Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$123.40
▼ $1.04 (-0.8%)
Market data updated: 09/22 01:50 AM
Fundamentals updated: 09/22/2026
News analyzed: 09/22/2026
Market Cap
$7.85B
Day Range
$123.32 - $125.98
52-Week Range
$103.23 - $146.91
Beta
—
Next Earnings
29.10.2026
Support
$120.74
Resistance
$139.57
-8.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 8/30 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Operating margin stability
Operating margin is stable or improving over time
Quality
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $77.18 vs. price $123.40 (-37.5%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
51
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
50
Quality
63
Value
38
Momentum
20
Risk
62
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
67
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) has primarily focused on its strong second-quarter earnings performance, with revenue surpassing $1 billion for the first time, driven by growth in its pharmaceutical and beverage sectors. Analysts noted margin pressures but acknowledged the positive results, which beat estimates. Additionally, there were reports of insider share sales and a downward target price adjustment by one analyst, while broader market discussions included dividend-related trends unrelated to AptarGroup. No company-specific developments beyond earnings and insider activity were highlighted.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AptarGroup, Inc.. News trend score: 100. Reason: 12 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
32
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
42
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
67
Technical
20
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Price (3M)
+2%
Market Narrative
70
Fundamental Reality
42
Narrative Gap
+28
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The dominant anchoring behavior (85) reflects traders’ fixation on the 0.7% proximity to support, likely ignoring weak momentum (-3.8% ROC) and valuation disconnect (+65% above DCF). Overconfidence (45) and euphoria (35) coexist, driven by extreme sentiment (100/100) and detached valuation metrics, despite divergent fundamentals. The 30-point narrative gap (72 vs. 42) hints at a disconnect between market enthusiasm and underlying reality. The key question: will traders break free from anchoring or double down on overvalued optimism?
Updated: 09/05/2026, 06:35 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"ATR tops Q2 earnings and revenue estimates as pharma and beverage growth lift quarterly revenues above $1B for the first time"
"Review AptarGroup's (ATR) international revenue performance and how it affects the predictions of financial analysts"
"Aptargroup insider sold shares worth $1,339,588, according to a recent SEC filing"
📈 6D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 93/100
🔴 Weakest match
Jesse Livermore — 23/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
Based on Samuel Armstrong Nelson’s documented cycle‑position principles, the model estimates a highly favorable outlook, reflected by his perfect score of 100, while Edgar Lawrence Smith’s long‑term buy‑and‑hold criteria also rate the stock positively at 76. In contrast, investors focused on value and safety such as Benjamin Graham (scores 27‑25) and Philip Fisher (33) find the company lacking key defensive or growth‑quality signals, leading to low scores. Mid‑range thinkers like Howard Marks, Morgan Housel, and Jack Schwager produce mixed verdicts (scores 41‑64), indicating that liquidity, cycle timing, and modest edge are borderline. The spread of scores—from very bullish to clearly skeptical—illustrates how each methodology’s distinct emphasis on cycles, long‑term fundamentals, capital preservation, and market efficiency drives divergent conclusions about ATR.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 93
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 76
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟢 72
A real, disciplined setup with favorable reward/risk
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 70
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 63
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 57
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 56
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟡 56
Moderate — holdable, but not effortless
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 51
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 46
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 30
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 28
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 25
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 23
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 281 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (1 bullish · 9 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear downtrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
13.3%
Net Margin
10.4%
EBITDA Margin
20.9%
ROE
14.7%
ROA
7.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$5.97
Cash
$402.42M
Total Debt
$183.95M
Current Ratio
1.62
Debt/Equity
0.07
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 30.7.2026 | $0.480 |
| 29.7.2026 | $0.480 |
| 6.5.2026 | $0.480 |
| 5.5.2026 | $0.480 |
| 4.2.2026 | $0.480 |
| 3.2.2026 | $0.480 |
| 23.10.2025 | $0.480 |
| 22.10.2025 | $0.480 |
| 24.7.2025 | $0.450 |
| 23.7.2025 | $0.450 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.450 |
| 30.4.2025 | $0.450 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$123.40
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$77.18
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-37.5%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
4.4%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4.4% | $312.69M | $286.87M |
| 2 | 3.9% | $324.91M | $273.47M |
| 3 | 3.4% | $336.09M | $259.52M |
| 4 | 3.0% | $346.07M | $245.16M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $354.72M | $230.54M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$299.58M
Terminal Value
$5.59B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$3.64B
Enterprise Value
$4.93B
Net Debt
$-218.48M
Equity Value
$5.15B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$39.99
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$20.01
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 12 positive, 7 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Benzinga · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 9.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.8.2026
Zacks · 14.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.8.2026
Zacks · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 13.8.2026
Yahoo · 5.8.2026
Zacks · 5.8.2026
Argus Research · 4.8.2026
MT Newswires · 4.8.2026
MT Newswires · 4.8.2026
Yahoo · 3.8.2026
Zacks · 3.8.2026
Benzinga · 3.8.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 31.7.2026
Yahoo · 31.7.2026
AptarGroup, Inc. (ATR) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 51/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ATR currently scores 51/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ATR's estimated fair value is $77.18, which is 37.5% below the current price of $123.40. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ATR's technical score is 20/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Operating margin is stable or improving over time; ATR: 2.0% of price; Debt/equity: 0.07.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $77.18 vs. price $123.40 (-37.5%); Calmar: 0.01 (3y annualized return 0.2% / max drawdown 36.5%); Free cash flow growth: -18.4%.
Yes — ATR has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Vinczeller Shiela | Open Market Sale | 2.9.2026 | 765 | -765 | $130.37 |
| Touya Gael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 9,531 | +9,531 | — |
| Touya Gael | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.9.2026 | 2,637 | +2,637 | — |
| Touya Gael | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 29,102 | -325 | $134.55 |
| Touya Gael | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 29,427 | -3,415 | $133.69 |
| Touya Gael | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 325 | -325 | $134.55 |
| Touya Gael | Open Market Sale | 27.8.2026 | 3,415 | -3,415 | $133.69 |
| Prieur Marc | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 124 | -124 | $137.10 |
| Prieur Marc | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 3,376 | -3,376 | $136.23 |
| Prieur Marc | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 15,947 | -3,376 | $136.23 |
| Prieur Marc | Open Market Sale | 4.8.2026 | 15,823 | -124 | $137.10 |
| Tlili Hedi | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 8,854 | -8,854 | $135.00 |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 9,838 | -9,838 | $136.16 |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 9,838 | -9,838 | — |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 9,838 | +9,838 | $74.79 |
| Tlili Hedi | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 15,379 | -8,854 | $135.00 |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 248,567 | +9,838 | $74.79 |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Open Market Sale | 3.8.2026 | 238,729 | -9,838 | $136.16 |
| Tanda Stephan B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 3.8.2026 | 0 | -9,838 | — |
| Wunderlich Ralf K. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
| FOTIADES GEORGE L | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
| Owens B Craig | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
| Marey-Semper Isabel | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
| Glickman Sarah JS | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
| Xing Julie | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.7.2026 | 151 | +151 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,667,073 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,835,928 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
65.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.5% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology