Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$10.89
▲ $0.11 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/21 09:58 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$1.74B
Day Range
$10.80 - $11.19
52-Week Range
$7.90 - $15.68
Beta
—
Next Earnings
28.10.2026
Support
$9.07
Resistance
$12.23
DXC is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-24.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $77.94 vs. price $10.89 (+615.7%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 4.6% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
26
Quality
58
Value
57
Momentum
37
Risk
34
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
41
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of DXC Technology has primarily focused on financial and market concerns, particularly its stock valuation and growth prospects. Analysts highlight weak second-quarter performance and question its long-term buying potential, with some suggesting it remains undervalued despite earnings. Comparisons to competitors like Accenture and broader industry trends, such as the expanding managed security services market, are also noted, though DXC itself is rarely the central focus. The headlines reflect cautious investor sentiment rather than major company-specific developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about DXC Technology Company. News trend score: 80. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 5 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
15
Fundamentals
41
Technical
37
Valuation
57
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+25%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
+0
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
DXC’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, as traders fixate on the 2.6% resistance gap, despite moderate FOMO and herding signals. The narrative-reality gap and overvaluation suggest confirmation bias may reinforce momentum, while euphoria is muted by extreme valuation metrics. The key question is whether traders will break the resistance anchor or adjust expectations as fundamentals remain stagnant. Low loss aversion and stable volatility imply no immediate panic, but anchoring could persist until a clear catalyst emerges.
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:19 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"DXC Technology (DXC) Faces A Valuation Test As Weak Q2 Raises Buying Question"
"The Bull Case For DXC Technology (DXC) Could Change Following New AI-Native Workplace And Security Platforms"
"DXC Technology (DXC) Stock Still Looks Cheap On Earnings But Weak On Growth"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 85/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The methodologies here split sharply between bullish and bearish views on DXC, reflecting starkly different priorities. Jesse Livermore’s high score suggests he’d see a positive trend based on price action, while the rest of the pack leans cautious or negative—especially Morgan Housel and Samuel Armstrong Nelson, who flag extreme volatility and overbought conditions. Graham’s mixed verdict and Marks’ caution highlight concerns about valuation or market expectations, while Fisher, Lynch, and Loeb dismiss the stock outright for lacking quality, growth, or stability. Meanwhile, Veblen and Bagehot warn of speculative or liquidity risks, while the efficient-market camp sees no clear edge over passive investing. The divide underscores whether DXC’s momentum or fundamentals justify a bet, or if its risks outweigh any potential rewards.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 85
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 85
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 72
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 65
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 52
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 39
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 35
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 30
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 23
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 21
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 20
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 8 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
7.7%
Net Margin
0.1%
EBITDA Margin
17.0%
ROE
0.6%
ROA
0.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.10
Cash
$1.74B
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
1.36
Debt/Equity
—
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$10.89
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$77.94
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+615.7%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-4.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -4.3% | $991.54M | $909.67M |
| 2 | -2.6% | $965.82M | $812.91M |
| 3 | -0.9% | $957.16M | $739.11M |
| 4 | 0.8% | $964.84M | $683.52M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $988.96M | $642.76M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.04B
Terminal Value
$15.60B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$10.14B
Enterprise Value
$13.92B
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$13.92B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$16.46
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.49
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 20.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Trefis · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Trefis · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
DXC Technology Company (DXC) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DXC currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DXC's estimated fair value is $77.94, which is 615.7% above the current price of $10.89. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DXC's technical score is 37/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $77.94 vs. price $10.89 (+615.7%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Price is above the 50-day average.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 4.6% of price; Calmar: -0.29 (3y annualized return -19.3% / max drawdown 67.2%); Revenue growth (last year): -1.8%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DXC.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gray Daniel J | Grant/Award from Employer | 17.8.2026 | 100,310 | +100,310 | — |
| Venkataraman Ramanathan | Tax Withholding in Shares | 14.8.2026 | 14,247 | -14,247 | $10.79 |
| WOODS ROBERT F | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| Teffner Carrie W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| Mayfield Pinkie Dent | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| ROGERS DAWN | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| BARNES DAVID A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| Gonzalez Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| Herzog David L | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 30,900 | +30,900 | — |
| Washington Akihiko | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 21,800 | +21,800 | — |
| WOODS ROBERT F | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 109,031 | +21,800 | — |
| BARNES DAVID A | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 86,800 | +21,800 | — |
| Herzog David L | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 147,301 | +30,900 | — |
| Teffner Carrie W. | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 72,700 | +21,800 | — |
| Mayfield Pinkie Dent | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 64,600 | +21,800 | — |
| ROGERS DAWN | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 79,300 | +21,800 | — |
| Gonzalez Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 56,100 | +21,800 | — |
| Washington Akihiko | Grant/Award from Employer | 4.8.2026 | 79,300 | +21,800 | — |
| Del Bene Robert F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 7,939 | -7,939 | $9.47 |
| Del Bene Robert F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 8,943 | -8,943 | $9.47 |
| Del Bene Robert F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 299,763 | -7,939 | $9.47 |
| Del Bene Robert F | Tax Withholding in Shares | 17.7.2026 | 290,820 | -8,943 | $9.47 |
| August Raymond Alexander | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.6.2026 | 21,596 | -21,596 | $9.23 |
| August Raymond Alexander | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.6.2026 | 394,562 | -21,596 | $9.23 |
| August Raymond Alexander | Tax Withholding in Shares | 15.6.2026 | 9,270 | -9,270 | $8.81 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
26,992,350 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 28,393,961 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
71.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 70.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology