Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$190.74
▼ $4.33 (-2.2%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:40 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$19.59B
Day Range
$189.89 - $195.75
52-Week Range
$149.50 - $323.51
Beta
—
Next Earnings
26.10.2026
Support
$171.97
Resistance
$234.59
FTAI is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+7.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Revenue growth (last year)
Revenue growth (last year): 44.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$113.48 vs. price $190.74 (-159.5%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (68/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
57
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
68
Quality
50
Value
33
Momentum
42
Risk
42
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **FTAI Aviation Ltd.** has primarily focused on its strong market performance and investor attention. The company’s stock options have seen surging implied volatility, drawing investor scrutiny, while its 5-year annualized return of **53.29%**—outpacing the market—has been highlighted as a key outlier. However, broader industry trends, including SpaceX’s expansion and its potential impact on related stocks, have also been mentioned, though without direct FTAI-specific commentary. The limited coverage suggests focus remains on its financial growth rather than operational developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about FTAI Aviation Ltd.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
17
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
39
Psychology
42
Fundamentals
70
Technical
42
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-31%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
39
Narrative Gap
+26
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests **herding** as the dominant state, driven by relative underperformance against peers (-1.4% vs. -2.0%). Elevated volume (1.19x avg) and extreme sentiment (100/100) indicate speculative activity, but negative momentum (-6.9% ROC) and neutral RSI (44) temper euphoria. Loss aversion (25) may persist due to recent declines (-16.1% in 3 months), while overconfidence (0) is absent—price underperforms fundamentals (+15.4% EPS growth). The key question: *Will traders double down on herding despite weak momentum, or will loss aversion trigger selective selling?*
Updated: 09/09/2026, 12:45 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$1000 invested in FTAI 5 years ago would be worth more today, outperforming the market by 42.0% annually"
"Companies that cannot maintain growth are often penalized with large declines in market value"
"SpaceX’s expansion is creating a bottleneck to AI growth and dragging down aerospace stocks"
📈 13D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Thorstein Veblen — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s starkly divided verdicts reflect a clash between growth-oriented and risk-averse methodologies. Veblen, Lynch, and Nelson all see strong potential—Veblen highlights real value creation, Lynch spots undervalued growth, and Nelson flags a favorable cycle position—while Fisher and Marks (Market Cycle) still find it solid but not exceptional. Meanwhile, the lower-scoring camp, from Graham’s defensive criteria to Livermore’s trend aversion and Housel’s volatility concerns, paints a picture of overvaluation or unsustainable risk. The divide underscores whether the stock’s momentum (backed by cycle and growth models) outweighs its structural risks (flagged by Graham, Loeb, and Livermore), with passive or contrarian investors like Malkiel/Bogle and Housel dismissing it outright.
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 93
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 88
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 75
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 69
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 67
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 57
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 54
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 50
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 36
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 32
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 31
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 20
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
46.2%
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
20.0%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
149.9%
ROA
11.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$4.66
Cash
$300.48M
Total Debt
$3.45B
Current Ratio
5.28
Debt/Equity
10.32
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 12.8.2026 | $0.500 |
| 13.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 12.5.2026 | $0.450 |
| 13.3.2026 | $0.400 |
| 12.3.2026 | $0.400 |
| 10.11.2025 | $0.350 |
| 9.11.2025 | $0.350 |
| 12.8.2025 | $0.300 |
| 11.8.2025 | $0.300 |
| 16.5.2025 | $0.300 |
| 15.5.2025 | $0.300 |
| 14.3.2025 | $0.300 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$190.74
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$113.48
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-159.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
25.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 25.0% | $-423.07M | $-388.14M |
| 2 | 19.4% | $-505.04M | $-425.08M |
| 3 | 13.8% | $-574.48M | $-443.61M |
| 4 | 8.1% | $-621.16M | $-440.05M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-636.69M | $-413.81M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-338.46M
Terminal Value
$-10.04B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-6.53B
Enterprise Value
$-8.64B
Net Debt
$3.15B
Equity Value
$-11.78B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$3.22
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.12
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
ChartMill · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
Zacks · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
FTAI Aviation Ltd. (FTAI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 57/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FTAI currently scores 57/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FTAI's estimated fair value is -$113.48, which is 159.5% below the current price of $190.74. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FTAI's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Revenue growth (last year): 44.5%; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 1537.5%; Net income growth: 5671.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$113.48 vs. price $190.74 (-159.5%); ATR: 5.4% of price; Free cash flow growth: -71.7%.
Yes — FTAI has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yoon BoHee | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.9.2026 | 398 | -398 | $190.10 |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 3,673 | -3,673 | — |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Gift | 10.8.2026 | 56,552 | -3,673 | — |
| Moreno David | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 2,475 | +2,475 | $201.27 |
| Moreno David | Open Market Purchase | 31.7.2026 | 199,490 | +2,475 | $201.27 |
| Moreno David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 41,475 | -41,475 | $270.53 |
| Kuperus Stacy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 17,973 | -17,973 | $270.53 |
| Moreno David | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 197,015 | -41,475 | $270.53 |
| Kuperus Stacy | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.7.2026 | 72,653 | -17,973 | $270.53 |
| GOODWIN PAUL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 124 | +124 | — |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 119 | +119 | — |
| TUCHMAN MARTIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 86 | +86 | — |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 60,225 | +119 | — |
| GOODWIN PAUL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 82,912 | +124 | — |
| TUCHMAN MARTIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 193,764 | +86 | — |
| HANNAWAY JUDITH A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| TUCHMAN MARTIN | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| LEVISON A ANDREW | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| Adams Joseph P. Jr. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 28.5.2026 | 10,783 | -10,783 | $262.78 |
| GOODWIN PAUL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| GIDUMAL SHYAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 552 | +552 | — |
| GIDUMAL SHYAM H | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 2,221 | +552 | — |
| ROBINSON RAY M | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 60,106 | +552 | — |
| GOODWIN PAUL R | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 82,788 | +552 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
6,707,889 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,954,418 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.3% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology