Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$2.53
▼ $0.18 (-6.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 11:40 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$7.46M
Day Range
$2.45 - $2.93
52-Week Range
⚠️ Data anomaly
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
CMCT is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-99.7% (1Y)
Strengths: 2/24 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 84.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Net margin
Net margin: -33.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
35
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
46
Quality
50
Value
55
Momentum
6
Risk
28
Sentiment
62
Fundamental
30
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Creative Media & Community Trust (CMCT)** has centered on its **Q2 2026 earnings performance**, where the company reported a **larger-than-expected loss per share ($4.03 vs. $3.11 estimated)** despite beating revenue forecasts ($29.68M vs. $28.1M). Analysts discussed its stock volatility, with warnings about high RSI values and mixed investor sentiment. Additionally, CMCT received a **rating upgrade to "Buy"** from a financial firm, though broader real estate sector concerns were also highlighted. Earnings call transcripts and earnings snapshots dominated reporting.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Creative Media. News trend score: 62. Reason: 5 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
38
Psychology
82
Fundamentals
30
Technical
6
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-29%
Market Narrative
37
Fundamental Reality
38
Narrative Gap
-1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CMCT is dominated by **panic selling**, evidenced by extreme price weakness (-8.9% today) and oversold conditions (RSI 33). The narrative gap (-3) hints at a slight disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals, but the dominant state reflects a defensive, risk-off posture. Key open question: *Is this a corrective pullback or the start of a deeper correction?* The lack of herding or FOMO signals further supports a cautious, distressed selling environment. Volatility remains subdued (0.91x ATR), which may indicate hesitation rather than panic exhaustion.
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:21 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"reported quarterly losses of $(4.03) per share which missed the analyst consensus estimate of $(3.11) by 29.58%"
"Creative Media (NASDAQ:CMCT) held its second-quarter earnings conference call on Friday. Below is the complete transcript from the call"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 98/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock splits the historical methodologies into two starkly opposing camps: the bullish camp, which sees strong technical or cyclical tailwinds, and the bearish camp, which flags fundamental flaws or overvaluation. On one side, Benjamin Graham’s *Enterprising Investor* and Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology model both give near-perfect scores, suggesting either a rare valuation opportunity or a lack of speculative frenzy—though Graham’s lack of data leaves his verdict tentative. Samuel Nelson and Howard Marks (cycle-focused) also lean positive, with Nelson seeing it as oversold and Marks viewing it as early-cycle, while Jack Schwager’s disciplined trading approach sees a favorable risk/reward setup. Conversely, the bearish methodologies—led by Philip Fisher (who scores zero for lacking his signature growth/quality traits) and Jesse Livermore (who flags a negative trend)—paint a picture of overpriced risk or a stock primed for volatility. Even Peter Lynch and Howard Marks (generalist) are mixed, implying the stock’s growth may already be baked into its price, while the most extreme warnings come from Loeb (capital preservation) and Housel (patient investor psychology), who see it as a high-risk or emotionally taxing hold.
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 98
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 95
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 94
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 67
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 57
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 52
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the stability Smith's long-term case requires
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 24
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 19
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 18
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 13
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 0
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 0
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 11 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
-33.4%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-14.7%
ROA
-4.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$67.08
Cash
$15.44M
Total Debt
$509.77M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
1.92
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 8.7.2024 | $208.333 |
| 7.7.2024 | $208.333 |
| 5.4.2024 | $208.333 |
| 4.4.2024 | $208.333 |
| 29.12.2023 | $208.333 |
| 28.12.2023 | $208.333 |
| 5.10.2023 | $208.333 |
| 4.10.2023 | $208.333 |
| 7.7.2023 | $208.333 |
| 6.7.2023 | $208.333 |
| 29.3.2023 | $208.333 |
| 28.3.2023 | $208.333 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$288.75
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$288.75
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 12 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Zacks · 3.9.2026
Benzinga · 18.8.2026
Motley Fool · 15.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 14.8.2026
Moby · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Associated Press · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 14.8.2026
Business Wire · 12.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
Zacks · 29.7.2026
Benzinga · 15.7.2026
Business Wire · 24.6.2026
TMX Newsfile · 1.6.2026
Insider Monkey · 13.5.2026
Moby · 8.5.2026
Motley Fool · 8.5.2026
Creative Media (CMCT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 35/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CMCT currently scores 35/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CMCT's technical score is 6/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 84.5%; NAV per share: $288.75.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net margin: -33.4% (negative); ATR: 16.6% of price; Calmar: -0.94 (3y annualized return -93.8% / max drawdown 100.0%).
Yes — CMCT has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wong Elaine Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,653 | +11,652 | — |
| Edwards Marcie L | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,654 | +11,652 | — |
| Bryant John Hope | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,653 | +11,652 | — |
| BECH DOUGLAS Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,653 | +11,652 | — |
| Edwards Marcie L | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,652 | +11,652 | — |
| Bryant John Hope | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,652 | +11,652 | — |
| Wong Elaine Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,652 | +11,652 | — |
| BECH DOUGLAS Y | Grant/Award from Employer | 11.8.2026 | 11,652 | +11,652 | — |
| Wong Elaine Y | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 86 | -86 | — |
| Bryant John Hope | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 86 | -86 | — |
| Edwards Marcie L | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 86 | -86 | — |
| BECH DOUGLAS Y | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 86 | -86 | — |
| BECH DOUGLAS Y | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 1 | -86 | — |
| Bryant John Hope | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 1 | -86 | — |
| Wong Elaine Y | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 1 | -86 | — |
| Edwards Marcie L | Disposition to the Company | 22.6.2026 | 2 | -86 | — |
| Kuba Shaul | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 36,663 | -36,663 | — |
| RESSLER RICHARD S | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 36,663 | -36,663 | — |
| Shemesh Avraham | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 1,002,524 | +1,002,524 | — |
| Shemesh Avraham | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 298,472 | -298,472 | — |
| Kuba Shaul | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 298,472 | -298,472 | — |
| Kuba Shaul | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 8,146,382 | +8,146,382 | — |
| Kuba Shaul | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 1,002,524 | +1,002,524 | — |
| Shemesh Avraham | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 8,146,382 | +8,146,382 | — |
| Shemesh Avraham | Other Transaction | 16.3.2026 | 36,663 | -36,663 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
44,240 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 55,127 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
36.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 30.9% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology