Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NASDAQ
$18.47
▲ $0.32 (+1.8%)
Market data updated: 09/17 03:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$7.11B
Day Range
$18.32 - $18.73
52-Week Range
$11.53 - $36.04
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
-46.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/15 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.22 (3y annualized return -15.0% / max drawdown 67.9%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Ethereum ETF (ETHA) exhibits a **moderate overall score of 62**, driven primarily by strong technical and news-driven momentum but tempered by severe fundamental and growth challenges. The stock’s technical indicators are robust, with the price surpassing both 50-day and 200-day averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 67.8, signaling healthy upward momentum. However, the %K reading of 87.4 suggests overbought conditions, which could indicate a potential near-term pullback. News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, fueled by crypto market tailwinds—including Bitcoin’s rally to $80,000 and supportive Fed commentary—that have propelled crypto-linked stocks higher. Yet, the fundamental and growth metrics are alarmingly weak, with EPS growth plummeting by **1090.5%** and net income growth collapsing by **6827.4%**, reflecting deep operational struggles. Valuation is also distorted by a negative P/E ratio of **-2.5**, hinting at speculative trading rather than traditional profitability. Risk remains elevated due to a historically volatile Calmar ratio of **-0.22**, underscoring the stock’s susceptibility to sharp drawdowns despite recent gains. The interplay of speculative momentum and unsustainable fundamentals creates a mixed picture, where short-term crypto enthusiasm contrasts sharply with long-term financial fragility.
The stock shows strong bullish technicals, with prices above both 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram, and an RSI of 67.8 indicating momentum. However, the %K reading of 87.4 suggests overbought conditions, which may signal a near-term correction.
Technical strength suggests short-term buying pressure, but overbought signals could trigger a pullback if momentum stalls.
No explicit fundamental data is provided, but the absence of positive evidence aligns with the broader concerns of speculative trading rather than traditional profitability.
Fundamental weakness implies the stock lacks traditional earnings-based support, relying instead on market sentiment.
Earnings per share growth is down **1090.5%**, and net income growth has collapsed by **6827.4%**, indicating severe contraction in profitability.
Extreme negative growth signals deep operational challenges that could persist unless fundamental issues are addressed.
The P/E ratio is **-2.5**, reflecting a speculative valuation with no traditional earnings foundation.
A negative P/E suggests the stock is priced based on speculative expectations rather than profitability.
News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, driven by Bitcoin’s rally, Fed commentary, and crypto market tailwinds, with only one mildly negative article.
Positive news sentiment has fueled recent price appreciation but may not address underlying financial weaknesses.
The Calmar ratio is **-0.22**, indicating a 3-year annualized return of **-15.2%** with a max drawdown of **67.9%**, while ATR is **3.2%** of price.
Extreme volatility and negative risk-adjusted returns highlight the stock’s high susceptibility to sharp drawdowns.
StockIQ conclusion
Ethereum ETF (ETHA) presents a **moderate score of 62**, where strong technical momentum and positive news sentiment drive short-term appeal, but severe fundamental and growth weaknesses create significant long-term risks. The stock’s performance is heavily dependent on speculative crypto market dynamics, with no traditional earnings support. While recent gains reflect broader sector tailwinds, the extreme volatility and negative risk-adjusted returns underscore the speculative nature of the investment. Investors should closely monitor whether the current momentum translates into sustainable fundamentals or remains tied to external market conditions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
38
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
65
Risk
42
Sentiment
92
Fundamental
50
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about iShares Ethereum Trust ETF. News trend score: 92. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
24
Fundamentals
50
Technical
65
Valuation
50
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+43%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior suggests a dominant **overconfidence** bias, where price momentum (16.6% ROC) vastly exceeds fundamental growth (-10.9% EPS). FOMO and euphoria (54) further indicate detached optimism, with the stock trading 21.5% above its 200-day average. The **narrative gap** (28) widens optimism vs. reality, while anchoring (34) hints at resistance-based valuation inertia. The key question: *Will fundamentals eventually correct the overvaluation, or will momentum sustain confidence?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:48 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"$477M flows into Bitcoin, Ethereum ETFs as 9-day crypto buying streak rolls on"
"Ether was up 20% this week, while Bitcoin was up 9%"
"BlackRock's newest Ethereum fund is gathering assets quickly"
"FETH’s independent infrastructure offers a structural hedge against counterparty concentration risk"
📈 8D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 61/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock divides the historical methodologies sharply, with only Jesse Livermore’s high-scoring (81) technical trend-following approach seeing clear upside, while the rest either lack sufficient data or flag significant red flags. Livermore’s verdict suggests the price action aligns with his documented principles of momentum and trend confirmation, but Graham, Fisher, and Bagehot all score mid-range (50) due to insufficient fundamental or balance-sheet details—meaning their models can’t fully evaluate the stock’s intrinsic value. Meanwhile, the cautionary voices—from Howard Marks’ late-cycle warning (37) to Charles Mackay’s crowd-delusion alert (30)—highlight concerns about valuation, risk, or speculative bubbles, while Lynch, Smith, and Nelson’s near-zero scores reflect a lack of growth or dividend signals that would justify their methodologies. The contrast underscores a clear divide: momentum traders see opportunity, while value, dividend, and cycle-focused investors either dismiss it or treat it with extreme skepticism.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 57
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 57
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 53
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 35
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 12
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 0
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 280 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (6 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
—
ROIC
—
EPS
-$7.33
Cash
—
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 9 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Benzinga · 17.9.2026
Benzinga · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
etf.com · 9.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.9.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
etf.com · 29.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 25.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 24.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Benzinga · 20.8.2026
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ETHA currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ETHA's technical score is 65/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 59.5 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.22 (3y annualized return -15.0% / max drawdown 67.9%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -1090.5%; Net income growth: -6827.4%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ETHA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,548,287 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 36,887,678 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
48.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 54.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology