Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
· ·
$39.60
▲ $0.14 (+0.4%)
Market data updated: 09/15 05:20 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/15/2026
News analyzed: 09/15/2026
Market Cap
$293.78M
Day Range
$39.48 - $39.85
52-Week Range
$31.32 - $45.01
Beta
—
Next Earnings
23.11.2026
+15.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 3/32 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🔴 Bearish
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Free cash flow growth
Free cash flow growth: 130.2%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.41 vs. price $39.60 (-51.0%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
34
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
40
Quality
42
Value
38
Momentum
13
Risk
56
Sentiment
80
Fundamental
22
Institutional
100
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of Alico, Inc. has centered on its strategic pivot from citrus production to Florida land development and land leasing. The company reported strong Q3 2026 earnings, driven by revenue growth in land management, while its citrus operations continue to decline. Alico also highlighted its participation in the IDEAS Investor Conference, emphasizing its expanding real estate and development initiatives.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Alico, Inc.. News trend score: 80. Reason: 5 of the last 15 articles are positive, versus 0 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
26
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
21
Psychology
75
Fundamentals
22
Technical
13
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Price, sentiment, and valuation keep confirming each other upward while the actual fundamentals deteriorate.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
-2%
Market Narrative
68
Fundamental Reality
21
Narrative Gap
+47
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ALCO’s dominant **Overconfidence (77)** stems from a disconnect between price momentum (+1.3% ROC) and deteriorating fundamentals (–22.2% EPS growth). The **Confirmation Bias (64)**—driven by a +49 narrative gap—suggests investors cherry-pick positive narratives while ignoring revenue declines and shrinking margins. While **Euphoria (31)** is present due to extreme valuation (+108% DCF), the lack of panic or herding implies confidence is selective, not panicked. The key question: *Will traders pivot when fundamentals fail to justify the premium?*
Updated: 09/07/2026, 04:30 PM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Land leasing income drove revenue growth as citrus winds down and development advances."
"Alico Maps Shift From Citrus to Florida Land Development"
"Alico (ALCO) Surpasses Q3 Earnings and Revenue Estimates"
"Alico 3Q Revenue Jumps on Booming Land Management Strategy"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 84/100
🔴 Weakest match
Peter Lynch — 16/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for ALCO reflects deep methodological contrasts: patient, long-term thinkers like Morgan Housel and Walter Bagehot see it as a steady, liquid enough bet for a disciplined holder, scoring in the mid-60s, while contrarian or cyclical investors like Jesse Livermore and Thorstein Veblen dismiss it outright, flagging negative trends or speculative growth patterns. Meanwhile, value-focused methodologies—from Graham’s defensive criteria to Fisher’s quality standards—score it poorly, with Lynch and Schwager’s wizards outright rejecting it as lacking growth or setup. The middle-ground approaches (Marks, Nelson) are lukewarm, caught between mixed signals, while the efficient-market camp sees no compelling edge over indexing. The tension lies between those prioritizing stability (Bagehot, Housel) and those demanding clear edge cases (Livermore, Fisher), with the latter’s low scores suggesting ALCO fails to meet their rigorous thresholds.
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 84
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 68
Adequate but not exceptional liquidity
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 68
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 66
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟡 63
Moderate risk to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 49
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 45
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 45
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 44
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 43
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 33
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 30
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 30
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 26
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 26
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 16
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (0 bullish · 10 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$37.54
Range Bottom
$43.48
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
-436.2%
Operating Margin
-462.7%
Net Margin
-334.3%
EBITDA Margin
-61.9%
ROE
-143.0%
ROA
-73.1%
ROIC
—
EPS
-$19.29
Cash
$38.13M
Total Debt
$83.05M
Current Ratio
9.56
Debt/Equity
0.81
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 2.7.2026 | $0.050 |
| 1.7.2026 | $0.050 |
| 2.4.2026 | $0.050 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.050 |
| 2.1.2026 | $0.050 |
| 1.1.2026 | $0.050 |
| 26.9.2025 | $0.050 |
| 25.9.2025 | $0.050 |
| 27.6.2025 | $0.050 |
| 26.6.2025 | $0.050 |
| 28.3.2025 | $0.050 |
| 27.3.2025 | $0.050 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$39.60
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.41
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-51.0%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
-5.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | -5.0% | $13.89M | $12.74M |
| 2 | -3.1% | $13.46M | $11.33M |
| 3 | -1.2% | $13.29M | $10.26M |
| 4 | 0.6% | $13.37M | $9.47M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $13.71M | $8.91M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$14.62M
Terminal Value
$216.13M
Present Value of Terminal Value
$140.47M
Enterprise Value
$193.18M
Net Debt
$44.92M
Equity Value
$148.26M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$13.49
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$13.19
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 5 positive, 10 neutral, 0 negative out of the last 15 articles.
Yahoo · 29.8.2026
MarketBeat · 29.8.2026
Yahoo · 17.8.2026
Motley Fool · 17.8.2026
Exec Edge · 12.8.2026
Exec Edge · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
MarketBeat · 11.8.2026
Moby · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 11.8.2026
Zacks · 10.8.2026
MT Newswires · 10.8.2026
Associated Press · 10.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.8.2026
Benzinga · 10.8.2026
Alico, Inc. (ALCO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 34/100, rated "Weak". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ALCO currently scores 34/100 (Weak) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ALCO's estimated fair value is $19.41, which is 51.0% below the current price of $39.60. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ALCO's technical score is 13/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Free cash flow growth: 130.2%; Current ratio: 9.56; Current ratio: 9.56.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.41 vs. price $39.60 (-51.0%); Operating margin: -462.7% (negative); Net margin: -334.3% (negative).
Yes — ALCO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 1 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SPERON ERIC H. | Open Market Purchase | 20.8.2026 | 1,250 | +1,250 | $39.73 |
| Kiernan John E | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 160,000 | +160,000 | — |
| Kiernan John E | Grant/Award from Employer | 14.7.2026 | 160,000 | +160,000 | — |
| Putnam Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 785 | +785 | — |
| Purse Toby K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 513 | +513 | — |
| English Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 483 | +483 | — |
| SPERON ERIC H. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 453 | +453 | — |
| SPERON ERIC H. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 1,060 | +453 | — |
| Purse Toby K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 21,341 | +513 | — |
| English Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 15,382 | +483 | — |
| Putnam Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.7.2026 | 18,484 | +785 | — |
| Purse Toby K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 516 | +516 | $41.21 |
| English Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 486 | +486 | $41.21 |
| Putnam Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 789 | +789 | $41.21 |
| SPERON ERIC H. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 607 | +607 | $41.21 |
| SPERON ERIC H. | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 607 | +607 | $41.21 |
| Purse Toby K | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 20,828 | +516 | $41.21 |
| English Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 14,899 | +486 | $41.21 |
| Putnam Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 1.4.2026 | 17,699 | +789 | $41.21 |
| Putnam Adam | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 859 | +859 | — |
| Fishman Benjamin D | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 344 | +344 | — |
| KRUSEN W ANDREW JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 344 | +344 | — |
| Purse Toby K | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 585 | +585 | — |
| English Katherine | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 550 | +550 | — |
| KRUSEN W ANDREW JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 2.1.2026 | 43,074 | +344 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
174,240 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 156,153 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
55.5% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 69.0% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology