Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$62.81
▲ $3.67 (+6.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 08:06 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$10.82B
Day Range
$60.37 - $62.97
52-Week Range
$44.98 - $99.12
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
$47.86
Resistance
$63.28
-31.9% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/15 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: -106.2%
Growth
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
GBTC exhibits a **moderate overall score of 63**, driven primarily by strong technical performance and positive news sentiment, though tempered by significant fundamental and growth weaknesses. The technical category scores an impressive **87**, reflecting robust momentum with the price above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 66.4—indicating healthy upward momentum despite being overbought (%K 84.5). However, the **fundamental score of 48** and **growth score of 44** are severely dragged down by a **net income decline of -106.2%** and a **negative return on assets (-6.9%)**, signaling operational inefficiencies. Valuation remains neutral at **50**, while the **news score of 86** highlights positive narratives around Bitcoin’s correlation with gold and technical analysis, though these are largely speculative. Risk metrics show volatility (ATR 2.8%) and a balanced Calmar ratio (1.00), but the declining volume despite price gains raises concerns about weakening institutional interest. The interplay of speculative momentum and structural weaknesses creates a nuanced profile: short-term technical strength contrasts with long-term fundamental fragility.
The stock demonstrates strong short-term momentum, with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 66.4—though it is technically overbought (%K 84.5).
Technical strength suggests near-term buying pressure, but overbought conditions may signal potential reversal risks.
GBTC exhibits severe financial distress, with a **net income decline of -106.2%** and a **return on assets of -6.9%**, indicating poor profitability and asset utilization.
Such metrics suggest underlying operational challenges that could limit sustainable growth or value.
The company’s net income growth is catastrophically negative at **-106.2%**, reflecting a complete collapse in earnings power.
This signals a lack of revenue or cost-control improvements, raising doubts about future expansion.
No specific valuation metrics (e.g., P/E, P/B) are provided, but the neutral score implies the stock trades at a premium relative to fundamentals without clear justification.
Lack of valuation clarity makes it difficult to assess whether the price reflects intrinsic value or speculative demand.
Recent news is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple articles highlighting Bitcoin’s correlation with gold and technical analysis trends, though none are materially impactful beyond sentiment.
Positive news can drive speculative interest but does not address fundamental or operational concerns.
The stock exhibits moderate volatility (ATR 2.8%) and a balanced Calmar ratio (1.00), but declining volume despite price gains suggests weakening liquidity or interest.
Volume trends are critical for confirming institutional participation, and their decline may indicate a potential shift in market dynamics.
StockIQ conclusion
GBTC’s profile is defined by a **contrasting duality**: strong technical momentum and speculative news sentiment coexist with severe fundamental and growth weaknesses. While short-term traders may find appeal in the stock’s upward trajectory and overbought conditions, long-term investors face significant hurdles, including negative earnings and declining volume. The absence of clear valuation metrics further complicates assessments, leaving the stock’s trajectory dependent on speculative demand rather than intrinsic strength. Risk tolerance and time horizon will dictate how investors interpret this mixed picture.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $62.81
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 6 to 33 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
4d ago · $58.72
Evidence: Narrative Gap moved from 30 to -1 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
44
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
79
Risk
50
Sentiment
44
Fundamental
48
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on the Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (and related Bitcoin exposure) has focused on broader market volatility, macroeconomic trends, and speculative trading dynamics. Headlines highlight Bitcoin’s price fluctuations tied to Federal Reserve rate hike speculation, its rising correlation with gold, and the performance of Bitcoin-linked ETFs like BITX. Analysts discuss Bitcoin’s role as a hedge against rising bond yields and Treasury debt expansion, while broader themes include the intersection of crypto, AI, and speculative markets amid economic uncertainty. No direct Grayscale-specific updates are present in these sources.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF. News trend score: 44. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 5 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
85
Fundamentals
48
Technical
79
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+29%
Market Narrative
48
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-2
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
GBTC’s psychology is dominated by **FOMO**, driven by rapid price gains (+16.5% ROC), overbought conditions (RSI 69), and extreme bullish sentiment (92/100). The **narrative-reality gap (30 points)** suggests traders may be overestimating upside potential, while the **2.5% proximity to resistance** hints at potential anchoring—justifying current prices without strong fundamentals. Euphoria lingers but is tempered by muted volume (0.83x avg) and volatility (1.44x ATR), which could signal caution rather than blind optimism. The key question: *Will traders exit before resistance tests, or will momentum sustain despite overbought signals?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:56 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Bitcoin is trading on hike odds, falling from 81K to 76K on Warsh's hawkish tone and rebounding to 82.2K on Waller's dovish turn."
"Bitcoin's rally sent miner stocks soaring... Bitcoin-Gold correlation tops 50%"
"Bitcoin surged from the 64k range to above 81k... Watch 83k for a real breakout."
"Incremental institutional inflows have an outsized impact on AUM growth and relevance."
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 72/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 6/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for GBTC reveals a deep divide between methodologies rooted in technical price action and those reliant on fundamental or cyclical analysis. Jesse Livermore’s high score and positive trend verdict suggest the stock’s price movement aligns with his momentum-driven principles, while the majority of value-oriented investors—from Graham to Lynch—struggle due to insufficient traditional financial data, leaving them unable to form a clear opinion. Meanwhile, behavioral and market-cycle analysts like Mackay, Marks, and Nelson flag red flags, interpreting the stock’s trajectory as either a speculative bubble or an overbought cycle, contrasting sharply with Livermore’s bullish technical read. Even passive approaches like Efficient Market Theory dismiss the stock’s pickability, further isolating Livermore’s methodology as an outlier in this debate.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 72
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 58
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 49
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 34
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 6
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 2 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
-6.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$0
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 9 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 19.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
etf.com · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 5.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 4.9.2026
MoneyShow · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Grayscale Bitcoin Trust ETF (GBTC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
GBTC currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
GBTC's technical score is 79/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 64.8 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: -106.2%; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; %K 91.2 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for GBTC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,792,536 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,880,159 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
46.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 38.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology