Loading data...
Loading data...
Analyzing the stock…
70
Gathering technical, fundamental, and market data — a few seconds
Real Estate · ·
$25.03
▲ $0.01 (+0.0%)
Market data updated: 09/19 12:11 PM
Fundamentals updated: 09/18/2026
News analyzed: 09/19/2026
Market Cap
$2.25B
Day Range
$25.00 - $25.12
52-Week Range
$21.96 - $25.12
Beta
—
Next Earnings
27.10.2026
Support
$24.33
Resistance
$25.11
ADAML is a stock from the Real Estate sector — REITs and real-estate companies — highly sensitive to interest rates and property prices.
+10.0% (1Y)
Strengths: 12/25 factors positiveRisk: Medium
This score and all analysis on this page are for informational and educational purposes only and do not constitute investment advice. Read the full disclaimer
Weighted: Technical 25% · Fundamental 20% · Growth 15% · Valuation 15% · News 10% · Quality 10% · Risk 5%
Overall Score
🟡 Mixed
Technical Trend
🟢 Bullish
Computed directly from the same signals behind the score above — not AI-generated.
Biggest positive driver
Earnings per share (EPS) growth
Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%
Growth
Biggest negative driver
DCF Fair Value
Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.03 (-20.4%)
Fair Value
Signal tension
Growth scores strong (74/100), but fair-value analysis scores this stock as relatively expensive (38/100) — the growth story and the current price aren't fully aligned.
What to watch next
When today echoes the past.
NO RELIABLE ECHO FOUND
Only 1 historical analog(s) found after removing overlapping dates — too few for a statistically meaningful comparison.
Historical matches considered: 1
TIME ECHO identifies historical situations that resemble the current market state. Historical outcomes are not guarantees of future performance. Similarity does not imply causation, and results may change as new data becomes available.
🗓️ What Changed This Week
🌱 Building History
We don't have a real data point from a week ago for this stock yet. The weekly comparison will appear once enough history has accumulated.
📊 Score History
61
Today
—
30D
—
90D
—
1Y
🐂🐻 Investment Thesis
🐂 Bull Case
🐻 Bear Case
🔍 What Could Prove This Wrong
This isn't a price-direction forecast — just a synthesis of real, already-computed data, and future conditions that could change the picture.
🧬 STOCK DNA
This stock's profile across 8 real dimensions — a research tool, not a recommendation
Growth
74
Quality
50
Value
38
Momentum
77
Risk
58
Sentiment
68
Fundamental
51
Institutional
No data available
Stocks with a similar DNA right now
Not enough comparably-scored stocks yet to show similar matches.
This stock hasn't been analyzed by StockIQAI's movement engine yet — coverage is still expanding. Check back soon.
Recent media coverage of **Adamas Trust Inc.** highlights its strong financial performance and growth momentum, particularly in Q2 2026, where it reported record **Exposure at Default (EAD) growth** and strategic expansion. The company has raised its **quarterly dividend by 11.1%** and issued new **senior notes**, signaling investor confidence. Analysts note accelerating earnings, revenue, and profitability, though concerns persist over **high debt levels and liquidity risks**. Comparisons between its preferred stock (ADAML) and senior notes (ADAMI) also drew attention, emphasizing yield and risk factors.
AI summary based on English-language news sources only — not investment advice.
Everyone's writing about Adamas Trust Inc. 6.875% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock $0.01 par value per share. News trend score: 68. Reason: 4 of the last 16 articles are positive, versus 1 negative.
News trend analysis is based on article sentiment only, and is not investment advice or financial counsel. Read the full disclaimer
🌡️ Emotional Temperature
27
🎯 Conviction (vs. Emotion)
50
Psychology
100
Fundamentals
51
Technical
77
Valuation
38
The price is holding at a real, documented historical support/resistance level (a 50-day high or low).
The stock is moving in lockstep with its peers at the same intensity, rather than on its own data.
Price, volume, and sentiment accelerating together — a sign investors are chasing the price, not just following it.
The price rise has far outpaced the actual improvement in fundamental data.
Extreme momentum, price far above its moving average, and a large premium over fair value.
Price (3M)
+3%
Market Narrative
59
Fundamental Reality
50
Narrative Gap
+9
🔀 Psychology Acceleration
News attention/sentiment is running well ahead of the price move itself.
🧠 StockIQ Psychologist
ADAML’s psychology is dominated by anchoring, with traders fixated on a 0.1% resistance level, ignoring broader valuation gaps (+25% DCF premium). Overconfidence (23) and euphoria (11) coexist, as price ignores fundamental growth (+2.0% EPS) and trades above long-term averages. The narrative gap (3) hints at slight optimism over reality, but flat momentum and neutral volume dampen speculative urgency. The key question: will traders break the resistance anchor, or will overvaluation trigger re-evaluation?
Updated: 09/06/2026, 11:52 AM
What could change this?
👥 What the crowd believes
"Adamas Trust Increases Quarterly Common Stock Dividend by 11.1% to $0.30 Per Share"
"ADAML passes Navellier's Little Book growth screen with strong earnings, revenue, and margin momentum"
"high debt and weak liquidity are risks"
"Click to see a comparison between Adamas Trust’s ADAML preferred vs. ADAMI senior notes: yields, floating coupons, call risk, coverage and more"
📈 4D Investor Psychology
Signal classification confidence: High (confidence in the behavioral read, not a price prediction). Describes observable market behavior, not what any individual investor thinks, and is not a buy/sell signal.
🏛️ Investor DNA — Historical Investors
A Historical Strategy Simulation: assuming each investor follows their documented principles, how would they rate this stock today? This is not a prediction of what they would actually do.
🟢 Best match
Peter Lynch — 97/100
🔴 Weakest match
Samuel Armstrong Nelson — 5/100
🗣️ Why do they disagree?
This stock sparks a sharp divide between growth-focused and value-driven methodologies. Peter Lynch and Philip Fisher—both legendary growth investors—rank it near the top, with Lynch calling it a 'growth candidate' and Fisher’s near-perfect score suggesting it meets his criteria for long-term potential, despite insufficient fundamental data. Meanwhile, Morgan Housel and Edgar Lawrence Smith, who favor quiet compounders and decade-long holds, also give it strong marks, reinforcing the idea that this stock could thrive for patient investors. However, value-oriented approaches like Benjamin Graham’s strict criteria and the efficient-market perspective from Malkiel/Bogle dismiss it outright, with Graham calling it ‘not statistically cheap’ and the duo arguing passive indexing is the better bet. The contrast between these extremes highlights whether the stock’s growth potential outweighs its valuation—or if it’s already priced for perfection.
Philip Fisher
Common Stocks and Uncommon Profits (1958)
🟢 100
Not enough fundamentals data for a real Fisher read
Key question
How exceptional is this business, really?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 20%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Peter Lynch
One Up on Wall Street (1989)
🟢 97
Growth candidate — the price hasn't caught up to the growth
Key question
Is the growth worth the price?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Morgan Housel
The Psychology of Money (2020)
🟢 90
The kind of quiet compounder a patient holder could actually stick with
Key question
Could I live with this volatility long enough for compounding to actually work?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Edgar Lawrence Smith
Common Stocks as Long-Term Investments (1924)
🟢 88
Looks like a real 'buy and hold for a decade' candidate
Key question
Is this a stock I'd be happy to hold and forget about for a decade?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Walter Bagehot
Lombard Street (1873)
🟢 76
Not enough balance-sheet data for a real Bagehot read
Key question
Does this company have enough liquidity to survive real stress?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 25%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Gerald M. Loeb
The Battle for Investment Survival (1935)
🟢 73
Reasonable capital-preservation profile
Key question
How much capital could I lose here if I'm wrong?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Charles Mackay
Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1841)
🟢 65
Some signs of crowd excitement building
Key question
Am I being swept along with the crowd, or thinking for myself?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks
The Most Important Thing (2011) / Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 58
Mixed — a good business, but expectations may already be high
Key question
What is the market probably misunderstanding about the risk here?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jesse Livermore
Reminiscences of a Stock Operator (1923) / How to Trade in Stocks (1940)
🟡 51
No clear trend — Livermore preferred to stay out of this
Key question
What is the price telling me right now?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Thorstein Veblen
The Theory of Business Enterprise (1904)
🟡 45
Mixed signal on whether growth translates to real profit
Key question
Is management building real value, or just building itself?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Howard Marks (Market Cycle)
Mastering the Market Cycle (2018)
🟡 39
Looks late-cycle — the position Marks would treat with extra caution
Key question
Where are we in the cycle right now — near a hot extreme, or a cold one?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham
Security Analysis (1934) / The Intelligent Investor (1949)
🔴 35
Fails most of Graham's defensive criteria
Key question
Where is my margin of safety?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Burton Malkiel & John Bogle
A Random Walk Down Wall Street (1973) / The Little Book of Common Sense Investing (2007)
🔴 32
Weak case — Malkiel/Bogle would say a low-cost index is the simpler bet
Key question
Do I actually have an edge here, or do I just think I do?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Jack Schwager
Market Wizards (1989)
🔴 24
No real setup here — the discipline Schwager's wizards shared would say stay out
Key question
What's the risk/reward here, and where is my exit point?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Benjamin Graham (Enterprising Investor)
The Intelligent Investor (1949) — the Enterprising Investor chapters
🔴 15
Not statistically cheap enough for the Enterprising Investor's looser safety bar
Key question
Is the stock statistically cheap enough to justify the extra risk?
⚠️ Partial data for this stock — score is less reliable — Data availability: 45%
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Samuel Armstrong Nelson
The ABC of Stock Speculation (1903)
🔴 5
Cycle looks stretched toward overbought
Key question
Is the price overextended, or is there still room to move?
Fact → Principle → Simulation
Based on the last 277 trading days, calculated from real price data. Click an indicator for details and a chart.
🟢 Most indicators support an uptrend (8 bullish · 3 bearish · 1 neutral)
A market-structure read based purely on real price and volume data — not full classic Wyckoff schematic identification (Phase A-E), but a quantitative analysis of what can reliably be computed: trading ranges, "effort vs. result", volume within the range, and Spring/Upthrust detection.
The stock is in a clear uptrend with no defined trading range in the period examined.
Low confidence
The Wyckoff Method, developed by Richard Wyckoff in the early 20th century, reads the balance of supply and demand through price and volume, based on the premise that large investors ("smart money") quietly accumulate shares before rallies and quietly distribute them before declines. The read here is based solely on real price and volume data — full, precise identification of classic Wyckoff patterns (such as Phases A-E) requires human chart-reading experience and judgment, so this is an approximate algorithmic read, not a substitute for professional analysis. This should not be considered investment advice.
Gross Margin
—
Operating Margin
—
Net Margin
—
EBITDA Margin
—
ROE
10.4%
ROA
1.2%
ROIC
—
EPS
$1.12
Cash
$210.33M
Total Debt
$735.83M
Current Ratio
—
Debt/Equity
0.52
אין נתונים היסטוריים זמינים.
Total dividend per share paid each year, over the last 5 years.
| Ex-Dividend Date | Amount per Share |
|---|---|
| 1.7.2026 | $0.430 |
| 1.4.2026 | $0.430 |
| 31.12.2025 | $0.430 |
| 1.10.2025 | $0.430 |
| 1.7.2025 | $0.430 |
| 1.4.2025 | $0.430 |
| 31.12.2024 | $0.430 |
| 1.10.2024 | $0.430 |
| 1.7.2024 | $0.430 |
| 28.3.2024 | $0.430 |
| 28.12.2023 | $0.430 |
| 28.9.2023 | $0.430 |
How is Fair Value calculated? →
Current Price
$25.03
Estimated Fair Value (DCF)
$19.92
Model estimate — not a price target. Highly sensitive to growth/discount-rate assumptions.
Gap
-20.4%
🔴 Appears expensive relative to estimated value
Year 1 Growth Rate
10.0%
Discount Rate (WACC)
9.0%
Terminal Growth Rate
2.5%
Projection Years
5
| Year | Growth Rate | Projected FCF | Present Value |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10.0% | $138.47M | $127.04M |
| 2 | 8.1% | $149.73M | $126.02M |
| 3 | 6.3% | $159.08M | $122.84M |
| 4 | 4.4% | $166.04M | $117.63M |
| 5 | 2.5% | $170.19M | $110.61M |
Base FCF (last actual year)
$125.89M
Terminal Value
$2.68B
Present Value of Terminal Value
$1.74B
Enterprise Value
$2.35B
Net Debt
$525.50M
Equity Value
$1.82B
*The DCF model is an estimate based on assumptions — not a guaranteed forecast. You can change the assumptions to examine different scenarios.
Book Value per Share
$15.59
Tangible Book Value per Share (Tangible NAV)
$15.16
Sentiment based on basic keywords (not AI) — 4 positive, 11 neutral, 1 negative out of the last 16 articles.
Yahoo · 17.9.2026
SeekingAlpha · 15.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 10.9.2026
Yahoo · 9.9.2026
Yahoo · 8.9.2026
Yahoo · 2.9.2026
ChartMill · 1.9.2026
GlobeNewswire · 12.8.2026
GlobeNewswire · 11.8.2026
ChartMill · 11.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 1.8.2026
SeekingAlpha · 31.7.2026
GuruFocus.com · 30.7.2026
SeekingAlpha · 30.7.2026
Adamas Trust Inc. 6.875% Series F Fixed-to-Floating Rate Cumulative Redeemable Preferred Stock $0.01 par value per share (ADAML) currently has a StockIQ AI score of 61/100, rated "Moderate". The score is a weighted average across up to 7 categories (technical, fundamental, growth, fair value, news, quality, risk), based on real data only.
ADAML currently scores 61/100 (Moderate) across the categories we measure. StockIQ doesn't give buy/sell recommendations — use this as one data point in your own research, not as investment advice.
Per StockIQ's DCF model, ADAML's estimated fair value is $19.92, which is 20.4% below the current price of $25.03. This is one valuation model among several signals in the fair-value category, not a price target.
ADAML's technical score is 77/100, which currently reads as bullish — based on real price/volume signals (moving averages, RSI, MACD, and more), not a prediction of what happens next.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Earnings per share (EPS) growth: 196.5%; Free cash flow growth: 1290.3%; Net income growth: 340.3%.
Based on the real signals StockIQ computed: Estimated fair value: $19.92 vs. price $25.03 (-20.4%); CMF 20 days: -0.28; %K 100.0 — overbought.
Yes — ADAML has a real recorded dividend payment history on StockIQ. See the Dividends section on this page for the actual per-share amounts and dates.
Real transactions by officers and insiders, as reported to the SEC on Form 4 — 0 purchases and 0 sales out of the last 25 filings.
| Name | Transaction Type | Date | Shares | Change | Price |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cheng Gena | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Greenberg Audrey | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Norcutt Steven G | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Mumma Steven R | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Pendergast Lisa A | Grant/Award from Employer | 19.6.2026 | 14,238 | +14,238 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | -18,678 | — |
| Clement Michael B. | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 10.6.2026 | 18,678 | +18,678 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 5,827 | -5,827 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 751 | -751 | $8.41 |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 27.1.2026 | 2,237 | -2,237 | $8.41 |
| Nario-Eng Kristine Rimando | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 61,989 | +61,989 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 127,321 | +127,321 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Grant/Award from Employer | 22.1.2026 | 216,711 | +216,711 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 84,737 | -84,737 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 41,032 | -41,032 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | -34,179 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 21,455 | -21,455 | $7.30 |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 48,948 | +48,948 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Tax Withholding in Shares | 1.1.2026 | 14,509 | -14,509 | $7.30 |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 41,032 | +41,032 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 48,948 | -48,948 | — |
| Serrano Jason T | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 34,179 | +34,179 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 32,122 | +32,122 | — |
| Mah Nicholas | Exercise of Derivative Securities | 1.1.2026 | 24,414 | +24,414 | — |
Official FINRA data — the number of shares open in short positions, plus daily short-sale activity.
1,432 shares short as of 2026-08-31 · vs. 6,968 on 2026-07-31
Official biweekly report (FINRA Rule 4560) — no real higher-frequency data exists for this metric.
54.4% of trading volume this week was short selling, vs. 45.4% the prior week
Based on daily short-sale volume (Reg SHO) — a different metric from the open short interest above: this is daily trading volume, not an open position, so it updates weekly rather than biweekly.
Full breakdown of every data type and its source: Data Sources · Methodology