Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$47.73
▼ $0.03 (-0.1%)
Market data updated: 09/26 02:52 AM
News analyzed: 09/26/2026
Market Cap
$5.87B
Day Range
$47.34 - $47.87
52-Week Range
$46.87 - $55.49
Beta
—
Next Earnings
05.11.2026
Support
$47.50
Resistance
$55.49
EMA is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
+2.2% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 1.5% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.48 (3y annualized return 9.6% / max drawdown 20.0%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
26
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
6
Risk
50
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Emera Incorporated has primarily focused on its recent asset divestiture and strategic leadership changes. The company completed the sale of the New Mexico Gas Company to Bernhard Capital Partners in August 2026, marking a key transaction in its portfolio. Additionally, Emera’s Q2 2026 earnings call and a lowered price target by Barclays analyst Michael Lonegan (from $55 to $53) drew attention to its financial performance and market outlook. Meanwhile, a related company, NU E Power Corp., appointed John Windsor—a former Emera executive—as its new Chief Operating Officer, signaling potential industry shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Emera Incorporated Common. News trend score: 62. Reason: 6 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
20
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
—
Technical
6
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-11%
Market Narrative
42
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-8
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (score 54) reflects traders’ fixation on the 2.3% support level, likely due to recent price action. Herding (48) is present but passive, as the stock’s marginal outperformance (+0.1%) aligns with peers without aggressive momentum. The narrative-reality gap (-6) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment (44) and technical reality (50), but no extreme bias is evident. The key question is whether traders will break or hold above support, given the absence of panic or euphoria.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 12:55 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Earnings Call Highlights: Strategic Divestitures and Strong..."
"lowers the price target from $55 to $53"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for EMA reflects deep methodological differences between investors who prioritize macro or cyclical positioning and those who demand granular, fundamental scrutiny. The highest-scoring methodologies—Smith, Mackay, and Housel—either lack sufficient data to form a concrete opinion (like Smith and Fisher) or focus on broader, less quantifiable signals (e.g., Mackay’s crowd psychology or Housel’s patient, qualitative compounding thesis). Meanwhile, the mid-tier scores (Nelson, Schwager, and Marks) lean toward cyclical or risk-adjusted frameworks, where EMA’s valuation or technical setup appears favorable but not yet extreme. In contrast, the lowest scores—Graham, Lynch, and Livermore—either dismiss the stock due to insufficient data or because it fails to meet their strict, data-driven thresholds (e.g., Livermore’s lack of a clear trend or Veblen’s uncertainty about profit sustainability). The contrast underscores how some investors thrive on qualitative intuition or macro trends, while others demand ironclad fundamentals or technical clarity.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 100
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 82
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 81
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 68
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 59
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 286 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 31.7.2026 | $0.523 |
| 30.7.2026 | $0.523 |
| 1.5.2026 | $0.539 |
| 30.4.2026 | $0.539 |
| 1.8.2025 | $0.522 |
| 31.7.2025 | $0.522 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.526 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.526 |
| 31.1.2025 | $0.500 |
| 30.1.2025 | $0.500 |
| 1.11.2024 | $0.520 |
| 31.10.2024 | $0.520 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 6 positive, 10 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 21.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
MT Newswires · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
TMX Newsfile · 25.8.2026
Offshore Technology · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
PR Newswire · 12.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 11.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
MarketBeat · 9.8.2026
Motley Fool · 8.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 7.8.2026
MT Newswires · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Emera Incorporated Common (EMA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for EMA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
EMA's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 1.5% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.48 (3y annualized return 9.6% / max drawdown 20.0%); Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average.
Yes — EMA has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
5,761,875 shares short as of 2026-09-15 · vs. 5,560,167 on 2026-08-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.7% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 43.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology