Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· · NYSE
$41.32
▼ $1.54 (-3.6%)
Market data updated: 09/16 01:24 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/16/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$2.82B
Day Range
$40.64 - $41.92
52-Week Range
$31.49 - $68.74
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
-34.1% (1Y)
Strengths: 6/14 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 19.7% / max drawdown 53.3%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
Bitwise Bitcoin Industry ETF (BITB) exhibits a **moderate overall score of 57**, reflecting a strong technical performance but significant fundamental and growth concerns. The stock’s technicals are robust, with sustained momentum above key moving averages (50-day and 200-day) and a positive MACD histogram, though the RSI at 67.4 suggests overbought conditions that could signal a near-term pullback. However, the fundamental and growth metrics are deeply troubling: a **negative 121.7% net income growth** and a **ROA of -10.2%** underscore severe operational inefficiencies or losses, while the **Calmar ratio of 0.41** highlights extreme volatility relative to returns. Valuation remains neutral, but the **falling trading volume** despite price gains raises questions about speculative buying pressure. News sentiment is mixed, with Bitcoin’s price rally and macroeconomic factors like Fed policy easing providing tailwinds, though operational critiques and regulatory risks (e.g., IRS taxation concerns) introduce uncertainty. The high risk profile—exacerbated by a **53.3% max drawdown**—suggests this is a volatile, speculative play with limited intrinsic stability.
BITB shows strong technical strength with prices above both the 50-day and 200-day moving averages, a positive MACD histogram indicating rising momentum, and an RSI of 67.4 reflecting healthy positive momentum, though the %K at 88.7 signals overbought conditions.
Technical strength suggests short-term bullish momentum, but overbought conditions may indicate a near-term correction.
BITB’s return on assets (ROA) is severely negative at **-10.2%**, indicating fundamental operational challenges or losses.
Negative ROA raises concerns about the company’s ability to generate sustainable profitability or value for shareholders.
Net income growth is catastrophically negative at **-121.7%**, signaling severe contraction or losses in profitability.
Such extreme negative growth undermines confidence in long-term expansion or shareholder returns.
No explicit valuation metrics are provided, but the lack of positive growth or profitability suggests valuation is likely stretched relative to fundamentals.
Without clear valuation benchmarks, investors must rely on speculative or technical drivers rather than intrinsic value.
Bitcoin’s price surge to $80,000 and Fed policy comments have driven speculative demand, while operational critiques (e.g., IRS taxation concerns) and competitive ETF launches introduce mixed sentiment.
Macroeconomic tailwinds may support short-term gains, but operational and regulatory risks could dampen long-term appeal.
BITB exhibits extreme volatility, with a **Calmar ratio of 0.41** (3-year annualized return of 22.1% offset by a **53.3% max drawdown**) and an ATR of 2.9% of price.
Such volatility and drawdown risk make BITB a high-risk speculative asset, potentially unsuitable for risk-averse investors.
StockIQ conclusion
Bitwise Bitcoin Industry ETF (BITB) presents a **moderate-risk, speculative opportunity** driven by strong technical momentum and Bitcoin’s price rally, but its fundamentals are severely weakened by negative income growth and operational inefficiencies. The stock’s high volatility and extreme drawdown risk underscore its speculative nature, while macroeconomic factors and regulatory uncertainties introduce additional layers of risk. Investors should approach BITB with caution, recognizing that its value is largely tied to Bitcoin’s speculative performance rather than intrinsic stability or profitability.
Written automatically from the computed data shown on this page only — not investment advice.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
49
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
44
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
62
Risk
42
Sentiment
26
Fundamental
48
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Bitwise’s Bitcoin ETF (IBIT) has centered on its fee structure, which quietly reduces Bitcoin exposure daily and triggers taxable events for holders, drawing criticism for its hidden costs. The fund has gained attention alongside broader Bitcoin ETF inflows—including IBIT, FBTC, and ARKB—as crypto prices surged past $80,000, fueled by weaker dollar conditions and cautious Federal Reserve signals. Additionally, Bitwise expanded into automated portfolios for tokenized U.S. stocks, signaling diversification beyond Bitcoin. Market momentum and ETF inflows remain key themes.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Bitwise Bitcoin ETF. News trend score: 26. Reason: 7 of the last 18 articles are negative, versus 3 positive.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
18
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
22
Fundamentals
48
Technical
62
Valuation
50
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price (3M)
+19%
Market Narrative
29
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-21
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The market behavior for BITB suggests traders are anchored near resistance (2.5% below), while FOMO and euphoria signals coexist with neutral sentiment. The narrative gap (9 points) implies traders may overestimate recent momentum (+16.6% ROC) relative to fundamentals. Key uncertainty: whether traders will break resistance or adjust anchors if price stalls. The lack of panic or herding signals keeps behavior disciplined despite volatility (1.27x ATR).
Updated: 09/06/2026, 05:20 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"IBIT’s 0.25% Fee Hides the Real Cost: Your Bitcoin Per Share Shrinks Every Day, and the IRS Taxes Each Slice"
"Bitcoin reclaims $80K as Treasury liquidity and ETF inflows fuel its 2026 comeback. Can IBIT, FBTC, BITB and ARKB ride the rally?"
"Bitcoin ETFs logged $1.9 billion in weekly inflows. Here’s why IBIT, FBTC, ARKB, are back in focus."
"Bitwise has launched a new product that lets eligible investors follow professionally designed portfolios of tokenized U.S. stocks"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Charles Mackay — 88/100
🔴 Weakest match
Morgan Housel — 30/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide among methodologies, with some traders seeing clear buying opportunities while others flag significant risks. Jesse Livermore’s high score suggests the stock fits his pattern of bullish price action, while Howard Marks’ cycle-based approach also leans positive, though less aggressively. Meanwhile, Charles Mackay’s crowd psychology signals hint at early enthusiasm, reinforcing a cautiously optimistic view. In contrast, the majority of value-oriented investors—like Graham, Fisher, and Lynch—struggle to form a clear verdict due to insufficient data, leaving their models neutral. Even those with mixed or negative signals, such as Morgan Housel (warning of volatility) or Samuel Nelson (noting overbought conditions), contrast sharply with the momentum-driven optimists. The split highlights whether this stock’s momentum or speculative appeal outweighs its fundamental or cyclical risks.
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 88
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 72
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 67
Looks early-to-mid cycle, not overextended
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 66
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 50
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 50
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 50
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 46
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 46
No clear edge either way
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 41
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 30
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 274 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (6 bullish · 4 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
—
ROA
-10.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
—
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 3 positive, 8 neutral, 7 negative out of the last 18 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 13.9.2026
Benzinga · 3.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Yahoo · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
Yahoo · 25.8.2026
CryptoProwl · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 25.8.2026
Benzinga · 21.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 20.8.2026
Yahoo · 20.8.2026
Zacks · 20.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Benzinga · 12.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 4.8.2026
Bitwise Bitcoin ETF (BITB) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 49/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
BITB currently scores 49/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
BITB's technical score is 62/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 54.3 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: 0.37 (3y annualized return 19.7% / max drawdown 53.3%); Net income growth: -121.7%; MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for BITB.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 0 filings.
No recent insider transaction filings found for this stock.
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
696,257 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 113,531 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
43.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology