Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Consumer Staples · ·
$11.89
▲ $0.27 (+2.3%)
Market data updated: 09/17 07:00 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/17/2026
News analyzed: 09/17/2026
Market Cap
$1.70B
Day Range
$11.56 - $12.12
52-Week Range
$6.89 - $15.89
Beta
—
Next Earnings
09.11.2026
AGRO is a stock from the Consumer Defensive sector — Food, beverages, and household products — steady demand even in a recession, since these are essential consumer goods.
+41.5% (1Y)
Strengths: 7/28 factors positiveRisk: High
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Price vs. SMA 50
Price is above the 50-day average
Technical
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $6.82 vs. price $11.89 (-42.7%)
Fair Value
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🕰️ Signal Timeline
What StockIQ actually saw for this stock, and what happened after each signal — real data, not a forecast.
15d ago · $12.02
Evidence: Euphoria score crossed 55 (now 68)
What happened after
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
32
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
69
Risk
34
Sentiment
100
Fundamental
28
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Adecoagro S.A.** has primarily focused on its strategic expansion in South America, particularly the **completion of the acquisition of the Caarapó Mill in Mato Grosso do Sul** from Raízen Group, announced on September 1, 2026. The move strengthens its agricultural production cluster, though broader industry headlines (e.g., stablecoin farmland investments) do not directly relate to Adecoagro. The company’s recent focus remains on operational growth and integration in its core markets.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adecoagro S.A. Common. News trend score: 100. Reason: 10 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
37
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
57
Fundamentals
28
Technical
69
Valuation
38
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Price (3M)
+26%
Market Narrative
86
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+36
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
AGRO’s psychology is dominated by anchoring (82), where traders appear fixated on resistance at 0.9% distance, despite euphoric overvaluation (+80% vs. DCF) and overconfidence (62). The narrative gap (40) hints at a disconnect between optimistic expectations (90) and fundamentals (50). FOMO (52) and overconfidence may amplify buying near resistance, but the key question remains: will traders break the anchor, or will the stock test support if momentum stalls? Overconfidence in momentum vs. weak EPS growth could heighten risk if fundamentals diverge further.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:06 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adecoagro S.A. completed the acquisition of the Caarapó Mill and integrated it into its cluster in Mato Grosso do Sul"
"Tether calls its Adecoagro farms 'Stable Cows' with 14,500 dairy cows now feeding its Bitcoin mining push"
📈 10D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 58/100
🔴 Weakest match
Philip Fisher — 0/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AGRO reflects deep methodological differences in how these investors evaluate stocks. Jesse Livermore’s high score suggests he would see a clear upward price trend aligning with his momentum-driven approach, while the majority of value-oriented methodologies—like Graham’s defensive or enterprising criteria—rank it modestly or poorly, flagging it as either a marginal bargain or outright risky. Meanwhile, behavioral and cycle-focused thinkers like Mackay, Marks, and Nelson paint a picture of speculative excess or overvaluation, contrasting sharply with Lynch’s and Fisher’s near-zero scores, which dismiss it outright for lacking growth or quality. The efficient-market camp sits in the middle, neither endorsing nor rejecting the stock, while the lowest scorers (Veblen, Housel) warn of unsustainable patterns or volatility that would test even the most patient investors.
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🟡 58
Mixed case — the evidence for picking this stock over an index is not strong
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🟡 58
Some discount, but not the deep 'net-net' bargain Graham's enterprising bar sets
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 55
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟡 51
Mid-cycle — no strong signal either way
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟡 51
Reasonable but not a clear long-term holding
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 44
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟡 44
Pattern consistent with a crowd delusion Mackay would flag
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 41
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🟡 38
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🔴 25
Risk/valuation combination Marks would flag as a caution sign
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🔴 21
Liquidity position Bagehot would flag as a real risk
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🔴 21
Risk profile Loeb would flag as a real threat to capital
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 13
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🔴 8
Doesn't clear Lynch's growth-at-a-reasonable-price bar
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🔴 1
The kind of volatility that tends to shake patient holders out
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🔴 0
Doesn't show the quality/growth signature Fisher required
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 35%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 279 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (7 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
High confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
17.8%
Operating Margin
6.6%
Net Margin
-0.6%
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
-0.5%
ROA
-0.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$0.90
Cash
$211.24M
Total Debt
$779.56M
Current Ratio
1.38
Debt/Equity
1.18
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 4.5.2026 | $0.121 |
| 3.5.2026 | $0.121 |
| 2.5.2025 | $0.175 |
| 1.5.2025 | $0.175 |
| 12.11.2024 | $0.174 |
| 11.11.2024 | $0.174 |
| 13.5.2024 | $0.168 |
| 12.5.2024 | $0.168 |
| 8.11.2023 | $0.165 |
| 7.11.2023 | $0.165 |
| 8.5.2023 | $0.163 |
| 7.5.2023 | $0.163 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$11.89
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$6.82
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-42.7%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $74.93M | $68.74M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $81.02M | $68.19M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $86.08M | $66.47M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $89.85M | $63.65M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $92.10M | $59.86M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$68.12M
Terminal Value
$1.45B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$943.89M
Enterprise Value
$1.27B
Net Debt
$568.31M
Equity Value
$702.50M
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$11.61
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.43
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 10 positive, 9 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 20 articles.
SeekingAlpha · 16.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
Zacks · 14.9.2026
Insider Monkey · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
BeInCrypto · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 7.9.2026
Zacks · 7.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
Zacks · 2.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
PR Newswire · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
Zacks · 1.9.2026
Yahoo · 1.9.2026
BeInCrypto · 1.9.2026
MT Newswires · 27.8.2026
Benzinga · 27.8.2026
Adecoagro S.A. Common (AGRO) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGRO currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, AGRO's estimated fair value is $6.82, which is 42.7% below the current price of $11.89. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
AGRO's technical score is 69/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Price is above the 50-day average; Price is above the 200-day average; RSI 56.1 — healthy positive momentum.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $6.82 vs. price $11.89 (-42.7%); Net margin: -0.6% (negative); ATR: 4.3% of price.
Yes — AGRO has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 13 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sarjanovic Ivo | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Deprati Christian Ferdinando Emilio | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Louis Dreyfus Kyril Robert Leonid | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Vaz Artigas Manuela | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Leon Bentancor Oscar Alejandro | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Larriera Andres Eduardo | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 1,163 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Deprati Christian Ferdinando Emilio | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 8,775 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Larriera Andres Eduardo | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 8,775 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Vaz Artigas Manuela | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 10,735 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Sarjanovic Ivo | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 21,561 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Louis Dreyfus Kyril Robert Leonid | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 8,661 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Leon Bentancor Oscar Alejandro | Open Market Sale | 21.4.2026 | 8,775 | -1,163 | $13.03 |
| Sarjanovic Ivo | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Deprati Christian Ferdinando Emilio | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Larriera Andres Eduardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Vaz Artigas Manuela | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Leon Bentancor Oscar Alejandro | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Louis Dreyfus Kyril Robert Leonid | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 5,814 | +5,814 | — |
| Deprati Christian Ferdinando Emilio | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 9,938 | +5,814 | — |
| Larriera Andres Eduardo | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 9,938 | +5,814 | — |
| Vaz Artigas Manuela | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 11,898 | +5,814 | — |
| Leon Bentancor Oscar Alejandro | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 9,938 | +5,814 | — |
| Louis Dreyfus Kyril Robert Leonid | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 9,824 | +5,814 | — |
| Sarjanovic Ivo | Grant/Award from Employer | 15.4.2026 | 22,724 | +5,814 | — |
| Vaz Artigas Manuela | Open Market Sale | 7.4.2026 | 1,000 | -1,000 | $15.03 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,290,800 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 959,125 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
41.9% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 60.8% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology