Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$25.00
▲ $0.05 (+0.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 03:29 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$347.24M
Day Range
$25.00 - $25.00
52-Week Range
$24.70 - $26.53
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$24.94
Resistance
$25.41
-0.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/19 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.3% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.05 (3y annualized return 0.2% / max drawdown 4.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
38
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $25.00
Evidence: Panic-selling score jumped from 0 to 30 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
19
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
42
Institutional
8
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Great Elm Capital Corp. (GECC) has primarily centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings call and accompanying presentation**, held on August 6, 2026. The focus appears to be on financial performance, leadership updates (including remarks from CEO & Chairman Jason Reese), and strategic commentary related to the company’s 8.125% Notes Due 2029. No additional notable events or controversies were highlighted in the available sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Great Elm Capital Corp. - 8.125% Notes Due 2029. News trend score: 50. Reason: The mix of positive and negative articles is balanced — 0 vs. 0 out of the last 2 articles.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
95
Fundamentals
42
Technical
19
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
43
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-7
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for GECCH is overwhelmingly anchored to a resistance level (0.4% away), indicating traders are fixating on this psychological barrier. Overconfidence is present but secondary, as price momentum slightly exceeds fundamental weakness, suggesting selective optimism. The narrative gap (-5) hints at a minor disconnect between market perception and reality, but no dominant bias beyond anchoring is evident. The key question remains whether traders will break resistance or adjust expectations if price tests it. The absence of FOMO or panic suggests no extreme crowd behavior is driving the trade.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 09:44 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"CEO emphasized 'operational discipline' and 'cost optimization' as key drivers of Q2 profitability"
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect deep methodological contrasts between patient, qualitative investors and those reliant on quantitative or cyclical signals. Morgan Housel’s near-perfect score highlights a quiet, long-term compounder’s ideal—steady fundamentals and no crowd-driven hype—while Charles Mackay and Howard Marks (non-cycle) also see it as low-risk, though Marks’ slightly lower score suggests a cautious nod to potential hidden risks. In contrast, cyclical thinkers like Nelson and Livermore flag overbought conditions or trend reversals, while Fisher, Graham, and Lynch’s near-zero scores stem from a lack of actionable data for their growth/valuation frameworks. Even Bagehot and Schwager’s low scores underscore a mismatch between this stock’s profile and their balance-sheet or trend-following disciplines, leaving only Veblen’s critique—growth for its own sake—as a consistent, if negative, thematic warning.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 97
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 94
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 71
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 70
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 13
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$24.94
Range Bottom
$25.41
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-28.1%
ROA
-9.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$2.57
Cash
$1.83M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.9.2026 | $0.508 |
| 15.6.2026 | $0.502 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.508 |
| 15.12.2025 | $0.513 |
| 15.9.2025 | $0.508 |
| 13.6.2025 | $0.502 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.508 |
| 13.12.2024 | $0.576 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$9.14
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$9.14
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 2 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 2 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Great Elm Capital Corp. - 8.125% Notes Due 2029 (GECCH) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 38/100, rated "Weak" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GECCH currently scores 38/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GECCH's technical score is 19/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.3% of price; CMF 20 days: 0.38.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.05 (3y annualized return 0.2% / max drawdown 4.0%); Return on equity (ROE): -28.1% (negative); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -813.9%.
Yes — GECCH has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 12 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Other Transaction | 29.6.2026 | 180,000 | -180,000 | $5.45 |
| Kaplan Matthew D | Open Market Purchase | 7.11.2025 | 19,650 | +19,650 | $7.64 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 26.9.2025 | 2,313 | -2,313 | $11.45 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 25.9.2025 | 1,696 | -1,696 | $11.45 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 23.9.2025 | 1,490 | -1,490 | $11.45 |
| Davis Keri | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.9.2025 | 2,725 | -2,725 | $11.43 |
| Kleinman Adam M | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.9.2025 | 1,361 | -1,361 | $11.43 |
| Kaplan Matthew D | Tax Withholding in Shares | 23.9.2025 | 8,211 | -8,211 | $11.43 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.9.2025 | 48,248 | -48,248 | $11.45 |
| Great Elm Group, Inc. | Other Transaction | 20.9.2025 | 63,189 | -63,189 | — |
| Davis Keri | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 1,406 | +1,406 | — |
| Davis Keri | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 3,820 | +3,820 | — |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 19.9.2025 | 14,737 | -14,737 | $11.45 |
| Kaplan Matthew D | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 37,117 | +37,117 | — |
| Kleinman Adam M | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 5,458 | +5,458 | — |
| Great Elm Group, Inc. | Other Transaction | 19.9.2025 | 16,612 | -16,612 | — |
| Kleinman Adam M | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 156 | +156 | — |
| Kaplan Matthew D | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.9.2025 | 1,055 | +1,055 | — |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 18.9.2025 | 100 | -100 | $11.45 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 15.9.2025 | 20,938 | -20,938 | $11.45 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 26.8.2025 | 21,472 | -21,472 | $11.20 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 25.8.2025 | 25,711 | -25,711 | $11.20 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 22.8.2025 | 17,956 | -17,956 | $11.20 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 21.8.2025 | 26,705 | -26,705 | $11.20 |
| Great Elm Strategic Partnership I, LLC | Open Market Sale | 20.8.2025 | 7,793 | -7,793 | $11.20 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,861 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,930 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
61.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 52.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology