Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$14.92
▼ $0.09 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/26 09:23 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$1.05B
Day Range
$14.62 - $15.10
52-Week Range
$8.65 - $19.65
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$13.43
Resistance
$19.65
GPRE is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+62.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 11/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 158.9%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $11.70 vs. price $14.92 (-21.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
46
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
52
Risk
46
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
31
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Green Plains, Inc. has centered on its ethanol sector performance, with a focus on strong earnings and tax credit benefits—particularly the surge in earnings per share (EPS) and the impact of Section 45Z tax credits alongside EPA mandates, which have boosted ethanol margins. Analysts also compared Green Plains to competitors like Alto Ingredients, highlighting its market positioning amid fluctuating alcohol premiums and maintenance costs. Additionally, the company celebrated its 20th anniversary as a public entity, marking a milestone in its corporate history. Stock volatility and mixed analyst ratings were also noted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Green Plains, Inc.. News trend score: 68. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 7 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
25
Fundamentals
31
Technical
52
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-1%
Market Narrative
53
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GPRE’s psychology profile suggests a narrative-driven disconnect—buyers appear overconfident in growth potential despite weak fundamentals (flat revenue, stagnant margins) and a 32% premium to DCF. The dominant Confirmation Bias (score: 31) aligns with investors cherry-picking positive narratives while ignoring reality, while Overconfidence (29) reflects the premium valuation. Herding (6) and FOMO (16) are secondary, likely fueled by relative outperformance today. The key question: *Will traders pivot when fundamentals fail to justify the narrative gap?*
Updated: 09/04/2026, 11:07 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Green Plains is stock rated Buy as ethanol margins surge on Section 45Z tax credits"
"Green Plains is stock rated Buy as the market turns more bullish"
"Green Plains to Ring Nasdaq Opening Bell Celebrating 20 Years as a Public Company"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 79/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with scores ranging from a disciplined 68 (Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* bar) down to a resounding 30 (Lynch and Veblen’s red flags). The top-tier signals—like Schwager’s structured setup or Mackay’s crowd-driven caution—suggest a stock with *some* technical or speculative appeal, while the lower scores (Livermore’s trend opposition or Lynch’s growth failure) paint it as either overbought or fundamentally misaligned with aggressive growth strategies. Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* and Bagehot’s liquidity concerns moderate the excitement, implying it’s a *possible* play for patient, value-oriented investors—but not a slam-dunk. Meanwhile, the efficient-market camp and Fisher’s quality bar dismiss it outright, framing it as either unexceptional or overpriced for its fundamentals.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 79
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 70
Deep statistical discount — a real Enterprising Investor candidate
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 66
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 56
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 54
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 50
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 49
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 48
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 44
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 43
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 36
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 285 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
6.5%
Operating Margin
-3.2%
Net Margin
-5.8%
EBITDA Margin
1.5%
ROE
-15.8%
ROA
-7.7%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.80
Cash
$182.32M
Total Debt
$365.92M
Current Ratio
1.79
Debt/Equity
0.48
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$14.92
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$11.70
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-21.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $69.98M | $64.20M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $67.79M | $57.06M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $66.95M | $51.70M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $67.37M | $47.72M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $69.05M | $44.88M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$73.67M
Terminal Value
$1.09B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$707.69M
Enterprise Value
$973.25M
Net Debt
$183.60M
Equity Value
$789.65M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.35
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.20
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 3 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 25.9.2026
Yahoo · 23.9.2026
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 5.9.2026
Simply Wall St. · 5.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Exec Edge · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
Zacks · 26.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
StockStory · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Green Plains, Inc. (GPRE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 46/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GPRE currently scores 46/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, GPRE's estimated fair value is $11.70, which is 21.6% below the current price of $14.92. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
GPRE's technical score is 52/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 158.9%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: 0.48.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $11.70 vs. price $14.92 (-21.6%); Operating margin: -3.2% (negative); Net margin: -5.8% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GPRE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Collins Trent Lee | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.8.2026 | 44,496 | -2,261 | $16.03 |
| Osowski Chris | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.8.2026 | 226,401 | -11,989 | $16.03 |
| Osowski Chris | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.8.2026 | 11,989 | -11,989 | $16.03 |
| Collins Trent Lee | Tax Withholding in Shares | 19.8.2026 | 2,261 | -2,261 | $16.03 |
| Peterson Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Sweeney Patrick Francis | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| GRASSI CARL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Wagner Kimberly | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Anderson James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Aslam Farha | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Furcich Steven J | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Salinas Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 9,019 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Sweeney Patrick Francis | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 15,402 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Peterson Brian | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 80,339 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Salinas Martin | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 69,020 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Anderson James D | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 132,150 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Aslam Farha | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 54,190 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| GRASSI CARL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 45,355 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Wagner Kimberly | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 61,131 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Furcich Steven J | Grant/Award from Employer | 5.6.2026 | 45,355 | +9,019 | $14.97 |
| Havasi Imre | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 461 | -461 | $17.14 |
| Havasi Imre | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.5.2026 | 71,000 | -461 | $17.14 |
| Collins Trent Lee | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 657 | -657 | $17.25 |
| Collins Trent Lee | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.4.2026 | 46,757 | -657 | $17.25 |
| Havasi Imre | Tax Withholding in Shares | 13.3.2026 | 1,076 | -1,076 | $15.81 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
11,921,238 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 13,328,194 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
45.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 61.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology