Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$10.89
▼ $0.00 (-0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/16 05:08 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/16/2026
Market Cap
$132.15M
Day Range
$10.89 - $10.89
52-Week Range
$10.54 - $10.99
Beta
—
Next Earnings
—
+3.2% (1Y)
Strengths: 14/19 factors positiveRisk: Low
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Net income growth
Net income growth: 49.8%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Return on equity (ROE)
Return on equity (ROE): -86.4% (negative)
Fundamental
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
59
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
58
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
77
Risk
72
Sentiment
50
Fundamental
46
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
16
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
89
Fundamentals
46
Technical
77
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price (3M)
+0%
Market Narrative
44
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
-6
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: Medium (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Morgan Housel — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 12/100
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟢 100
Not enough balance-sheet/valuation data for a real Graham read
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 15%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟢 100
Not enough valuation data for a real Enterprising-Graham read
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 91
Strong liquidity — would likely survive a real credit squeeze
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 86
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟢 80
Risk appears reasonably priced — no obvious cycle-timing red flag
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 80
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟡 50
Not enough growth data for a real Lynch read
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 50
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 47
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 35
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 33
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 22
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🔴 15
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 12
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 276 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (9 bullish · 3 bearish · 0 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$10.75
Range Bottom
$10.95
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-86.4%
ROA
3.8%
ROIC
—
EPS
—
Cash
$100.98K
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
2.66
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
—
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
—
Not enough data to compute signals.
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 0 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 0 articles.
No recent articles found for this stock.
Centurion Acquisition Corp. (ALF) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 59/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALF currently scores 59/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
ALF's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Net income growth: 49.8%; ATR: 0.0% of price; Calmar: 2.19 (3y annualized return 4.0% / max drawdown 1.8%).
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Return on equity (ROE): -86.4% (negative); -0.3% over the last 3 months relative to the index; %K 100.0 — overbought.
StockIQ has no recorded dividend payment history for ALF.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 22 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Foresman Robert | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| JESSELSON MICHAEL G | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Vu Thomas Theodore | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Centurion Sponsor LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 7,067,500 | +7,067,500 | — |
| Rosen Mickie | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Vu Thomas Theodore | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| JESSELSON MICHAEL G | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Foresman Robert | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Centurion Sponsor LP | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 7,067,500 | -7,067,500 | — |
| Rosen Mickie | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
| Foresman Robert | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Foresman Robert | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -30,000 | — |
| Gomberg David | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 7,067,500 | +7,067,500 | — |
| Gomberg David | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -7,067,500 | — |
| Rosen Mickie | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Rosen Mickie | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -30,000 | — |
| JESSELSON MICHAEL G | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| JESSELSON MICHAEL G | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -30,000 | — |
| Vu Thomas Theodore | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 30,000 | +30,000 | — |
| Vu Thomas Theodore | Conversion of Derivative Security | 8.6.2026 | 0 | -30,000 | — |
| Centurion Sponsor LP | Other Transaction | 9.6.2025 | 30,000 | -30,000 | $90.00 |
| Centurion Sponsor LP | Other Transaction | 9.6.2025 | 30,000 | -30,000 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,393 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 1,393 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
47.8% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 62.1% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology