Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$44.77
▲ $0.02 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 07:23 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$3.19B
Day Range
$44.19 - $44.81
52-Week Range
$35.10 - $52.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
15.10.2026
Support
$43.81
Resistance
$49.73
+17.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/24 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Leverage risk
Debt/equity: 0.10
Risk
Biggest negative driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is below the 50-day average
Technical
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
41
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
62
Quality
55
Value
55
Momentum
16
Risk
56
Sentiment
0
Fundamental
55
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of BankUnited, Inc. has primarily focused on its stock performance and executive activity, with a notable headline about an executive selling $164,000 worth of shares—part of a mandatory vesting sale—after the stock surged 29% over the past year. Analysts have also scrutinized its recent earnings trends, comparing its 1.6% decline since the last report to broader regional bank sector movements. Some sources suggest caution, highlighting potential small-cap challenges, while others briefly mention its position among Q2 regional bank performers. No substantive operational changes were detailed.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about BankUnited, Inc.. News trend score: 0. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
28
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
40
Psychology
58
Fundamentals
55
Technical
16
Valuation
55
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-6%
Market Narrative
22
Fundamental Reality
40
Narrative Gap
-18
🔀 Weak-Conviction Rally
Price is moving, but not accompanied by a matching rise in news attention/sentiment.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BKU suggests a dominant psychological state of **anchoring**, as traders appear fixated on the 3.7% support level. The narrative-reality gap (-16) further implies a disconnect between market perception and fundamentals, with low sentiment (0/100) and neutral momentum (RSI 45) reinforcing cautious positioning. While panic selling (21) and FOMO (2) are present, they are muted by lack of extreme volatility or euphoric indicators. The key question is whether traders will hold near support or break below it, given the absence of strong contrarian signals.
Updated: 09/08/2026, 03:55 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Wells Fargo analyst lowers BankUnited price target from $55 to $54"
"subscale operations make it harder to expand competitive moats"
"checking BankUnited’s progress compared to regional bank peers"
📈 9D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 99/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 25/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for BKU reflects deep contrasts between methodologies rooted in fundamental value, behavioral psychology, and market timing. Defensive investors like Benjamin Graham and Morgan Housel see strong potential—Graham’s model flags it as a defensive buy, while Housel’s patient compounder lens highlights its steady growth. Meanwhile, cycle-focused analysts like Samuel Nelson and Howard Marks (both cycle and general) agree it’s positioned favorably, though Marks’ lower score suggests a cautious mid-cycle stance. On the other end, traders like Jesse Livermore and Jack Schwager dismiss it outright—Livermore’s low score aligns with his trend-following rule, while Schwager’s neutrality hints at a lack of decisive edge. Even value purists like Philip Fisher and Graham’s enterprising bar downgrade it, finding it solid but not exceptional, while efficient-market skeptics like Malkiel/Bogle and Veblen question whether the stock’s growth justifies active selection over passive indexing.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 99
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 91
Attractive to a Defensive Graham Investor
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 86
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 79
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 79
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 77
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 74
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 73
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 63
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 62
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 60
Solid, but not the exceptional quality Fisher looked for
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 25
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 9 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
1234.8%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
8.8%
ROA
0.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
$3.55
Cash
$217.78M
Total Debt
$296.86M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.10
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 10.7.2026 | $0.330 |
| 9.7.2026 | $0.330 |
| 10.4.2026 | $0.330 |
| 9.4.2026 | $0.330 |
| 9.1.2026 | $0.310 |
| 8.1.2026 | $0.310 |
| 10.10.2025 | $0.310 |
| 9.10.2025 | $0.310 |
| 11.7.2025 | $0.310 |
| 10.7.2025 | $0.310 |
| 11.4.2025 | $0.310 |
| 10.4.2025 | $0.310 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$41.10
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$41.10
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 5 neutral, 12 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
StockStory · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 22.8.2026
Motley Fool · 22.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
Zacks · 21.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 17.8.2026
StockStory · 15.8.2026
Yahoo · 15.8.2026
StockStory · 12.8.2026
Yahoo · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
StockStory · 31.7.2026
Zacks · 27.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.7.2026
Simply Wall St. · 26.7.2026
BankUnited, Inc. (BKU) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 41/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BKU currently scores 41/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BKU's technical score is 16/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Debt/equity: 0.10; Net margin: 1234.8% — strong; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 14.6%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is below the 50-day average; Price is below the 200-day average; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
Yes — BKU has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 6 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mackey James G. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 8,937 | -8,937 | — |
| Mackey James G. | Tax Withholding in Shares | 20.8.2026 | 3,517 | -3,517 | $46.83 |
| Mackey James G. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 20.8.2026 | 8,937 | +8,937 | — |
| PAULS DOUGLAS J | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 3,000 | -3,000 | $47.90 |
| PAULS DOUGLAS J | Open Market Sale | 13.8.2026 | 42,472 | -3,000 | $47.90 |
| Richards Jay D. | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 4,000 | -4,000 | $48.67 |
| Richards Jay D. | Open Market Sale | 15.6.2026 | 40,502 | -4,000 | $48.67 |
| DiGiacomo John N. | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $45.97 |
| DiGiacomo John N. | Open Market Sale | 1.6.2026 | 15,027 | -1,000 | $45.97 |
| DOWLING MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| Smith-Baugh Germaine | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| Wines Lynne | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| SOBTI SANJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| Blanca Tere | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| DiGiacomo John N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| PAULS DOUGLAS J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 2,267 | +2,267 | — |
| Rubenstein William S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 1,511 | +1,511 | — |
| PAULS DOUGLAS J | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 45,472 | +2,267 | — |
| Wines Lynne | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 24,327 | +1,511 | — |
| DOWLING MICHAEL J. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 26,327 | +1,511 | — |
| SOBTI SANJIV | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 20,327 | +1,511 | — |
| Smith-Baugh Germaine | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 9,998 | +1,511 | — |
| Blanca Tere | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 26,327 | +1,511 | — |
| DiGiacomo John N. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 16,027 | +1,511 | — |
| Rubenstein William S. | Grant/Award from Employer | 21.5.2026 | 3,545 | +1,511 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
2,868,053 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 2,678,249 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
59.1% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 55.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology