Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$35.70
▼ $0.34 (-0.9%)
Market data updated: 09/26 03:34 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/26/2026
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$1.83B
Day Range
$34.91 - $36.50
52-Week Range
$32.35 - $45.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
20.10.2026
Support
$33.65
Resistance
$37.98
EPAC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-10.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/28 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 36.1%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 3 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 3
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
56
Quality
63
Value
50
Momentum
36
Risk
54
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
83
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Enerpac Tool Group Corp.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 11 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
12
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
13
Fundamentals
83
Technical
36
Valuation
50
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
-3%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 89/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 27/100
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 89
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 71
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 68
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 66
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 61
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 61
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 46
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 28
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 287 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$33.65
Range Bottom
$37.98
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
50.5%
Operating Margin
21.6%
Net Margin
15.0%
EBITDA Margin
24.2%
ROE
21.4%
ROA
11.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.72
Cash
$151.56M
Total Debt
$189.67M
Current Ratio
2.74
Debt/Equity
0.44
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 7.10.2025 | $0.040 |
| 6.10.2025 | $0.040 |
| 7.10.2024 | $0.040 |
| 6.10.2024 | $0.040 |
| 5.10.2023 | $0.040 |
| 4.10.2023 | $0.040 |
| 6.10.2022 | $0.040 |
| 5.10.2022 | $0.040 |
| 30.9.2021 | $0.040 |
| 29.9.2021 | $0.040 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$7.96
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.78
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 6 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 11 articles.
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 31.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 29.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 27.7.2026
GlobeNewswire · 23.7.2026
Insider Monkey · 15.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.7.2026
MarketBeat · 9.7.2026
Milwaukee Journal Sentinel · 9.7.2026
Zacks · 9.7.2026
MT Newswires · 8.7.2026
Enerpac Tool Group Corp. (EPAC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
EPAC currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
EPAC's technical score is 36/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Return on equity (ROE): 21.4% — strong; Debt/equity: 0.44.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.31 (3y annualized return 11.1% / max drawdown 36.1%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — EPAC has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 4 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Chack Eric Theodore | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.9.2026 | 23,984 | -1,745 | $34.59 |
| Cunningham Danny L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | +2,930 | $26.95 |
| Ferland E James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | -2,930 | — |
| Cunningham Danny L | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | -2,930 | $34.35 |
| Ferland E James Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | -2,930 | $34.35 |
| Ferland E James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | +2,930 | $26.95 |
| Cunningham Danny L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 2,930 | -2,930 | — |
| Ferland E James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 102,611 | +2,930 | $26.95 |
| Ferland E James Jr | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 99,681 | -2,930 | $34.35 |
| Ferland E James Jr | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -2,930 | — |
| Cunningham Danny L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 26,960 | +2,930 | $26.95 |
| Cunningham Danny L | Open Market Sale | 23.7.2026 | 24,030 | -2,930 | $34.35 |
| Cunningham Danny L | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 23.7.2026 | 0 | -2,930 | — |
| Dawson Patrick James | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 1,088 | -1,088 | $35.87 |
| Dawson Patrick James | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.3.2026 | 4,770 | -1,088 | $35.87 |
| Healy Colleen | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| Simmons Sidney S. II | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| Cunningham Danny L | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| Holder Richard D | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| Clarkson J. Palmer | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| MINELLA LYNN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 3,134 | +3,134 | — |
| Ferland E James Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 5,545 | +5,545 | — |
| MINELLA LYNN C | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 16,657 | +3,134 | — |
| Holder Richard D | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 20,391 | +3,134 | — |
| Ferland E James Jr | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.2.2026 | 99,681 | +5,545 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,798,765 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 1,703,024 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
56.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 64.6% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology