Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Energy · ·
$3.14
▼ $0.11 (-3.4%)
Market data updated: 09/21 10:34 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$97.51M
Day Range
$3.00 - $3.24
52-Week Range
$1.50 - $7.85
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$2.54
Resistance
$7.45
DWSN is a stock from the Energy sector — Oil, gas, and renewable energy — highly volatile profitability, dependent on global commodity prices.
+82.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $5.54 vs. price $3.14 (+76.4%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Operating margin
Operating margin: -2.2% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
45
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
58
Value
62
Momentum
23
Risk
26
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
18
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Dawson Geophysical Company has primarily centered on its **Q2 2026 financial performance**, highlighting a **sharp 82% year-over-year revenue surge** alongside a **widening net loss** due to elevated costs—including strategic transactions, depreciation, and interest expenses—which led to a **22% stock decline**. Analysts also noted the company’s **strong year-to-date growth** (over 100% YTD) while initiating neutral coverage. No other significant developments were reported.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Dawson Geophysical Company. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 10 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
93
Fundamentals
18
Technical
23
Valuation
62
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-31%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
-4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The stock exhibits **Loss Aversion** as the dominant state, consistent with a recent 8.3% drop and muted trading activity. FOMO and overconfidence signals (momentum vs. fundamentals) suggest some speculative interest, but the valuation gap (-34% vs. DCF) and neutral RSI (48) temper euphoria. The **narrative-reality gap** (24 points) hints at a disconnect where optimism may outpace tangible progress. The key question: *Will traders hold despite losses, or will momentum-driven buyers re-engage?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 05:52 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Q2 revenues surge 82% y/y, but higher strategic transaction, depreciation and interest costs widen the company's net loss."
"Zacks Initiates Coverage of DWSN With Neutral Recommendation"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 92/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 1/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent verdicts reflect stark contrasts in how these methodologies weigh risk, valuation, and market psychology. Howard Marks’ cycle-based approach sees it as early-to-mid cycle, suggesting potential upside, while Gerald M. Loeb and Walter Bagehot flag it as high-risk due to liquidity and volatility concerns. Benjamin Graham’s strict valuation criteria dismiss it outright, whereas Peter Lynch acknowledges growth but notes the price has already priced in much of it. Meanwhile, Philip Fisher’s high bar for exceptional quality leaves him lukewarm, while Thorstein Veblen’s alignment with real value creation contrasts sharply with Samuel Nelson’s warning of an overbought cycle. The divide between the top-scoring cycle-conscious investors and the bottom-ranked liquidity-focused ones highlights whether the stock’s risks are justified by its growth potential or if it’s simply too speculative for conservative frameworks.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 92
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 85
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 78
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 68
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 62
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 55
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 45
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 42
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 33
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 27
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 10
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 1
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.2%
Operating Margin
-2.2%
Net Margin
-2.6%
EBITDA Margin
5.3%
ROE
-12.3%
ROA
-3.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$0.06
Cash
$4.91M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
0.81
Debt/Equity
—
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 19.4.2024 | $0.320 |
| 18.4.2024 | $0.320 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$3.14
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$5.54
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+76.4%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
22.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 22.0% | $8.72M | $8.00M |
| 2 | 17.2% | $10.22M | $8.60M |
| 3 | 12.3% | $11.47M | $8.86M |
| 4 | 7.4% | $12.32M | $8.73M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $12.63M | $8.21M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$7.15M
Terminal Value
$199.11M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$129.41M
Enterprise Value
$171.80M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$171.80M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$0.51
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$0.50
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 5 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 10 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
Zacks · 24.8.2026
Associated Press · 13.8.2026
PR Newswire · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
Zacks · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 21.7.2026
Zacks · 20.7.2026
Dawson Geophysical Company (DWSN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 45/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
DWSN currently scores 45/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, DWSN's estimated fair value is $5.54, which is 76.4% above the current price of $3.14. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
DWSN's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $5.54 vs. price $3.14 (+76.4%); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 53.8%; Free cash flow growth: 291.5%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin: -2.2% (negative); Net margin: -2.6% (negative); ATR: 9.4% of price.
Yes — DWSN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 150 | +150 | — |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 30.6.2026 | 108,650 | +150 | — |
| Wilks Farris | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 15,547,010 | -15,547,010 | — |
| Wilks Farris | Other Transaction | 31.12.2025 | 0 | -15,547,010 | — |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.10.2025 | 100,000 | +100,000 | — |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.10.2025 | 150,000 | +150,000 | — |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.10.2025 | 108,500 | +100,000 | — |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 27.10.2025 | 151,850 | +150,000 | — |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2025 | 550 | +550 | $1.59 |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 9.9.2025 | 1,850 | +550 | $1.59 |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | $1.40 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2025 | 1,050 | +1,050 | $1.40 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $1.38 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2025 | 1,000 | +1,000 | $1.39 |
| Shaw Ian M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 18.8.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $1.35 |
| Shaw Ian M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2025 | 5,000 | +5,000 | $1.28 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | $1.29 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.8.2025 | 500 | +500 | $1.28 |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 13.6.2025 | 50 | +50 | $1.36 |
| Clark William Anthony | Grant/Award from Employer | 6.6.2025 | 600 | +600 | $1.31 |
| Shaw Ian M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2025 | 3,500 | +3,500 | $1.32 |
| Krylov Sergei | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2025 | 3,055 | +3,055 | $1.33 |
| Mays Ray L | Grant/Award from Employer | 20.5.2025 | 2,950 | +2,950 | $1.33 |
| Shaw Ian M. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2025 | 3,645 | +3,645 | $1.28 |
| Krylov Sergei | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2025 | 2,640 | +2,640 | $1.27 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
261,545 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 341,705 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
31.6% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 39.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology