Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · Tel Aviv
7.48 ₪
▼ 0.38 ₪ (-4.9%)
Market data updated: 10/08 01:47 AM
News analyzed: 10/08/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
7.44 ₪ - 7.63 ₪
52-Week Range
6.55 ₪ - 10.82 ₪
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
Support
7.53 ₪
Resistance
8.98 ₪
THE BOTTOM LINE · IN ONE SECOND
Mixed
2 of 6 sources for, 2 against
If right
+6.5%
to the target
If wrong
-1.0%
to the stop
Possible gain is 6.5x the possible loss
🏛️ Legendary investors
4 of 10 would buy
🧠 Crowd mood: Anchoring
All the data behind it — below ↓
Not enough similar moments in this stock's history for reliable percentages — so no odds are shown.
🎯 Near target
₪7.96+6.5%
🛡️ Support
₪7.49+0.2%
🛑 Stop
₪7.41-1.0%
💎 Fair value (DCF)
—
⚖️ The jury
6 independent data sources from the site — each one votes
🏛️ Legendary investors who would buy:Charles Mackay · Samuel Armstrong Nelson · Howard Marks (Market Cycle) · Howard Marks
🚫 who would pass:Morgan Housel · Edgar Lawrence Smith · Jesse Livermore
For
Against
The percentages are real frequencies: how many similar past moments were up or down a month later. Every jury vote is computed from the site's own data, no AI. Not a promise and not investment advice.
-12.0% (1Y)
Computed automatically from real price data (swing highs/lows, volume flow) as of 2026-10-06. The lines are also drawn on the chart above. Not investment advice.
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 1/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Relative strength vs. S&P 500
+7.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 0 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 0
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
33
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
23
Risk
50
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 13/100
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 100
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 76
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 75
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 51
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Not enough growth/insider data for a real Veblen read
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 49
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 41
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 39
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 13
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 239 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
7.53 ₪
Range Bottom
8.98 ₪
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for Discount Investment Corporation Ltd. (DISI.TA) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DISI.TA specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DISI.TA's technical score is 23/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: +7.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for DISI.TA.
As of 2026-10-06, at a price of ₪7.63, the nearest support is ₪7.49, the nearest resistance is ₪7.96, a stop below support sits at ₪7.41. The levels come from the stock's real swing highs and lows over the last two years and are recomputed daily. Not investment advice.
Based on real trading volume (Chaikin Money Flow and weekly On-Balance Volume): money flowing out; over the longer term money has been flowing in for 12 months.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology
The investorScore of 33 places the stock in the WEAK rating category, reflecting a convergence of bearish technical signals despite a modest relative outperformance in the recent quarter. The technical sub‑score of 23, the lowest among the three pillars, is driven by multiple negative indicators: the price sits below both its 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, the MACD histogram is negative indicating falling momentum, the RSI is at 34.9 signaling a weak/negative bias, and the stochastic %K is at 10.3, suggesting an oversold condition. These factors collectively point to a downtrend and limited upside potential in the near term. By contrast, the news and risk categories each hold a neutral score of 50. The absence of any news‑related evidence means there are no fresh catalysts either supporting or detracting from the stock, while the risk metrics—an ATR of 2.8 % of price and a Calmar ratio of 0.78—signal moderate volatility and a historical drawdown that outweighs the three‑year annualized return. The sole strength noted is a +7.5 % price gain over the last three months relative to the index, indicating the stock has managed to outperform its benchmark despite the technical headwinds. However, this isolated momentum is insufficient to offset the broader technical weakness, resulting in the overall low investorScore and weak rating.
Technical indicators are largely negative: price below key moving averages, negative MACD histogram, low RSI, and oversold stochastic %K.
These metrics suggest ongoing downward momentum and limited short‑term upside.
No news evidence was identified, yielding a neutral score of 50.
Without news catalysts, price action is driven primarily by technical and risk factors.
Risk metrics show moderate volatility (ATR 2.8 % of price) and a Calmar ratio of 0.78, indicating past drawdowns exceed returns.
Higher risk and drawdown potential can deter risk‑averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
The stock’s weak rating stems from pronounced technical weakness and moderate risk, which outweigh its modest recent outperformance versus the index. With neutral news and no clear upside catalysts, the current score reflects a cautious outlook pending any improvement in price trends or risk profile.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
14
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
74
Fundamentals
—
Technical
23
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+11%
Market Narrative
39
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-11
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.