Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$188.19
▲ $2.93 (+1.6%)
Market data updated: 09/22 12:22 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$2.92B
Day Range
$185.47 - $188.81
52-Week Range
$84.04 - $208.00
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$147.15
Resistance
$208.00
DXPE is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+62.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 15/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.3%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $30.47 vs. price $188.19 (-83.8%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
62
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
72
Risk
58
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
52
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of DXP Enterprises, Inc. has centered on its strong Q2 2026 earnings performance, highlighting record sales, robust EBITDA growth, and steady profit margins. Analysts praised its strategic acquisitions and expansion in the water infrastructure sector, with some raising price targets and maintaining an overweight rating. The company’s stock was frequently noted as a standout performer among maintenance and repair distributors, sparking speculation about its long-term upside potential.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about DXP Enterprises, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 15 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
44
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
51
Fundamentals
52
Technical
72
Valuation
33
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+14%
Market Narrative
82
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+41
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DXPE’s psychology is dominated by overconfidence, where traders prioritize narrative-driven optimism (e.g., 504% DCF premium) over fundamental misalignment. The narrative gap (72 vs. 41) amplifies this, as extreme sentiment (100/100) decouples from weak momentum (-3.9% ROC). Herding is selective, favoring DXPE’s outperformance over peers, while muted volume and volatility rule out panic or FOMO. The key question: *Will traders pivot from detached euphoria to reality when momentum fails to materialize?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:42 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Q2 earnings outperformers: DXPE and record sales/EBITDA fueled growth"
"Acquisitions and water platform propel growth"
"Price target raised from $160 to $220 with Overweight rating"
"Margins hold steady despite growth"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 69/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for DXPE reflects deep methodological contrasts between cyclical, growth-oriented, and defensive investors. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score suggests the stock’s oversold cycle position aligns with his contrarian, momentum-driven approach, while Thorstein Veblen’s endorsement highlights its real-value growth alignment. Meanwhile, Peter Lynch’s caution stems from his belief that the stock’s price already discounts its growth, a perspective shared by the efficient-market camp—Bogle and Malkiel—who see no clear edge over passive indexing. On the other end, Graham’s defensive framework and Morgan Housel’s volatility concerns underscore a consensus among value and patience-based investors that the stock lacks the stability or margin of safety they demand, despite its speculative appeal to trend-followers like Livermore or late-cycle skeptics like Howard Marks.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 69
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 69
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 59
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 46
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 44
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 37
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 37
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 34
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 24
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 23
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 15
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 8
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
31.5%
Operating Margin
8.8%
Net Margin
4.4%
EBITDA Margin
8.8%
ROE
17.8%
ROA
5.3%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.65
Cash
$303.78M
Total Debt
$827.06M
Current Ratio
3.34
Debt/Equity
1.66
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$188.19
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$30.47
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-83.8%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.9% | $59.84M | $54.90M |
| 2 | 8.8% | $65.10M | $54.79M |
| 3 | 6.7% | $69.45M | $53.63M |
| 4 | 4.6% | $72.64M | $51.46M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $74.45M | $48.39M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$53.98M
Terminal Value
$1.17B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$763.05M
Enterprise Value
$1.03B
Net Debt
$523.27M
Equity Value
$502.94M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$30.20
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$4.69
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 15 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockStory · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 26.8.2026
StockStory · 18.8.2026
StockStory · 14.8.2026
Motley Fool · 13.8.2026
StockStory · 12.8.2026
StockStory · 10.8.2026
Simply Wall St. · 9.8.2026
Benzinga · 7.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 6.8.2026
MarketBeat · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Moby · 6.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 6.8.2026
Benzinga · 5.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 16.7.2026
DXP Enterprises, Inc. (DXPE) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 62/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DXPE currently scores 62/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DXPE's estimated fair value is $30.47, which is 83.8% below the current price of $188.19. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DXPE's technical score is 72/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 27.3%; Net income growth: 25.8%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $30.47 vs. price $188.19 (-83.8%); Free cash flow growth: -30.0%; Debt/equity: 1.66.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DXPE.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LITTLE DAVID R | Gift | 29.7.2026 | 50,000 | -50,000 | — |
| MANNES JOSEPH R | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 648 | +648 | $165.90 |
| MANNES JOSEPH R | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.7.2026 | 14,612 | +648 | $165.90 |
| Hoffman Karen | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 648 | +648 | $165.90 |
| HALTER TIMOTHY P | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 648 | +648 | $165.90 |
| Patton David | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 648 | +648 | $165.90 |
| HALTER TIMOTHY P | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 30,648 | +648 | $165.90 |
| Patton David | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 24,992 | +648 | $165.90 |
| Hoffman Karen | Grant/Award from Employer | 7.7.2026 | 5,435 | +648 | $165.90 |
| Santos David Molero | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 1,100 | -1,100 | $171.50 |
| Santos David Molero | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 4,549 | -1,100 | $171.50 |
| MAESTAS PAZ | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $164.37 |
| MAESTAS PAZ | Open Market Sale | 11.6.2026 | 590,262 | -10,000 | $164.37 |
| Santos David Molero | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 194 | -194 | $144.20 |
| Santos David Molero | Tax Withholding in Shares | 29.5.2026 | 5,649 | -194 | $144.20 |
| HALTER TIMOTHY P | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 6,842 | -6,842 | $141.59 |
| HALTER TIMOTHY P | Open Market Sale | 21.5.2026 | 30,000 | -6,842 | $141.59 |
| LITTLE DAVID R | Gift | 15.5.2026 | 90,000 | -90,000 | — |
| LITTLE DAVID R | Gift | 15.5.2026 | 1,126,761 | -90,000 | — |
| LITTLE DAVID R | Gift | 7.5.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | — |
| LITTLE DAVID R | Gift | 7.5.2026 | 1,216,761 | -1,000 | — |
| LITTLE NICHOLAS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.4.2026 | 5,821 | -5,821 | $138.82 |
| LITTLE NICHOLAS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.4.2026 | 798,740 | -5,821 | $138.82 |
| Santos David Molero | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.4.2026 | 603 | -603 | $138.04 |
| LITTLE DAVID R | Tax Withholding in Shares | 8.4.2026 | 22,501 | -22,501 | $138.82 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
351,904 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 392,605 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
64.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 51.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology