Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Utilities · ·
$20.34
▼ $0.00 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/23 06:50 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/23/2026
News analyzed: 09/23/2026
Market Cap
$2.05B
Day Range
$19.72 - $20.42
52-Week Range
$19.03 - $42.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
03.11.2026
Support
$19.03
Resistance
$28.64
CTRI is a stock from the Utilities sector — Electricity, water, and residential gas — steady demand and heavy regulation, considered a defensive, dividend-paying sector.
-4.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 9/31 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 412.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: -$8.22 vs. price $20.34 (-140.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (65/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
Not enough data yet to generate this synthesis.
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
65
Quality
58
Value
33
Momentum
38
Risk
48
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
42
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Centuri Holdings, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 8 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
15
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
41
Psychology
50
Fundamentals
42
Technical
38
Valuation
33
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-36%
Market Narrative
55
Fundamental Reality
41
Narrative Gap
+14
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Jack Schwager — 87/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 11/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on each investor's documented principles, the model estimates that the stock is viewed very favorably by crowd‑mania‑averse and early‑cycle analysts such as Charles Mackay, Howard Marks (cycle), Samuel Nelson, Peter Lynch and Jack Schwager, whose scores range from 85 to 100 and highlight a lack of hype, an early‑to‑mid cycle position and untapped growth. More moderate scores from Howard Marks (risk‑priced), Thorstein Veblen, and Walter Bagehot (liquidity) reflect reasonable risk and value‑aligned growth but not exceptional appeal. In contrast, value‑oriented thinkers like Benjamin Graham, Philip Fisher, Gerald Loeb, Edgar Smith and Jesse Livermore assign low scores (30‑49), citing insufficient defensive margins, missing quality‑growth signatures and unclear trends. Finally, the efficient‑market view of Malkiel & Bogle and Morgan Housel’s volatility emphasis pull the overall assessment down, indicating limited evidence for out‑performance and a volatility profile that could deter patient holders.
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 87
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 85
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 82
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 81
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟢 65
Growth appears aligned with real value creation
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 57
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 49
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 44
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 40
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 35
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 30
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 11
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (3 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
8.3%
Operating Margin
3.1%
Net Margin
0.8%
EBITDA Margin
3.1%
ROE
2.6%
ROA
0.9%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.25
Cash
$126.63M
Total Debt
$737.62M
Current Ratio
1.78
Debt/Equity
0.84
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.34
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
-$8.22
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-140.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
3.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3.0% | $-8.45M | $-7.75M |
| 2 | 2.9% | $-8.70M | $-7.32M |
| 3 | 2.8% | $-8.94M | $-6.90M |
| 4 | 2.6% | $-9.17M | $-6.50M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $-9.40M | $-6.11M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$-8.20M
Terminal Value
$-148.28M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$-96.37M
Enterprise Value
$-130.96M
Net Debt
$610.99M
Equity Value
$-741.95M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$9.67
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.48
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 8 positive, 9 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 19.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
PR Newswire · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 8.9.2026
MT Newswires · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Fintel · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 19.8.2026
MT Newswires · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.8.2026
Benzinga · 17.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
CFO Dive · 13.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
Centuri Holdings, Inc. (CTRI) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CTRI currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CTRI's estimated fair value is -$8.22, which is 140.4% below the current price of $20.34. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CTRI's technical score is 38/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 412.5%; Net income growth: 433.1%; Operating margin is stable or improving over time.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: -$8.22 vs. price $20.34 (-140.4%); Calmar: -0.12 (3y annualized return -6.4% / max drawdown 54.4%); Free cash flow growth: -113.9%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CTRI.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hunter Danielle E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 16,967 | +16,967 | — |
| Hunter Danielle E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 8,837 | +8,837 | — |
| Youngblood Kelly | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 72,864 | +72,864 | — |
| Youngblood Kelly | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 72,864 | +72,864 | — |
| Hunter Danielle E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 16,967 | +16,967 | — |
| Hunter Danielle E. | Grant/Award from Employer | 12.8.2026 | 25,804 | +8,837 | — |
| Haller Karen S | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| Patton Charles R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| Dill Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| NIELSEN STEVEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 5,290 | +5,290 | — |
| MARIUCCI ANNE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| Evans Andrew W | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| Krummel Christopher A | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 4,067 | +4,067 | — |
| DeMaria Dustin | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 7,736 | +7,736 | — |
| NIELSEN STEVEN E | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 5,290 | +5,290 | — |
| MARIUCCI ANNE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 89,709 | +4,067 | — |
| Evans Andrew W | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 18,309 | +4,067 | — |
| Dill Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 24,309 | +4,067 | — |
| Krummel Christopher A | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 20,809 | +4,067 | — |
| Haller Karen S | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 30,309 | +4,067 | — |
| Patton Charles R. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.5.2026 | 29,309 | +4,067 | — |
| Patton Charles R. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 7,338 | -7,338 | — |
| Krummel Christopher A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 7,338 | -7,338 | — |
| Dill Julie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 7,338 | -7,338 | — |
| Dill Julie | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 18.5.2026 | 7,338 | +7,338 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
3,909,593 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 3,528,154 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
32.0% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 41.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology