Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$2.98
▲ $0.05 (+1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/26 09:23 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$31.24M
Day Range
$2.93 - $3.00
52-Week Range
$2.23 - $3.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
11.11.2026
Support
$2.81
Resistance
$3.39
+12.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/27 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 32.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $0.83 vs. price $2.98 (-72.2%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
82
Quality
58
Value
48
Momentum
34
Risk
48
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
53
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about U.S. Global Investors, Inc.. News trend score: 92. Reason: 8 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
30
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
45
Fundamentals
53
Technical
34
Valuation
48
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-5%
Market Narrative
78
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Howard Marks — 32/100
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 96
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 92
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 91
Exceptional company quality by Fisher's standards
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 77
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 76
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 66
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 56
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 52
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 46
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 32
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$2.81
Range Bottom
$3.39
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
25.0%
Operating Margin
-4.2%
Net Margin
21.2%
EBITDA Margin
-4.1%
ROE
6.8%
ROA
6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.24
Cash
$24.33M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
19.71
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 14.9.2026 | $0.008 |
| 17.8.2026 | $0.008 |
| 13.7.2026 | $0.008 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.008 |
| 11.5.2026 | $0.008 |
| 13.4.2026 | $0.008 |
| 16.3.2026 | $0.008 |
| 9.2.2026 | $0.008 |
| 12.1.2026 | $0.008 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.008 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.008 |
| 14.10.2025 | $0.008 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$2.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$0.83
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-72.2%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
1.5%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1.5% | $691.94K | $634.81K |
| 2 | 1.7% | $703.83K | $592.40K |
| 3 | 2.0% | $717.76K | $554.24K |
| 4 | 2.2% | $733.83K | $519.86K |
| 5 | 2.5% | $752.17K | $488.86K |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$682.00K
Terminal Value
$11.86M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$7.71M
Enterprise Value
$10.50M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$10.50M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.56
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$3.56
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 6 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 15 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 15.9.2026
Zacks · 8.7.2026
Proactive · 19.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 18.6.2026
Proactive · 16.6.2026
Proactive · 12.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 5.6.2026
Proactive · 2.6.2026
GlobeNewswire · 1.6.2026
GuruFocus.com · 21.5.2026
Proactive · 16.5.2026
U.S. Global Investors, Inc. (GROW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GROW currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GROW's estimated fair value is $0.83, which is 72.2% below the current price of $2.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GROW's technical score is 34/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 32.8%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 900.0%; Free cash flow growth: 182.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $0.83 vs. price $2.98 (-72.2%); Operating margin: -4.2% (negative); Calmar: 0.04 (3y annualized return 1.3% / max drawdown 32.8%).
Yes — GROW has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 17 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HOLMES FRANK E | Other Transaction | 31.8.2026 | 303,352 | +729 | $3.27 |
| Callicotte Lisa | Other Transaction | 31.8.2026 | 39,208 | +289 | $3.27 |
| HOLMES FRANK E | Other Transaction | 31.7.2026 | 302,623 | +835 | $2.86 |
| Callicotte Lisa | Other Transaction | 31.7.2026 | 38,919 | +331 | $2.86 |
| HOLMES FRANK E | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 301,788 | +764 | $3.12 |
| Callicotte Lisa | Other Transaction | 30.6.2026 | 38,588 | +303 | $3.12 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 3.6.2026 | 1,121,593 | +330 | $2.60 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 3.6.2026 | 1,121,593 | +330 | $2.60 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 1,121,263 | +20,496 | $2.59 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 2.6.2026 | 1,121,263 | +20,496 | $2.59 |
| HOLMES FRANK E | Other Transaction | 29.5.2026 | 301,024 | +904 | $2.64 |
| Callicotte Lisa | Other Transaction | 29.5.2026 | 38,285 | +359 | $2.64 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2026 | 1,100,767 | +1,376 | $2.60 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 28.5.2026 | 1,100,767 | +1,376 | $2.60 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,099,391 | +23,910 | $2.55 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 21.5.2026 | 1,099,391 | +23,910 | $2.55 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 1,075,481 | +3,601 | $2.55 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 13.5.2026 | 1,075,481 | +3,601 | $2.55 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 1,071,880 | +404 | $2.55 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 12.5.2026 | 1,071,880 | +404 | $2.55 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 11.5.2026 | 1,071,476 | +5,354 | $2.62 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 11.5.2026 | 1,071,476 | +5,354 | $2.62 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 8.5.2026 | 1,066,122 | +208 | $2.62 |
| Pilecki Derek Steven | Open Market Purchase | 8.5.2026 | 1,066,122 | +208 | $2.62 |
| Gator Capital Management, LLC | Open Market Purchase | 7.5.2026 | 1,065,914 | +2,976 | $2.62 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
10,996 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 9,185 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
21.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology