Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Industrials · ·
$11.17
▲ $0.33 (+3.0%)
Market data updated: 09/21 04:43 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$126.03M
Day Range
$10.87 - $11.20
52-Week Range
$7.80 - $17.28
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.01.2027
Support
$9.57
Resistance
$11.25
CODA is a stock from the Industrials sector — Manufacturing, aerospace, defense, and infrastructure — closely tied to capital-investment cycles and economic growth.
+31.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 18/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 429.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $2.49 vs. price $11.17 (-77.7%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (70/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
67
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
today · $10.84
Evidence: FOMO score jumped from 13 to 59 day-over-day
What happened after
Still awaiting outcome
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
70
Quality
47
Value
38
Momentum
77
Risk
54
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
70
Institutional
11
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Everyone's writing about Coda Octopus Group, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 17 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
52
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
37
Psychology
59
Fundamentals
70
Technical
77
Valuation
38
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+8%
Market Narrative
86
Fundamental Reality
37
Narrative Gap
+49
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 Market Brain events driving this
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 12/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark contrast in verdicts for CODA reflects deep methodological divides between investors prioritizing stability and those focused on speculative or cyclical signals. Walter Bagehot’s near-perfect score highlights liquidity and resilience in a credit crisis—a rare strength in his framework—while Jesse Livermore’s low score underscores a clear downtrend, violating his iron rule of trading *with* momentum. Meanwhile, the middle-ground investors like Fisher, Loeb, and Marks flag moderate risks or valuation concerns, suggesting the stock lacks the exceptional quality or defensive moat that would justify aggressive bets. The efficient-market camp and Schwager’s disciplined wizards dismiss it outright, seeing no clear edge or setup, whereas Mackay and Nelson’s cautious excitement hints at speculative bubbles or mid-cycle hype. The divide between Graham’s strict defensive criteria and Fisher’s broader quality assessment further exposes whether CODA is a speculative play or a fundamentally flawed bet.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 64
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 61
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 49
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 48
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 44
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 40
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 38
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 36
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 36
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 31
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 29
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 12
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 282 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 1 bearish · 3 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
66.5%
Operating Margin
17.1%
Net Margin
15.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
7.1%
ROA
6.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.33
Cash
$22.48M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
8.86
Debt/Equity
0.00
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$11.17
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$2.49
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-77.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-1.3%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -1.3% | $1.92M | $1.77M |
| 2 | -0.3% | $1.92M | $1.61M |
| 3 | 0.6% | $1.93M | $1.49M |
| 4 | 1.6% | $1.96M | $1.39M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $2.01M | $1.31M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$1.95M
Terminal Value
$31.69M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$20.60M
Enterprise Value
$28.17M
Net Debt
$0
Equity Value
$28.17M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$5.16
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$4.87
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 17 positive, 2 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
ChartMill · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 24.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 24.8.2026
Benzinga · 29.7.2026
ChartMill · 28.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.6.2026
Moby · 16.6.2026
GuruFocus.com · 15.6.2026
MarketBeat · 15.6.2026
Coda Octopus Group, Inc. (CODA) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 67/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CODA currently scores 67/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, CODA's estimated fair value is $2.49, which is 77.7% below the current price of $11.17. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
CODA's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 429.8%; Debt/equity: 0.00; Current ratio: 8.86.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $2.49 vs. price $11.17 (-77.7%); Operating margin is eroding over time; Calmar: 0.48 (3y annualized return 21.7% / max drawdown 44.9%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CODA.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 2 purchases and 17 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HAMILTON MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 1,102 | +1,102 | — |
| HAMILTON MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.5.2026 | 6,635 | +1,102 | — |
| Jardine Gayle Michelle | Open Market Sale | 19.3.2026 | 2,256 | -2,256 | $12.59 |
| Jardine Gayle Michelle | Open Market Sale | 19.3.2026 | 2,500 | -2,256 | $12.59 |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $14.45 |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $14.45 |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $14.45 |
| Emerson John Steven | Gift | 11.3.2026 | 100,000 | -100,000 | — |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 79,254 | -79,254 | $14.99 |
| Emerson John Steven | Gift | 11.3.2026 | 113,250 | -100,000 | — |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 33,996 | -79,254 | $14.99 |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 309,928 | -1,000 | $14.45 |
| Emerson John Steven | Open Market Sale | 11.3.2026 | 5,286 | -3,000 | $14.45 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 2.10.2025 | 150,000 | -150,000 | $8.15 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 2.10.2025 | 2,045,211 | -150,000 | $8.15 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 23.9.2025 | 7,013 | -7,013 | $8.13 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 23.9.2025 | 2,195,211 | -7,013 | $8.13 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 22.9.2025 | 16,995 | -16,995 | $8.20 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 22.9.2025 | 2,202,224 | -16,995 | $8.20 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 19.9.2025 | 32,362 | -32,362 | $8.23 |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Sale | 19.9.2025 | 2,219,219 | -32,362 | $8.23 |
| HAMILTON MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.3.2025 | 2,266 | +2,266 | — |
| Sondergaard Niels | Open Market Purchase | 24.1.2025 | 10,000 | +10,000 | — |
| HAMILTON MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 8.8.2024 | 2,508 | +2,508 | — |
| Gayle Annmarie | Open Market Purchase | 6.10.2023 | 16,500 | +16,500 | $5.99 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
180,781 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 216,082 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
52.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology