10 bullish · 1 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.12.2025 | $0.060 |
| 30.12.2024 | $0.054 |
| 27.9.2024 | $0.023 |
| 27.6.2024 | $0.026 |
| 26.3.2024 | $0.001 |
| 27.12.2023 | $0.084 |
| 20.9.2023 | $0.010 |
| 21.6.2023 | $0.030 |
| 28.12.2022 | $0.059 |
| 22.6.2022 | $0.020 |
| 23.3.2022 | $0.025 |
| 28.12.2021 | $0.017 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 2 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
MarketBeat · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
ACCESS Newswire · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Amplify Cybersecurity ETF (HACK) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for HACK specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
HACK's technical score is 88/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: %K 86.2 — overbought.
Yes — HACK has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
304,413 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 130,468 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 44.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology