Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$25.79
▲ $0.01 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 04:48 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/19/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$30.57B
Day Range
$25.76 - $25.86
52-Week Range
$24.65 - $26.11
Beta
—
Next Earnings
19.10.2026
Support
$25.40
Resistance
$25.99
AGNCN is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
-0.3% (1Y)
Strengths: 5/19 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🔴 Bearish
Insiders
🔴 Bearish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 58.1%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
Calmar Ratio (return vs. drawdown)
Calmar: -0.00 (3y annualized return -0.0% / max drawdown 8.4%)
Risk
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 2 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 2
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
50
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
66
Quality
No data available
Value
50
Momentum
33
Risk
50
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
51
Institutional
0
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage on **AGNC Investment Corp.** has primarily focused on its **monthly dividend payments** and **valuation potential**, with analysts highlighting its status as a high-yield dividend stock. One source suggested the company’s stock may be **31% undervalued based on equity returns**, while another analyzed its **dividend sustainability**. However, broader industry trends—such as rising long-term yields impacting REITs—were also noted, though AGNC itself wasn’t the central focus in most headlines. The available sources are limited to general dividend and market discussions rather than AGNC-specific developments.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about AGNC Investment Corp. Depositary Shares Each Representing a 1/1000th Interest in a Share of 7.00% Series C Fixed-To-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock. News trend score: 68. Reason: 9 of the last 20 articles are positive, versus 6 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
10
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
84
Fundamentals
51
Technical
33
Valuation
50
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
A sharp drop, unusual volume, and negative news sentiment all at once — selling pressure that looks emotional.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
-0%
Market Narrative
51
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+1
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
The extreme anchoring score (88) reflects traders’ fixation on resistance, likely due to recent price action clustering near this level. Herding (31) hints at some peer influence, but the stock’s underperformance relative to peers suggests selective participation. The narrative gap (1) is negligible, meaning no stark disconnect between market sentiment and fundamentals. The key question is whether traders will break resistance or retreat further, given the lack of momentum or volatility extremes.
Updated: 09/09/2026, 01:05 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"AGNC Investment Corp's Dividend Analysis highlights its 'consistent monthly payouts'"
"5 Dividend Stocks That Lose the Most to Taxes When They’re Held Outside of a Roth IRA (includes AGNC)"
"AGNC stock may be 31% undervalued on equity returns (Simply Wall St.)"
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 100/100
🔴 Weakest match
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor) — 8/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
The stark divide in verdicts for AGNCN reflects a clash between growth-oriented methodologies and more conservative, cyclical, or market-efficient frameworks. Lynch, Smith, and Housel all score perfectly, seeing it as a high-potential growth or compounding opportunity—Lynch and Housel emphasizing its underappreciated upside, while Smith’s lack of dividend/growth data suggests he’d either defer or focus on other metrics. Meanwhile, Nelson and Mackay, with mid-to-high scores, lean toward cyclical or contrarian views, noting it may be oversold or free of speculative bubbles. On the opposite end, Graham (both Defensive and Enterprising Investor), Livermore, and Schwager dismiss it outright—Graham’s Enterprising Investor standard is too strict, Livermore’s trend-following rules flag a negative bias, and Schwager’s disciplined wizards see no clear technical setup. Marks and Bagehot’s mixed or incomplete verdicts highlight a middle ground: Marks sees potential but warns of inflated expectations, while Bagehot lacks sufficient balance-sheet clarity. The efficient-market camp and Veblen’s consumerist critique further undercut the stock, framing it as either overpriced or a speculative growth trap.
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 100
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 100
Not enough dividend/growth data for a real Smith read
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 100
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 30%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🟢 87
Cycle position looks favorable — closer to oversold than overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 86
No obvious signs of crowd mania
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 69
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 60
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 55
Somewhere in the middle of the cycle
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟡 50
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟡 50
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 0%
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🟡 47
Mixed — doesn't clearly pass Graham's tests
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🔴 32
Pattern Veblen would flag as growth pursued for its own sake
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🔴 30
Negative trend — against Livermore's core rule of trading with the trend
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 29
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 17
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 8
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 283 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🔴 Most indicators support a downtrend (2 bullish · 8 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a trading range, but the picture isn't yet clear enough on the likely direction.
Low confidence
$25.40
Range Bottom
$25.99
Range Top
50
Trading Days in Range
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
13.5%
ROA
1.5%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.48
Cash
$450.00M
Total Debt
—
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
—
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.572 |
| 30.6.2026 | $0.572 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.565 |
| 31.3.2026 | $0.565 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.592 |
| 30.12.2025 | $0.592 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.619 |
| 30.9.2025 | $0.619 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.609 |
| 30.6.2025 | $0.609 |
| 1.4.2025 | $0.605 |
| 31.3.2025 | $0.605 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Not enough cash-flow data to calculate a DCF model for this stock.
Book Value per Share
$12.11
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$11.59
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 9 positive, 5 neutral, 6 negative out of the last 20 articles.
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 18.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 18.9.2026
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 16.9.2026
Yahoo · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 14.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 14.9.2026
Yahoo · 12.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 12.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
24/7 Wall St. · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 11.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
AGNC Investment Corp. Depositary Shares Each Representing a 1/1000th Interest in a Share of 7.00% Series C Fixed-To-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock (AGNCN) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 50/100, rated "Moderate" (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
AGNCN currently scores 50/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure (a partial score — based on only 6 of 7 categories, some data is currently unavailable). StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
AGNCN's technical score is 33/100, which currently reads as bearish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 58.1%; Net income growth: 93.5%; ATR: 0.3% of price.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Calmar: -0.00 (3y annualized return -0.0% / max drawdown 8.4%); MACD histogram is negative — falling momentum; -2.3% over the last 3 months relative to the index.
Yes — AGNCN has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 9 sales out of the last 18 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Bell Bernice | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $11.10 |
| Bell Bernice | Open Market Sale | 19.8.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $11.05 |
| Bell Bernice | Open Market Sale | 28.7.2026 | 5,000 | -5,000 | $11.00 |
| Bell Bernice | Open Market Sale | 12.5.2026 | 10,000 | -10,000 | $10.79 |
| BLANK DONNA | Open Market Sale | 6.5.2026 | 22,000 | -22,000 | $10.78 |
| Mullings Paul E | Open Market Sale | 4.5.2026 | 6,800 | -6,800 | $10.74 |
| Federico Peter J | Open Market Sale | 28.4.2026 | 64,412 | -64,412 | $11.08 |
| Federico Peter J | Open Market Sale | 27.4.2026 | 64,411 | -64,411 | $11.03 |
| Federico Peter J | Open Market Sale | 24.4.2026 | 64,411 | -64,411 | $10.91 |
| Larocca Prue | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| JOHNSON ANDREW A JR | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| Davis Morris A. | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| SPARK FRANCES | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| BLANK DONNA | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| Hurtsellers Christine | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| FISK JOHN D | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| Mullings Paul E | Grant/Award from Employer | 16.4.2026 | 17,045 | +17,045 | — |
| Bell Bernice | Tax Withholding in Shares | 16.3.2026 | 48,988 | -48,988 | $10.33 |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
30,131 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 59,063 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
33.2% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 48.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology