Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$4.98
▲ $0.03 (+0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/20 04:35 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/20/2026
News analyzed: 09/20/2026
Market Cap
$3.19B
Day Range
$4.89 - $5.05
52-Week Range
$4.47 - $36.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
Support
$4.50
Resistance
$7.68
FRMI is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-84.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/20 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.24
Risk
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$23.74 vs. price $4.98 (-576.6%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
55
Value
38
Momentum
42
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
41
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Fermi Inc.** has centered on its aggressive expansion in AI-driven data center infrastructure, particularly its **Project Matador** in Texas, which aligns with Governor Greg Abbott’s push for behind-the-meter power solutions. The company faces regulatory scrutiny, including a **subpoena from the Eastern District of New York** over Matador, while institutional investors remain bullish on its growth potential amid rising AI compute demand. Analysts highlight its strategic real estate and power advantages, though some have adjusted price targets downward.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Fermi Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
23
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
41
Technical
42
Valuation
38
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-48%
Market Narrative
65
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
+13
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
Market behavior suggests FRMI is tracking its peer group, with a –3.2% move mirroring the –4.2% peer decline, supporting the dominant herding state. The notable loss‑aversion score (56) indicates participants may be reluctant to add to positions after a 20.4% three‑month drop, while low panic‑selling and FOMO scores point to limited aggressive trading despite upbeat news sentiment. This mix hints at a cautious conformity bias rather than exuberance. The key question remains whether a new catalyst could disrupt the current herd dynamics.
Updated: 09/10/2026, 02:10 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Fermi shares fall after receiving subpoena from Eastern District of New York Over Project Matador"
"AI is fueling data center demand as new supply tightens"
"Governor Greg Abbott’s Texas Data Center Directive reinforces Fermi’s behind-the-meter, multi-gigawatt power strategy"
"Macquarie lowers price target from $18 to $15 while maintaining Outperform rating"
📈 12D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Howard Marks (Market Cycle) — 81/100
🔴 Weakest match
Thorstein Veblen — 13/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some models seeing potential while others flag significant red flags. The highest-scoring approaches—Peter Lynch’s near-perfect 100 and Charles Mackay’s 86—suggest it lacks obvious speculative bubbles or sufficient growth data to dismiss outright, though Lynch’s verdict hints at uncertainty. Meanwhile, Howard Marks’ cycle-based models (85 and 78) lean cautiously positive, viewing it as early-to-mid cycle with room to run, contrasting sharply with Jesse Livermore’s 12 and Thorstein Veblen’s 13, which warn of trend resistance and growth-chasing behavior. Benjamin Graham’s mixed verdict (66) and the near-zero Enterprising Investor score reflect valuation ambiguity, while Philip Fisher’s 50 and Gerald Loeb’s 45 underscore a lack of clear long-term fundamentals or risk tolerance. The efficient-market camp (36) dismisses it as unexceptional, leaving FRMI caught between cyclical optimism and fundamental skepticism.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 10%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 77
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 77
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 68
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 64
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 58
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 54
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 45
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 44
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 35
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 0
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 243 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 5 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-44.4%
ROA
-34.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$1.13
Cash
$408.53M
Total Debt
$258.79M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.24
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Not enough data to compute signals.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$4.98
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$23.74
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-576.6%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $-663.80M | $-608.99M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $-717.73M | $-604.10M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $-762.59M | $-588.86M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $-795.96M | $-563.88M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-815.86M | $-530.25M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-603.46M
Terminal Value
$-12.87B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-8.36B
Enterprise Value
$-11.26B
Net Debt
$-149.74M
Equity Value
$-11.11B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$2.34
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$2.34
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
PR Newswire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 23.8.2026
Insider Monkey · 21.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
MT Newswires · 14.8.2026
Moby · 14.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 14.8.2026
Fermi Inc. (FRMI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 48/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
FRMI currently scores 48/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, FRMI's estimated fair value is -$23.74, which is 576.6% below the current price of $4.98. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
FRMI's technical score is 42/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.24; MACD histogram is positive — rising momentum; Debt/equity: 0.24.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$23.74 vs. price $4.98 (-576.6%); ATR: 8.3% of price; Return on equity (ROE): -44.4% (negative).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for FRMI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 8 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Ortiz Blanes Jacobo | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 5,616,151 | +147,059 | — |
| Ortiz Blanes Jacobo | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2026 | 147,059 | +147,059 | — |
| MCINTIRE LEE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.8.2026 | 468,750 | +468,750 | — |
| Perry James Richard | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 863,637 | -863,637 | $7.31 |
| Perry James Richard | Open Market Sale | 30.6.2026 | 15,827,807 | -863,637 | $7.31 |
| Uzman Mesut | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 79,509 | -79,509 | $6.31 |
| Uzman Mesut | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 79,032 | -79,032 | $6.31 |
| Uzman Mesut | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 670,968 | -79,032 | $6.31 |
| Uzman Mesut | Open Market Sale | 3.6.2026 | 670,491 | -79,509 | $6.31 |
| Everson Miles E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 35,818 | +35,818 | — |
| Haas Marius | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 175,094 | +175,094 | — |
| Stein Jeffrey Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 250,000 | +250,000 | — |
| Perry James Richard | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 175,094 | +175,094 | — |
| Robbin-Coker Cordel | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 175,094 | +175,094 | — |
| Kellerman Lawrence M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 35,818 | +35,818 | — |
| MCINTIRE LEE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 175,094 | +175,094 | — |
| MCINTIRE LEE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 316,163 | +175,094 | — |
| Haas Marius | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 1,075,094 | +175,094 | — |
| Stein Jeffrey Scott | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 250,000 | +250,000 | — |
| Perry James Richard | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 16,691,444 | +175,094 | — |
| Robbin-Coker Cordel | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 175,094 | +175,094 | — |
| Everson Miles E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 10,005,519 | +35,818 | — |
| Kellerman Lawrence M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.6.2026 | 35,818 | +35,818 | — |
| Everson Miles E. | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 427,004 | -427,004 | $4.58 |
| Ortiz Blanes Jacobo | Open Market Sale | 9.4.2026 | 427,363 | -427,363 | $4.58 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
60,420,542 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 47,141,154 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
51.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 50.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology