Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$76.82
▼ $0.77 (-1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/16 08:53 PM
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
Not available
Day Range
$76.48 - $77.62
52-Week Range
$66.93 - $80.58
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+14.8% (1Y)
⚠️ Insufficient data for a reliable StockIQ Score
Only 3 of 7 categories available — Fundamental, Growth, Valuation, Quality unavailable.
Strengths: 3/13 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 0.8% of price
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
The DGRO stock currently carries an investor score of 63 with a MODERATE rating, reflecting a balanced mix of supportive and cautionary factors. In the technical arena, the price trades above both the 50‑day and 200‑day moving averages, which underpins a bullish longer‑term bias, yet the MACD histogram remains negative and the price is below the SAR point, hinting at short‑term downtrend pressure. RSI at 50.9 and %K at 20.5 sit in neutral to mildly positive territory, while recent price action shows a 2.8% gain over the past three months relative to the index. News sentiment is exceptionally strong, scoring 92, driven by multiple neutral and positive articles that discuss dividend‑income strategies, alternative ETF choices for 401(k) investors, and a possible value‑small‑cap revival. Risk metrics are modest: an ATR of 0.7% indicates low volatility, and the Calmar ratio of 1.02 suggests that the 3‑year annualized return of 15.3% is roughly balanced against a maximum drawdown of 15.0%. Despite the favorable news backdrop, the mixed technical picture and negative momentum indicators temper enthusiasm. Concerns such as the negative MACD, price below SAR, recent negative ROC and CMF values, and the stock’s placement in the lower third of the Bollinger Bands highlight potential downside risk. Overall, the moderate score arises from strong news support and solid fundamentals offset by technical weakness and modest risk metrics.
Technical indicators show mixed signals: price is above both the 50‑day and 200‑day averages, indicating a bullish trend, while the MACD histogram is negative and the price sits below the SAR point, suggesting short‑term downtrend momentum. RSI at 50.9 and %K at 20.5 sit in neutral to slightly positive ranges.
These mixed signals explain the moderate technical score of 53 and highlight the need to monitor momentum versus trend.
News sentiment is overwhelmingly positive, with multiple neutral and positive articles highlighting dividend‑income strategies, favorable ETF selections, and a potential value‑small‑cap recovery. The aggregated news score of 92 reflects strong market perception.
Positive news elevates the overall investor score despite technical concerns.
Risk metrics are balanced: ATR at 0.7% shows modest volatility, and a Calmar ratio of 1.02 indicates that the 3‑year annualized return of 15.3% is roughly matched by a maximum drawdown of 15.0%.
These risk levels support a moderate risk rating and contribute to the overall risk score of 58.
StockIQ conclusion
In summary, DGRO’s MODERATE rating reflects a stock that benefits from robust news coverage and solid long‑term trend characteristics, yet faces short‑term technical headwinds. The price’s position above key moving averages and recent outperformance provide a foundation of strength, while negative momentum signals and elevated risk indicators keep the overall outlook guarded. Investors should weigh the positive sentiment and modest volatility against the current downtrend warnings before making decisions.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
48
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
No data available
Quality
No data available
Value
No data available
Momentum
33
Risk
58
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
No data available
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of the **iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO)** highlights its role as a strong dividend-focused investment option, particularly for long-term income strategies. Articles emphasize its **outperformance in risk-adjusted returns** compared to peers like SCHD, VIG, and VYM, positioning it as a reliable choice for retirees and income-focused investors. While not directly named in all pieces, DGRO is often referenced alongside other dividend ETFs in discussions about **dividend growth strategies, tax efficiency, and portfolio diversification** for financial stability. The focus remains on its **steady yield and resilience** amid market shifts.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF. News trend score: 80. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 2 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
13
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
68
Fundamentals
—
Technical
33
Valuation
—
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+4
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for DGRO strongly suggests traders are fixating on the 1.8% resistance gap, with anchoring dominating at 63. While sentiment remains positive (92/100) and volume is elevated, the lack of momentum (-1.1% ROC) and neutral RSI (51) imply hesitation rather than euphoria. The narrative gap (10 points) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations and muted technical strength. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will the stock consolidate near this psychological level?
Updated: 09/07/2026, 11:42 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
""Replacing a Social Security check with dividend income sounds straightforward until you realize the yield you chase determines whether your portfolio lasts or quietly self-destructs over a 20-year retirement.""
""DGRO maintains a strong long-term track record, outperforming most peers on risk-adjusted returns since inception.""
""The IRS taxes your Social Security check, then Medicare takes $202.90 from what’s left. These 4 ETFs pay you back.""
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 42/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Morgan Housel's documented principles, the model estimates the stock is a quiet compounder that could suit a patient holder, reflected by his top score. Samuel Nelson's cycle‑position view and the moderate scores from Mackay and Loeb also suggest a favorable position, though they stop short of a strong endorsement. Howard Marks and the efficient‑market view provide mixed signals, noting good business fundamentals but possibly high expectations and limited evidence versus an index. Conversely, Jesse Livermore’s trend‑following rule yields a negative assessment, Jack Schwager finds no clear edge, and several classic value and growth investors cannot form a read due to missing data, resulting in neutral 50‑point placeholders.
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 95
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 74
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 74
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 57
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 54
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 54
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 42
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
A trading range after an advance, but still without clear (volume-based) confirmation of a distribution phase.
Low confidence
$76.34
Range Bottom
$80.58
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 15.6.2026 | $0.331 |
| 17.3.2026 | $0.331 |
| 16.12.2025 | $0.447 |
| 16.9.2025 | $0.369 |
| 16.6.2025 | $0.324 |
| 18.3.2025 | $0.311 |
| 17.12.2024 | $0.378 |
| 25.9.2024 | $0.403 |
| 11.6.2024 | $0.293 |
| 21.3.2024 | $0.311 |
| 20.12.2023 | $0.370 |
| 26.9.2023 | $0.388 |
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 11 neutral, 2 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 14.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
etf.com · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
StockIQ doesn't currently have enough real data to compute a reliable score for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) — only 3 of 7 categories are available right now. Rather than show a misleading number, this page shows which data is missing instead.
StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — and for DGRO specifically, there currently isn't enough real data (only 3 of 7 categories available) to state even a factual score reliably. Check back once more data is available.
DGRO's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 0.8% of price; Price is above the 200-day average; +1.5% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; Price is below the SAR point — downtrend.
Yes — DGRO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,018,580 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,016,114 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 66.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology