Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$85.95
▲ $1.42 (+1.7%)
Market data updated: 09/17 10:47 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$29.58B
Day Range
$85.89 - $86.60
52-Week Range
$71.81 - $109.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+19.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/17 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 200
Price is below the 200-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
GLDM’s investor score of 58 reflects a mixed but cautiously optimistic profile, where strong growth metrics and positive technical momentum are partially offset by structural technical weaknesses and a volatile risk profile. The stock’s growth category stands out with an impressive 65.0% EPS growth and 119.1% net income growth, signaling robust underlying performance that could attract investors seeking high-growth opportunities. However, technical indicators reveal conflicting signals: while the price remains above the 50-day average and RSI (52.4) suggests positive momentum, the MACD histogram’s negativity and the price’s position below the 200-day average indicate a broader downtrend. Valuation appears favorable with a low P/E of 3.5, but this must be weighed against the stock’s high volatility (ATR: 1.9%) and a Calmar ratio of 1.22, which highlights significant drawdown risk. News sentiment is split, with positive coverage on gold’s stability and energy price dynamics counterbalanced by concerns about geopolitical risks and de-dollarization trends, adding ambiguity to the narrative. Overall, the stock’s strengths in growth and valuation are tempered by technical and risk-related headwinds, resulting in a moderate rating that leans toward cautious optimism for investors willing to tolerate volatility.
The stock shows mixed technical signals, with positive momentum (RSI 52.4, above 50-day average) but clear downtrend indicators (below 200-day average, negative MACD histogram, and price below SAR).
Technical alignment is critical for short-term trading decisions and investor confidence in trend continuation.
The stock exhibits strong profitability with a return on assets (ROA) of 25.5%, but no additional metrics like debt or margin trends are provided to assess broader financial health.
ROA strength suggests operational efficiency, but deeper fundamental analysis is needed to confirm sustainability.
GLDM demonstrates exceptional growth, with EPS up 65.0% and net income surging 119.1%, indicating accelerating profitability.
High growth rates are typically attractive for investors seeking capital appreciation, especially in cyclical or high-beta sectors.
The stock trades at a low P/E ratio of 3.5, suggesting it may be undervalued relative to peers or its growth potential.
A low P/E can signal potential upside, but it may also reflect market skepticism or risk premiums.
News sentiment is polarized, with positive coverage on gold’s stability and energy dynamics alongside negative commentary on geopolitical risks and macroeconomic uncertainty.
Sentiment shifts can drive volatility and investor perception, particularly in commodities tied to macroeconomic trends.
The stock exhibits high volatility (ATR: 1.9%) and a Calmar ratio of 1.22, indicating a 32.0% annualized return but with a 26.3% max drawdown, reflecting significant risk.
High volatility and drawdowns can erode portfolio stability, particularly for risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
GLDM presents a nuanced profile with compelling growth metrics and valuation appeal, but its technical and risk characteristics create a cautious outlook. The stock’s high earnings growth and low P/E ratio highlight potential for investors focused on capital appreciation, while its volatility and mixed technical signals require careful risk management. News sentiment underscores both opportunities and risks tied to gold’s role as a hedge, making GLDM a moderate play best suited for those comfortable with commodity-specific volatility and macroeconomic exposure.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
46
Risk
58
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
54
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on **SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust** (and gold-related ETFs like GLD) has centered on gold’s strong market performance, driven by geopolitical tensions, central bank accumulation, and concerns over de-dollarization. Headlines highlight gold’s 10% rally amid rising energy prices, Middle East instability, and central banks increasing their gold reserves—with the Dutch central bank relocating 86 tonnes of gold. Analysts emphasize gold’s appeal as a hedge against inflation and currency risks, despite short-term challenges like higher bond yields and a stronger dollar. The broader narrative frames gold as part of a potential "supercycle," with silver also gaining attention.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust. News trend score: 80. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
13
Fundamentals
54
Technical
46
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GLDM’s psychology score (10) reflects a neutral-to-moderate bias, with no single dominant state. FOMO (8) is the highest, yet weak momentum (-1.7% ROC) and neutral volume (0.97x) temper its intensity. Euphoria’s score (10) is misleading—price underperforms fundamentals (-1.7% vs. +0.6% EPS growth), and the 200-day average gap (-2.0%) suggests caution. The narrative gap (2) is minimal, implying no stark disconnect between market perception and reality. The key question: *Is the sentiment (74/100) masking underlying weakness?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:58 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Central banks continued their gold accumulation in July with net buying reported at 23t"
"Gold breaks away from real yield rules as central banks dump Treasuries for bullion"
"Gold's rally just sent a major signal"
"Gold outlook: Central bank buying and ETF inflows keep gold attractive"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for **GLDM** reflects deep methodological contrasts between value, growth, and cyclical investors. **Peter Lynch** and **Benjamin Graham** (both scoring 100) see it as a high-potential bet—Lynch highlights growth undervaluation, while Graham’s lack of data suggests it fails his strict quantitative filters. Meanwhile, **technical/cyclical approaches** like **Samuel Nelson** (69) and **Howard Marks (Market Cycle)** (49) lean cautiously, noting it’s either oversold or mid-cycle, avoiding extremes. **Jesse Livermore** (32) and **Jack Schwager** (19) outright reject it, aligning with trend-following and systematic discipline, while **efficient-market theorists** (42) dismiss it as unexceptional. The divide underscores whether the stock’s appeal lies in *growth potential* (Lynch) or *structural risks* (Livermore/Schwager), with no clear consensus beyond speculative or contrarian camps.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 78
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 73
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 59
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 18
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
25.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$25.06
Cash
$0
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 8.9.2026
SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GLDM currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GLDM's technical score is 46/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 65.0%; Net income growth: 119.1%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GLDM.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,243,340 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,098,481 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology