Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$3.17
▲ $0.03 (+1.0%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:25 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$75.45M
Day Range
$3.00 - $3.23
52-Week Range
$2.80 - $5.80
Beta
—
Next Earnings
10.11.2026
Support
$2.80
Resistance
$3.94
CINT is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
-47.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/27 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.4%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Daily volatility (ATR)
ATR: 6.5% of price
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
22
Risk
40
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
65
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of CI&T Inc. (CINT) has centered on its strong Q2 2026 financial performance, highlighting **$142.8 million in revenue** with **21.9% organic growth**, driven by AI-focused verticals. The company also announced **CI&T Business Builders**, a new unit aimed at helping businesses adapt to AI-driven challenges, alongside its "Agentic Enterprise Reinvention" offering. Analysts from UBS, TD Cowen, and JP Morgan maintained **Buy/Overweight ratings** but lowered price targets, reflecting cautious optimism amid market adjustments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about CI&T Inc Class A Common. News trend score: 68. Reason: 7 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 4 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
24
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
52
Psychology
71
Fundamentals
65
Technical
22
Valuation
55
A significant decline over time, but on unusually low trading volume — holders unwilling to accept the loss.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
-19%
Market Narrative
40
Fundamental Reality
52
Narrative Gap
-12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for CINT shows no dominant psychological state, with FOMO and Panic Selling tied for highest scores but still below neutral. Elevated volume (1.29x) and negative momentum (-2.7% ROC) suggest cautious trading activity, while neutral RSI (54) and moderate sentiment (68/100) indicate balanced sentiment. The lack of extreme states (e.g., Euphoria, Overconfidence) suggests a pragmatic, risk-aware environment. The key question is whether the elevated volume reflects speculative positioning or defensive hedging, given the recent underperformance (-9.6% 3-month change).
Updated: 09/06/2026, 04:40 PM
👥 What the crowd believes
"Revenue hit $142.8M with 21.9% organic growth as AI-focused verticals accelerated."
"CI&T announces the creation of CI&T Business Builders, a new unit dedicated to helping companies address AI-driven challenges."
"TD Cowen maintains CI&T with a Buy and lowers the price target from $6 to $5."
"CI&T Inc (CINT) (Q2 2026) Earnings Call Highlights: Record Revenue and Strategic AI..."
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 10/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-oriented methodologies. Peter Lynch’s near-perfect score suggests it’s a high-growth candidate where the price hasn’t yet reflected its potential, aligning with his emphasis on early-stage companies with explosive upside. Meanwhile, Benjamin Graham’s defensive investor approach finds it attractive but not a deep bargain, while his enterprising counterpart dismisses it as lacking the extreme undervaluation he seeks. The middle ground is fractured: Howard Marks sees a strong business but warns of inflated expectations, while Samuel Nelson and Veblen remain neutral, unsure if growth will translate into sustainable profits. On the other end, efficiency-market skeptics like Loeb and Housel flag volatility and risk, while trend-followers like Livermore and Schwager outright reject it, seeing no momentum or setup to justify entry. Fisher’s low score underscores a lack of fundamental depth, leaving the stock as a polarizing play—either a Lynch-style growth bet or a minefield for those prioritizing safety or trend discipline.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 99
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 96
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 91
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 89
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 76
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 54
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 52
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 51
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 51
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 42
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 36
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 35
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 17
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 10
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 8 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
32.0%
Operating Margin
13.4%
Net Margin
8.3%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.2%
ROA
7.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.31
Cash
$47.86M
Total Debt
$122.63M
Current Ratio
1.33
Debt/Equity
0.42
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$2.30
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$1.92
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 7 positive, 9 neutral, 4 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Yahoo · 19.8.2026
Motley Fool · 19.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Business Wire · 17.8.2026
MT Newswires · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 12.8.2026
Moby · 12.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
MT Newswires · 11.8.2026
CI&T Inc Class A Common (CINT) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
CINT currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
CINT's technical score is 22/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 36.4%; Net income growth: 37.7%; Debt/equity: 0.42.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: ATR: 6.5% of price; Calmar: -0.37 (3y annualized return -22.6% / max drawdown 61.0%); Price is below the 50-day average.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for CINT.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santana Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,040 | -8,040 | — |
| MEIRA SILVIO ROMERO DE LEMOS | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 5,360 | -5,360 | — |
| Rodrigues Stanley | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 33,718 | -33,718 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,040 | -8,040 | — |
| Rodrigues Stanley | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 67,436 | -67,436 | — |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.6.2026 | 8,040 | -8,040 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 2,781 | -2,781 | — |
| Santana Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 4,166 | +4,166 | — |
| Santana Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 4,166 | -4,166 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 765 | -765 | $4.25 |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 4,166 | -4,166 | — |
| MEIRA SILVIO ROMERO DE LEMOS | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 764 | -764 | $4.25 |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 1,146 | -1,146 | $4.25 |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 4,166 | +4,166 | — |
| Santana Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 1,146 | -1,146 | $4.25 |
| MEIRA SILVIO ROMERO DE LEMOS | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 2,778 | +2,778 | — |
| MEIRA SILVIO ROMERO DE LEMOS | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 2,778 | -2,778 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 2,781 | +2,781 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 13,500 | +2,781 | — |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 12,735 | -765 | $4.25 |
| Trematore Carla Alessandra | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 0 | -2,781 | — |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 4,816 | +4,166 | — |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.5.2026 | 3,670 | -1,146 | $4.25 |
| gouveia eduardo campozana | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 0 | -4,166 | — |
| Santana Maria Helena dos Santos Fernandes de | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.5.2026 | 19,974 | +4,166 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
46,602 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 165,943 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 47.7% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology