Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$20.34
▼ $0.12 (-0.6%)
Market data updated: 09/21 06:39 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/21/2026
News analyzed: 09/21/2026
Market Cap
$260.32M
Day Range
$20.15 - $20.59
52-Week Range
$13.92 - $27.02
Beta
—
Next Earnings
04.11.2026
Support
$18.56
Resistance
$24.00
-14.4% (1Y)
Strengths: 13/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟡 Mixed
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Golden Cross
SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $6.62 vs. price $20.34 (-67.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (76/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (33/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
56
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
76
Quality
63
Value
33
Momentum
47
Risk
46
Sentiment
86
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Aviat Networks (AVNW) has centered on its strategic focus on private networks amid declining margins, alongside strong financial performance. Analysts, including those from Roth Capital and B. Riley Securities, have raised price targets and maintained "Buy" ratings, citing robust Q2 and Q4 results. The company reported record backlog and key strategic wins, reinforcing investor confidence in its growth trajectory.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Aviat Networks, Inc.. News trend score: 86. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 3 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
29
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
52
Fundamentals
51
Technical
47
Valuation
33
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
78
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant **Overconfidence** (45) suggests traders are overestimating upside potential despite a disconnect between price momentum (-4.4%) and fundamental growth (+0.9% EPS). The **Euphoria** (35) score further highlights valuation extremes (+199% above DCF), while **FOMO** (13) and **Panic Selling** (14) remain muted due to neutral volatility and mixed momentum. The **narrative gap** (26) implies traders are overestimating positive narratives relative to market reality. The key question: *Will traders sustain overvaluation despite lagging fundamentals?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:37 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Roth Capital analyst Scott Searle maintains Aviat Networks with a Buy and raises the price target from $34 to $38"
"Aviat Networks, Inc. (AVNW) tops Q4 earnings and revenue estimates"
"Record backlog and strategic wins in Q4 2026 earnings call highlights"
"Aviat Networks (AVNW) bets big on private networks as margins slip"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Walter Bagehot — 76/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 29/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock’s divergent evaluations reflect stark contrasts between cyclical, fundamental, and behavioral frameworks. Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s high score highlights a favorable cycle position, suggesting the stock may be undervalued relative to its historical price swings, while Jesse Livermore’s low score aligns with his contrarian trend-following rule, dismissing it outright. Meanwhile, Walter Bagehot’s strong liquidity assessment contrasts sharply with Benjamin Graham’s defensive criteria failure, illustrating how liquidity and valuation frameworks clash—one prioritizes resilience, the other intrinsic worth. Peter Lynch’s mixed verdict and Philip Fisher’s rejection underscore a tension between growth potential (already priced in) and the need for proven quality, while Howard Marks’ two opposing verdicts reveal his dual focus on market cycles and business fundamentals. The middle-ground scores from efficient-market theorists and Veblen’s profit ambiguity further highlight whether this stock is a speculative bet or a disciplined hold.
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 67
Mixed — growth exists but the price already reflects much of it
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 60
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 57
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 57
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 55
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 49
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 47
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 47
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 44
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 39
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 33
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 29
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟡 Indicators are mixed — no clear bias (4 bullish · 6 bearish · 2 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Medium confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
31.5%
Operating Margin
4.4%
Net Margin
0.6%
EBITDA Margin
5.1%
ROE
0.9%
ROA
0.4%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.20
Cash
$72.84M
Total Debt
$97.00M
Current Ratio
1.97
Debt/Equity
0.36
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$20.34
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$6.62
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-67.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
8.7%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 8.7% | $6.62M | $6.07M |
| 2 | 7.2% | $7.09M | $5.97M |
| 3 | 5.6% | $7.49M | $5.79M |
| 4 | 4.1% | $7.80M | $5.52M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $7.99M | $5.19M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$6.09M
Terminal Value
$126.02M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$81.90M
Enterprise Value
$110.45M
Net Debt
$24.16M
Equity Value
$86.30M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$20.53
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$17.23
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
Benzinga · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 31.8.2026
Motley Fool · 31.8.2026
Benzinga · 31.8.2026
Zacks · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
Benzinga · 28.8.2026
MT Newswires · 28.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
GuruFocus.com · 27.8.2026
Moby · 27.8.2026
MarketBeat · 27.8.2026
Zacks · 27.8.2026
PR Newswire · 27.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Aviat Networks, Inc. (AVNW) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 56/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AVNW currently scores 56/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AVNW's estimated fair value is $6.62, which is 67.4% below the current price of $20.34. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AVNW's technical score is 47/100, which currently reads as neutral — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: SMA 50 recently crossed above SMA 200; Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 90.0%; Free cash flow growth: 184.0%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $6.62 vs. price $20.34 (-67.4%); ATR: 4.6% of price; Calmar: -0.23 (3y annualized return -14.7% / max drawdown 64.3%).
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for AVNW.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 10 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SMITH PETE A | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 14,264 | -14,264 | $19.69 |
| Croke Gary | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 629 | -629 | $19.69 |
| Boase Erin | Open Market Sale | 31.8.2026 | 1,347 | -1,347 | $19.69 |
| Boase Erin | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 3,826 | +3,826 | — |
| Croke Gary | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 1,208 | +1,208 | — |
| SMITH PETE A | Grant/Award from Employer | 28.8.2026 | 23,357 | +23,357 | — |
| Croke Gary | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.7.2026 | 1,968 | -1,968 | $20.54 |
| Croke Gary | Tax Withholding in Shares | 7.7.2026 | 41,900 | -1,968 | $20.54 |
| SMITH PETE A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.2.2026 | 26,386 | +26,386 | $11.00 |
| SMITH PETE A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.2.2026 | 26,386 | -26,386 | — |
| SMITH PETE A | Open Market Sale | 9.2.2026 | 17,086 | -17,086 | $26.33 |
| SMITH PETE A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.2.2026 | 375,833 | +26,386 | $11.00 |
| SMITH PETE A | Open Market Sale | 9.2.2026 | 358,747 | -17,086 | $26.33 |
| SMITH PETE A | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 9.2.2026 | 26,386 | -26,386 | — |
| Croke Gary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.2.2026 | 6,914 | +6,914 | $7.23 |
| Croke Gary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.2.2026 | 6,914 | -6,914 | — |
| Croke Gary | Open Market Sale | 6.2.2026 | 6,914 | -6,914 | $26.20 |
| Croke Gary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.2.2026 | 50,782 | +6,914 | $7.23 |
| Croke Gary | Open Market Sale | 6.2.2026 | 43,868 | -6,914 | $26.20 |
| Croke Gary | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 6.2.2026 | 0 | -6,914 | — |
| Schmidt Andrew C | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.12.2025 | 15,647 | +15,647 | — |
| Schmidt Andrew C | Grant/Award from Employer | 3.12.2025 | 15,647 | +15,647 | — |
| TATEN BRUCE M. | Open Market Sale | 11.11.2025 | 3,268 | -3,268 | $23.39 |
| SMITH PETE A | Open Market Sale | 11.11.2025 | 5,350 | -5,350 | $23.39 |
| TATEN BRUCE M. | Open Market Sale | 11.11.2025 | 20,391 | -3,268 | $23.39 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,096,677 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 960,606 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
62.3% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 58.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology