Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$402.01
▲ $3.65 (+0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/18 05:01 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/18/2026
Market Cap
$141.67B
Day Range
$398.14 - $402.06
52-Week Range
$336.31 - $509.70
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+15.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/18 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
GLD’s overall investor score of 57 reflects a mixed but cautiously optimistic outlook, where growth metrics and recent news sentiment provide some strength, though technical and valuation factors introduce notable caution. The stock’s **growth category** stands out with a score of 66, driven by exceptional EPS growth (61.0%) and net income growth (74.6%), signaling robust underlying profitability. However, **technical indicators** (score: 51) reveal conflicting signals—while the RSI (52.4) suggests positive momentum and the price remains above the 50-day average, the MACD histogram’s negativity and the price’s position below the 200-day average and SAR point indicate persistent downside pressure. **News sentiment** (score: 68) is the highest-scoring category, reflecting a balanced mix of speculative narratives (e.g., de-dollarization trends) and macroeconomic tailwinds (e.g., inflation data expectations), though some headlines carry negative undertones. **Fundamental strength** (score: 54) is anchored by a healthy ROA (28.5%), but valuation (score: 55) remains modest with a low P/E (3.7), which could attract value investors despite the mixed technical backdrop. **Risk metrics** (score: 58) highlight moderate volatility (ATR 2.0%) and a historically high Calmar ratio (1.20), suggesting resilience in drawdowns but also potential for sharp corrections. Overall, the stock’s performance hinges on whether its growth momentum can overcome technical headwinds and whether macroeconomic narratives continue to favor gold as a hedge asset.
The stock shows mixed technical signals: positive momentum (RSI 52.4, above 50-day average) but negative MACD and a downtrend (below 200-day average and SAR).
This duality suggests short-term optimism may clash with longer-term bearish trends, complicating trading decisions.
Strong return on assets (28.5%) indicates efficient asset utilization, though no other fundamentals are highlighted beyond this.
High ROA is a positive signal for profitability, but broader financial health metrics (e.g., debt, margins) are absent.
Earnings and net income growth are exceptionally high (61.0% and 74.6%, respectively), signaling rapid profitability expansion.
Such growth is typically a strong indicator of long-term investor confidence and potential upside.
The P/E ratio is low (3.7), suggesting the stock may be undervalued relative to earnings, but no comparative benchmarks are provided.
A low P/E can attract value investors, but context (e.g., sector norms) is needed to assess true attractiveness.
News sentiment is positive (68), with mixed headlines—some bullish (e.g., inflation data) and others bearish (e.g., geopolitical risks).
Sentiment volatility can drive short-term price swings, especially in speculative assets like gold.
Moderate volatility (ATR 2.0%) and a Calmar ratio of 1.20 indicate resilience to drawdowns but potential for sharp corrections.
Investors should weigh the risk-reward balance, especially if seeking stability or hedging strategies.
StockIQ conclusion
GLD presents a nuanced profile with compelling growth metrics and positive news sentiment offset by technical headwinds and valuation nuances. The stock’s strength lies in its rapid profitability expansion and low valuation, which could appeal to investors seeking stability or hedging opportunities. However, conflicting technical signals and macroeconomic uncertainties introduce caution, particularly for short-term traders. Without deeper fundamental insights or predictive geopolitical data, the stock’s trajectory remains dependent on whether its growth momentum can overcome structural challenges in the market.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
53
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
No data available
Value
55
Momentum
24
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
54
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **SPDR Gold Shares (GLD)** has centered on gold’s market performance and strategic investment appeal amid broader economic uncertainty. Headlines highlight gold’s sharp 10% rally after a mid-year correction, driven by themes like de-dollarization, geopolitical risks, and inflation concerns. Analysts emphasize GLD as a stable hedge, particularly as markets near all-time highs and election cycles loom. While billionaire investor Dan Loeb’s recent gold trades were noted, the focus remains on gold’s role as a safe-haven asset in volatile conditions.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about SPDR Gold Shares. News trend score: 100. Reason: 13 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
19
Fundamentals
54
Technical
24
Valuation
55
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+1%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GLD’s psychology scores reflect a neutral-to-cautious market stance, with no dominant bias. FOMO and panic selling scores are modest, consistent with weak momentum (-1.7% ROC) and neutral RSI (52). Euphoria is paradoxically high despite negative 200-day deviation (-2.1%), possibly reflecting misplaced optimism. The key open question is whether sentiment (68/100) or volatility (1.08x ATR) will escalate or stabilize, given the narrow narrative-reality gap (-1).
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:58 AM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Gold just rallied by over 10% after falling into correction territory earlier this year. Read on to know why you should continue investing in the yellow metal."
"The Best Gold ETF Is SPDR Gold Shares (GLD): Here's Why I'm Holding It in 2026"
"Investors also poured money into Treasury and gold ETFs; total ETF flows reached $5.3B on Thursday."
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for GLD reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate assets. Benjamin Graham and his Enterprising Investor variant both flag insufficient data, highlighting their strict reliance on traditional balance-sheet metrics that may not apply to ETFs like GLD. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s high score suggests he sees untapped growth potential, assuming the price hasn’t yet reflected the asset’s fundamentals—a view that contrasts sharply with Jesse Livermore’s low score, who dismisses it outright as counter-trend. Technical and cycle-based investors like Samuel Nelson and Howard Marks (Market Cycle) offer more nuanced middle-ground assessments, while efficient-market theorists and Schwager’s disciplined wizards outright reject the stock as unworthy of active selection.
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 89
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 76
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 67
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 29
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 12
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
28.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$111.13
Cash
$0
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 13 positive, 4 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SPDR Gold Shares (GLD) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 53/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GLD currently scores 53/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GLD's technical score is 24/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 61.0%; Net income growth: 74.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GLD.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
15,934,492 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 12,134,907 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology