Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Technology · ·
$34.66
▼ $0.14 (-0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/17 03:32 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$4.76B
Day Range
$34.13 - $35.19
52-Week Range
$21.34 - $36.34
Beta
—
Next Earnings
30.11.2026
BOX is a stock from the Technology sector — Software, hardware, chip, and computing-services companies — revenue tied to the pace of innovation and upgrade cycles.
+6.6% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $39.53 vs. price $34.66 (+14.0%)
Fair Value
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 11.6% / max drawdown 44.6%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
60
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
42
Quality
63
Value
57
Momentum
60
Risk
48
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
57
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Box, Inc. has centered on its strong Q2 2027 financial performance, with revenue growing 9% to $321.1 million and net income rising to $19.22 million. The company’s updated guidance for 2026—forecasting $1.29 billion in revenue and a 9.5% GAAP operating margin—reflects accelerating demand for its **Enterprise Advanced** tier and AI-driven content workflows. Analysts highlight Box’s shift toward positioning itself as a **security layer for AI**, enabling monetization of AI usage across enterprise platforms, while stock analysts raised price targets amid optimism.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Box, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
38
Fundamentals
57
Technical
60
Valuation
57
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+40%
Market Narrative
54
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+12
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market’s dominant euphoria suggests investors are prioritizing recent momentum and positive sentiment over valuation metrics, as evidenced by the 25.2% premium to the 200-day average and extreme news sentiment. The disconnect between price performance and fundamental growth (3.8% vs. -0.6% EPS) hints at overconfidence, though it remains secondary. The key question is whether this narrative gap—where optimism (59) far exceeds reality (42)—will sustain momentum or trigger a re-evaluation. The absence of panic or herding implies confidence is broad but fragile to external shocks.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 10:21 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Management highlighted record adoption of its Enterprise Advanced offering and growing demand for AI-driven content workflows"
"customers piled into the company’s priciest tier, Enterprise Advanced"
"revenue grew 9% to $321.1 million as customers piled into... beating management’s own guidance"
"Box is repositioning itself as the security layer that lets AI"
📈 5D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 59/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BOX reflects deep contrasts in how these methodologies evaluate stocks. Jesse Livermore’s high score and positive trend verdict suggest he’d see this stock as part of a clear upward momentum pattern, while the majority—including Smith, Housel, and Marks—cautiously flag it as moderate or mixed, signaling potential but not overwhelming conviction. Fisher, Lynch, and Graham’s low scores reveal a consensus that BOX lacks the fundamental quality, growth, or valuation edge they demand, treating it as either too speculative or overpriced. Meanwhile, Veblen’s low score and Graham’s Enterprising Investor verdict imply concerns about speculative excess or valuation, contrasting sharply with Livermore’s technical optimism. The middle-ground scores from Bagehot and Nelson suggest neutral liquidity or market positioning, leaving little consensus beyond cautious interest.
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 59
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 57
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 55
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 53
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 53
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 53
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 51
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 50
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 45
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 40
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 40
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 40
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 37
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 21
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 16
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 40%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 278 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (5 bullish · 4 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
79.2%
Operating Margin
7.1%
Net Margin
9.8%
EBITDA Margin
9.9%
ROE
-38.6%
ROA
7.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.60
Cash
$375.13M
Total Debt
$451.01M
Current Ratio
1.11
Debt/Equity
-1.51
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$34.66
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$39.53
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
+14.0%
🟢 Appears cheap relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
5.9%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 5.9% | $371.13M | $340.49M |
| 2 | 5.1% | $389.94M | $328.20M |
| 3 | 4.2% | $406.36M | $313.78M |
| 4 | 3.4% | $420.00M | $297.54M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $430.50M | $279.79M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$350.38M
Terminal Value
$6.79B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$4.41B
Enterprise Value
$5.97B
Net Debt
$75.88M
Equity Value
$5.90B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
-$2.01
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
-$3.19
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Motley Fool · 14.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
MT Newswires · 11.9.2026
Benzinga · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Business Wire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Benzinga · 10.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Benzinga · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 4.9.2026
StockStory · 4.9.2026
Benzinga · 4.9.2026
Yahoo · 3.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Box, Inc. (BOX) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 60/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BOX currently scores 60/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, BOX's estimated fair value is $39.53, which is 14.0% above the current price of $34.66. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
BOX's technical score is 60/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $39.53 vs. price $34.66 (+14.0%); Operating margin is stable or improving over time; Debt/equity: -1.51.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.26 (3y annualized return 11.6% / max drawdown 44.6%); Return on equity (ROE): -38.6% (negative); Earnings per share (EPS) growth: -57.4%.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BOX.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 14 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Berkovitch Eli | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 3,850 | -3,850 | $35.99 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 5,834 | -5,834 | $32.31 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Open Market Sale | 7.8.2026 | 513,382 | -5,834 | $32.31 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 5,834 | -5,834 | $30.13 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Open Market Sale | 21.7.2026 | 519,216 | -5,834 | $30.13 |
| Smith Dylan C | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 17,000 | -17,000 | $29.05 |
| Smith Dylan C | Open Market Sale | 10.7.2026 | 1,337,075 | -17,000 | $29.05 |
| Berkovitch Eli | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 1,800 | -1,800 | $28.95 |
| Berkovitch Eli | Open Market Sale | 8.7.2026 | 109,254 | -1,800 | $28.95 |
| Mayer Bethany | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2026 | 1,325 | -1,325 | $25.78 |
| Mayer Bethany | Open Market Sale | 26.6.2026 | 2,735 | -2,735 | $26.11 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Open Market Sale | 25.6.2026 | 5,834 | -5,834 | $24.97 |
| EVAN DANA L | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| LEVIN DANIEL J | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| Barsamian Sue | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| Mayer Bethany | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 12,266 | +12,266 | — |
| Murphy Stephen Francis | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| LAZAR JACK R | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| Walia Amit | Grant/Award from Employer | 25.6.2026 | 8,372 | +8,372 | — |
| Levie Aaron | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 15,000 | -15,000 | $24.32 |
| Levie Aaron | Open Market Sale | 22.6.2026 | 2,874,673 | -15,000 | $24.32 |
| Nottebohm Olivia | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.6.2026 | 21,327 | -21,327 | $24.84 |
| Smith Dylan C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.6.2026 | 9,974 | -9,974 | $24.84 |
| Berkovitch Eli | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.6.2026 | 111,054 | -1,925 | $24.84 |
| Smith Dylan C | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.6.2026 | 1,354,075 | -9,974 | $24.84 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
16,958,898 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 15,340,703 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
60.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.2% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology